Again, not fucking true.Exercise affects like 5-10% of your body weight. Its the difference between pudgy and ripped, but not the difference between normal weight and overweight.
People saying "exercise is irrelevant", if you are losing 300 calories in exercise a day, that's going to add up to losing an additional 2.5 lbs a month, or 30 lbs a year. Just because you're not going to drop 10 lbs instantly doesn't mean it's irrelevant.
I've lost 100+ lbs. Then I put it back on and lost it again.
A super intense hour of exercise -- which most people don't do, even if they do "workout" -- will only burn maybe 400-600 calories. Most people are probably jogging for 30 minutes and maybe burning 200-300 calories. That's like one cookie or a bag of chips. It's nothing. For all practical purposes, working out is not going to help you lose weight. It's like trying to get water out of a sinking ship with an 8oz cup.
Working out will make you look better if you're already at a healthy weight, and it will improve your overall physical and mental health. But it is not an effective weight loss tool.
Please don't peddle nonsense. Exercise and nutrition both affect weight loss. To suggest the former does nothing toward that goal is wrong, wrong, wrong.Exercise really doesn't affect weight loss at all. Unless you're working out like 5 hours a day, every day. It's all about what you eat.
Those fat burners are a scam. There are some prescription weight loss drugs but they have issues.
Burning 3-400 extra calories means doing very strenuous exercise. Don't forget that the numbers that machines spit out at you include what you would have burned had you not exercised.The 3-400 extra calories burned from exercise combined with keeping an eye on your diet is not insignificant at all. Feel like folks are undervaluing that way too much. Yes, you're not going to burn 2,000 calories in one day of intense exercise generally, but you're not really supposed to. It's something that adds up to a significant change over time, months/years, not days/weeks.
Looking at 3-400 extra calories burned in a vacuum is fairly insignificant, but someone burning 3-400 extra calories 3-5 times a week adds up overtime, especially if you combine it with reduced caloric intake.
Burning 3-400 extra calories means doing very strenuous exercise. Don't forget that the numbers that machines spit out at you include what you would have burned had you not exercised.
Neither do I and it's extremely frustrating. I think the attitude stems from people thinking the bare minimum is enough. It might be in some cases, but eating healthier and fewer calories while also exercising is the best way to lose weight and be fit.Looking up some estimates, I should burn around 450 calories on the 3 mile runs I do (I'm 185 lbs). That's around 1/4 or 1/5 of my daily food intake. I would say that's very significant, especially if I run 4-5 times per week. And exercising generally improves mental health which puts you on the right track for weight loss. Running 4-5 times per week keeps my constantly thinking about my health and diet and how I feel.
Running 3 miles at a good pace is hard but I don't really find it to be "very strenuous." I guess everyone's definition of strenuous would be different.
I just don't get the dismissive attitude towards exercise in here.
300 calories is warm up.Burning 3-400 extra calories means doing very strenuous exercise. Don't forget that the numbers that machines spit out at you include what you would have burned had you not exercised.
Right! Lol. I burn 800 calories in a 45 minute kickboxing session. People don't need to go to the gym for 3 hrs a day to burn off a substantial amount.
Diet pills marketed as diet pills don't really do anything. They're packed full of unscientific crap and marked up to ridiculous premiums.I'm currently bed bound with an illness so I can't exercise currently. But because I'm not very mobile I'm putting on weight. The medication I take also actually makes me put on weight too. So I'm trying to eat healthy to combat this.
Amazon Marketplace sent me an email regarding some weight loss fat burners and they're rated 4.5 stars. Are they actually effective? Again keep in mind I'm not in a state to exercise currently.
Thank you. Please share your experiences if possible.
Hydroxycut always works for me. Just recently Ive been running a 5K 4-5 times a week, eating around 1200-1500 calories and couldn't get below 190lbs. I would go up and down between 190-193 depending on when I weighed myself. I took Hydroxycut for 2 weeks while doing the same routine and hit 183.
I stopped taking the pills and started back lifting recently. Now I'm at a steady 187 while increasing my calorie intake to help aid in muscle growth. I've taken hydroxycut many times through the years and it always helps me get past the weight loss plateaus
Going from a sedentary life to even just walking a good amount each day can have an affect on weight. Obviously shouldn't rely solely on it but if a drastic change exercise can definitely make a difference.Exercise affects like 5-10% of your body weight. Its the difference between pudgy and ripped, but not the difference between normal weight and overweight.
It could be... Anyone know how much people get paid for those testimonials?
I tried ECA once and it just reminded me of when I got put on Adderall.1. Supplements that are basically thermogenics will raise your resting calorie rate but have effects like increased heart rate and such.
2. Appetite curbers might help if you overeat
3. If you want to do either of the above without exercise you'll need to change your diet so that you don't pass out because your body isn't getting enough nutrients.
I've done an EC(ephedrine and caffeine) stack which is basically 1+2 together and they are effective but if you have heart problems, anxiety problems, it could be dangerous. But I usually combine it with exercise which helps with the weight loss.
The short of it is that weight loss pills won't be very effective if you don't also introduce exercise and or diet changes
how are people saying stuff in here like "Exercise only helps you with mental and physical health, it's not going help you lose weight!"
How is feeling better physically and mentally not completely entwined with losing weight? IT'S A HOLISTIC THING. It all matters. It's all tied together.
A cousin of mine suddenly dropped a lot of weight and it turns out she was taking diet pills of some kind. Frankly, I don't know how something could be that drastic unless it was eliminating your appetite completely or were simply amphetamines.
She stopped taking them and gained the weight back.
IF and autophagy out of it is in TED talk.
Where is your god now? Those who still doubt me and my method.
I read a case of someone taking fat burner pills from some spam ad and overdosing by taking two pills, the result overclocked their metabolism so much that their body could no longer expel the heat fast enough and they died from overheating despite medical care.
Neither do I and it's extremely frustrating. I think the attitude stems from people thinking the bare minimum is enough. It might be in some cases, but eating healthier and fewer calories while also exercising is the best way to lose weight and be fit.
I've lost weight in three different ways over the course of my life: Changing my diet with no exercise incorporated; exercising while still eating in excess; and exercising while eating better. I lost weight doing each one but the most successful one was eating better and exercising together. Unsurprisingly I mentally felt my worst when I only changed my diet and never exercised.