I would be fine if they had premium but released the maps to the public after 2 or so months.
my bad I should have mention the source or rather leak.
Atake it with a gram of salt. It's from almightydaq, the dude who leaked bf1.
I'm inclined to believe this dude. I'm hoping it's true, I'm excited for it.
I didn't realize people weren't fond of the horses in Battlefield 1. I don't mind them. Maybe I haven't played the game long enough, are they really annoying or something?
I'm inclined to believe this dude. I'm hoping it's true, I'm excited for it.
I didn't realize people weren't fond of the horses in Battlefield 1. I don't mind them. Maybe I haven't played the game long enough, are they really annoying or something?
According to the leak, the DLC should be release faster than BF1.
I would be pretty disappointed if its really World War 2 again. I think CoD clearly shows the fatigue is still very present.
Maybe my question should be, "which guns are the best according to each corresponding class?". So that's my question now. Thanks Supreme Allah and Striker86. This game is so damn fun.
my bad I should have mention the source or rather leak.
Atake it with a gram of salt. It's from almightydaq, the dude who leaked bf1.
I'm definitely up for WW2. 50 vs. 50 sounds perfect, 10 squads per side, enormous conquest maps.
You will get Operation Metro a third time and you will like it.
Medic: Fedorov Avtomat, Autloading 8 extended, Mondragon
Maybe my question should be, "which guns are the best according to each corresponding class?". So that's my question now. Thanks Supreme Allah and Striker86. This game is so damn fun.
bruh
Btw, finally mopped up some DLC weapons I've been missing, and now I only need a service star with the Nagant revolver, the Obrez and the Kolibri to have (at least) one with every variant in the game, yay. Nearly 43400 kills and the most I have with a single weapon is 1712 :D
Trying to get a service star with the Kolibri seems like a pretty good way to make you hate the game.
Behemoths were supposed to let a losing team gain an edge so they can make a comeback. It didn't work, thanks in no small part to the way the Conquest scoring system works.
They also remove 4 to 6 players from actually going for any but a few select objectives. The Dreadnought especially is just a big pile of shit that contributes fuck all, the train is stuck on rails (duh) and the Zeppelin gets instakilled in 5 minutes if there's a single person on the other team who wants to take it down. All it takes is an AA that's hard to get an angle on, or an HMG emplacement, or a single decent pilot...
So yeah, it might've been a decent idea sometime but it was executed badly.
It would be a smart decision if they're planning a release in both 2018 and 2019, historical periods like the World Wars will probably be abandoned soon again so might as well make a great WW2 game with refined mechanics put forward in BF1. 2019's Battlefield would then have a good chunk of time to refine, reintroduce, and innovate the modern formula.I can def see ww2 happening since bf1 pretty much plays like a ww2 game. A lot of recycle assets will be used I am assuming.
Behemoths were supposed to let a losing team gain an edge so they can make a comeback. It didn't work, thanks in no small part to the way the Conquest scoring system works.
They also remove 4 to 6 players from actually going for any but a few select objectives. The Dreadnought especially is just a big pile of shit that contributes fuck all, the train is stuck on rails (duh) and the Zeppelin gets instakilled in 5 minutes if there's a single person on the other team who wants to take it down. All it takes is an AA that's hard to get an angle on, or an HMG emplacement, or a single decent pilot...
So yeah, it might've been a decent idea sometime but it was executed badly.
Gotta love instadying randomly to behemoths. They should give each side 3 of them, why stop at 1?!
/salt