Avengers Infinity War trailer reaches 100 Million YouTube Views after 2 weeks
- Thread starter Imperial Bishop
- Start date
No please. I appreciate the deal and all but lets not shoehorn X-Men into the currently planned Infinity War and the 4th one.
Damn and the Justice League trailer currently has 29 million views, really highlighting how Marvel did a great job in setting up its cinematic universe.
But I was told you don't need origin stories to set up a team movie.
This is exactly the reason you make origin stories to set up a team movie.
The trailer was bang average if you ask me. But it had everyone in it from the last 10 years worth of movies that lead to this moment.
OP
OP
News from the year 2084:
"Avengers 24 breaks WorldTube viewcount record!"
It's impressive that Marvel managed to make their B and C tier superheroes bigger than Batman and Superman. Likewise it's also impressive how WB did the opposite.
Why so salty? You seem to overcompensate whenever possible.
You do not need origin movies to set up a team movie. You need the team movie to be good.
I'm sure this was "told" to you.
Makes more sense to compare the Justice League trailer to The Avengers (2012) trailer which has 27million views.
Just doing what everybody else is doing
Thought it was fun to shit on movies. I hear Lady Bird is trash because it got one bad review. That's a shame.
Even SS has an Oscar. Tsk tsk.
I disagree. There are two Avengers movies out and the last one is average at best yet here we are not because of stellar or even good team movies but because of a lot of setting up in between.
OP
OP
Not sure it's fair to compare it The Last Jedi since Infinity War is the culmination of over a decade of work. 20+ movies combined.
In order to prove origin movies are necessary you would have to have a good team up that performed unexpectedly poorly, but no such film exists.
The only halfway good example we have that you're wrong is Age Of Ultron, which was one of the less well received Marvel movies and, correspondingly, was a relative underperformer.
Although the best evidence that origin movies are not necessary is whether you've ever seen another movie in your life that featured more than one character, and whether you felt you needed an origin movie to understand who the other ones were. I'm going to guess that you didn't.
It's an especially absurd suggestion given how simplistic the characterisation is for all superheroes. That's not a criticism, but the origin movies are not complex character studies that requires hours of dedicated screentime.
I'm specifically referring to WB since it's a super hero thread and some people were always loud enough to make it clear that just having Batman and Superman in a rushed universe is enough to get that sweet Avengers money, but after each box office thread and trailer release I get proved wrong.
You say that but wait when the Avengers 4 stinger teases Avengers vs Xmen!
I wouldn't have guessed it, because it's even more surprising that Marvel is adapting a story that they published only 4 years ago for this movie. But it's worth it because Jonathan Hickman's run on Avengers is one of the best ever.
That's gotta feel pretty good for him, his book inspiring one of the biggest movies ever before it's even 5 years old.
2.6 million likes to 56k dislikes is actually a fantastic like-dislike ratio.
Higher than any blockbuster trailer I can recall.
If Batman v Superman was good it would have made as much money as Avengers. It already made close to $900 million despite being one of the worst reviewed blockbusters in living memory, with legs so bad it was dead in the water just a week after release.
And why are superhero movies different? Why are they incomprehensible without origin movies, but every other movie in history is not?
Hope this helps Black Panther because the trailer featured a good amount of T'Challa and Wakanda.