-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
-
We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Battlefield V - PC System Requirements
- Thread starter Theorry
- Start date
I ran the beta on GTX 660 2GB and Phenom 965 3,4 Ghz and it ran at about 20 frames on lowest settings at 1080p with ~50% resolution scale. I dont trust these minimum requirements.
All low with a %100 resolution scale in the beta got me 50-60fps with a i5 7500+ 750ti+ 8 gb ram.
Core clock is important. So if you can OC the cpu you can push your 1070 even more.
Only me who can't see the specs in OP?
The 970 and 1060 perform similarly, but the former's 4GB VRAM may be an issue as far as higher texture quality settings are concerned.
Massive framerate hit, most people will disable it, some will keep it. Just like it is/was with Gameworks.
The image is hosted on Twitter, which may be blocked at your end. I'll rehost it on Imgur and update the URL.
Edit: Done.
Edit edit:
Oh, I don't doubt the reflections won't come cheap. I'm just curious how the cards will fare as this is going to be the first time RTX has been benchmarked in a game.
Last edited:
Looks like DICE might get me to get the game at launch after all (brb looking into origin premier).
Just my curiosity on how ray tracing runs on my 2080 Ti alone is enough for me to pay at least $15.
Just my curiosity on how ray tracing runs on my 2080 Ti alone is enough for me to pay at least $15.
Last edited:
I want developers to list out what performance you can expect on these specs. I have almost the exact same minimum specs and was able to do 1080p medium on the Beta very nicely.
Seems like everyone has their own definition of what minimum should be.
Seems like everyone has their own definition of what minimum should be.
I have a 970 with a 6600k and got around 75fp average in the beta on high but really random and weird stutters when ADSing.
i really wish devs would stop with the whole "minimum" and "recommended" shit. like, what will that get me? is minimum specs for 1080p/60? what will recommended specs get me? 1440p60?
my 6600k+1070 was getting around 60fps at 1440p during the alpha and closed beta. id really like to push for more as well. ill just wait and see what kind of optimizations were made for launch.
its similar to the 1060, I have a 970 and the alpha ran fine all things considered. Obviously I wasn't maxing out the graphics or anything.
OP
OP
Thanks works now.
Can't wait to play this. Have upgraded my GPU only to be able to play this on my 1440p screen. Hope it delivers !
They have not said yet - but I really think they will ship with it. What I played back in August was already surprisingly polished - it will only be more so now (I can guarantee it).
Like JaseC I am very curious how the different RTX cards will scale with RT being enabled.
OP
OP
Beta is always abit different offcourse. With optimization and no launch drivers. But DICE said the requirements are the same as BF1 abit and you should expect the same performance. If BF1 ran fine it wont be much different.
Yeah, this too. Medium settings today aren't the medium settings of 5-10 years ago. Hell even on low the game looks fantastic until you really get up in the face of a texture.
I think you'll be pretty happy. :)
Using a 2080 Ti at work, it's really nice to play with that one. :D
So if we called a PC with an 8700K and Titan Xpascal the "doomslayer" what does that make this freak?!
Beta ran at a nearly locked 60 for me when maxed out at 1440 with a 1080, i7 6700k, and 16 gigs of ram. I'm in no real rush to upgrade to any rtx cards, and the beta even without raytracing had more than enough visual candy to keep me happy.
Can you tell us anything about how that 2080 Ti performs with ray tracing enabled?
I understand if you can't talk about it yet tho.
I would be playing this on a i7 8700k and 2080 Ti on a 4k monitor if it actually launches with ray tracing support.
Last edited:
Those minimum requiremts are just wrong. Bf1 has the same minimum requiremts and my i5 4670k even without overklocking runs it just fine with usually over 100fps.
Well my GTX 980 seems to be hanging in there alright, but my i5-4690K is starting to be too low for minimum specs on games. I know it will still run just fine, I can run BF1 with no issues. But it's just weird not seeing my processor meet what the developers consider minimum specs anymore.
I dont know why they would release information like this. It will hurt their sales....
I have:
i5 3570K (3.8GHz max, can't OC)
AMD 280X
8GB RAM
Can I expect solid 60FPS at 1280x800? (all minimum and hopefully with a tricky .cfg)
Thanks.
i5 3570K (3.8GHz max, can't OC)
AMD 280X
8GB RAM
Can I expect solid 60FPS at 1280x800? (all minimum and hopefully with a tricky .cfg)
Thanks.
The 6gb version of the 1060 is still about 20% faster, as it's on par with a 980, but he'll be fine. I wouldn't put much stock in any of these requirements anyway. They often make no sense.
your CPU is close to a match to the recommended CPU (1300x)
your GPU has a big advantage compared to the minimum GPU, you should be fine at 1080P medium I would think
the 1300x is 4c/4t like the 6600K and is simply slower at anything, and the 1300x is under recommended.