He's hiding what he told the Grand Jury.Wait I'm confused. What could he be hiding if only 1 officer saw a charge in the case?
Like I want this to be a massive reveal, but I'm skeptic about the implications.
Ah ok, gotcha!He's hiding what he told the Grand Jury.
Basically the implication is he told the public that the Grand Jury was made aware of much more than they actually were.
This is routine. These fuckers work with cops day in and out. They rely on them to make convictions. It's a super huge conflict of insterest to have them be the ones putting forth charges to a secret grand jury. They downplay officer misconduct. They don't fight jury changes by the defense. they don't show all of the evidence. Basically they low effor the entire thing.
Think about this: It's SUPER common and easy for grand jury's to indict on just about EVERY OTHER issue in front of them, EXCEPT when it comes to cops. Sure, some of that is likely the idiotic cops cna do no wrong belief in this country, but a lot of it is because these guys aren't really interested in punishing cops. They are part of that gang.
It should be a completely different team with no ties to police and answerable to the people that brings cases to a grandjury.
Wait I'm confused. What could he be hiding if only 1 officer saw a charge in the case?
Like I want this to be a massive reveal, but I'm skeptical about the implications.
Edit: Like if the evidence is damning, wouldn't this also make the grand jury look awful?
To you last point, if he did not tell them all the evidence he had, then it's possible they did not make a fair decision. Or he could have presented it differently than he did to the public. But he claims he did and is trying to say the grand jury deliberations and presentations are secret. Essentially asking us to take his word at it, and that we can only know what he tells us.Wait I'm confused. What could he be hiding if only 1 officer saw a charge in the case?
Like I want this to be a massive reveal, but I'm skeptic about the implications.
Edit: Like if the evidence is damning, wouldn't this also make the grand jury look awful?
The Grand Jury is meant to be a secretive body. It's apparent that the public interest in this case isn't going to allow that to happen. As the special prosecutor, our team has an ethical obligation not to release the recording from the Grand Jury proceedings, and we stand by our belief that such a release could compromise the ongoing federal investigation and could have unintended consequences such as poisoning the jury pool. Despite these concerns, we will comply with the Judge's order to release the recording on Wednesday. The release of the recording will also address the legal complaint filed by an anonymous grand juror."
"We have no concerns with grand jurors sharing their thoughts on our presentation because we are confident in the case we presented. Once the public listens to the recording, they will see that over the course of two-and-a-half days, our team presented a thorough and complete case to the Grand Jury. Our prosecutors presented all of the evidence, even though the evidence supported that Sergeant Mattingly and Detective Cosgrove were justified in their use of force after having been fired upon by Kenneth Walker. For that reason, the only charge recommended was wanton endangerment.
Nah... haven't you heard? Although just about anyone can indict a ham sandwich, pork chop sandwiches are a bitch to indict.Think about this: It's SUPER common and easy for grand jury's to indict on just about EVERY OTHER issue in front of them, EXCEPT when it comes to cops. Sure, some of that is likely the idiotic cops cna do no wrong belief in this country, but a lot of it is because these guys aren't really interested in punishing cops. They are part of that gang.
100% correct.When cops talk about the blue line: Prosecutors are part of it.
Wow if this is true then Cameron is even more of a grade-A piece of shit then we already knew.
This is why he did what he did.He learned from the best.
No, literally, he's McConnell's protege and was specifically anointed to be Kentucky AG to set up a future run for higher office.
I'm looking for a good link, but the judge has ruled this has to be released by Wednesday, and Cameron has released a statement super butthurt about it.
Edit: https://www.wkyt.com/2020/09/28/gra...-proceedings-in-breonna-taylor-investigation/
Cameron's statement:
Yeah this is why shit happens white society as a whole does thing thing they let a couple of us in then shut the door, the only way things change at these levels is a lot of us flooding these establishments all at once then changing on the inside there is less likelihood of assimilation when we are in govt in numbers all at once. But when its like this shit still is the same and the tokens etc exist due to it. Many times black and brown and women etc are actually harder on us than their white counterparts so they can fit in. It's sick.It's bad enough having to fight virulent white supremacy using the system is to kill us
But when you look up, and you see the AG is someone who looks like you and he's bought all the way in on white supremacy
That's when you sit there and wonder if we ever really gonna make it........ minute some white man whisper in a selfish niggas ear, and he goes full turncoat and obfuscates and blocks any sort of justice.......
We really never gon be free forreal, too many enemies on all sides, across the line and behind it
Perfect. Eat shit dip shit.I'm looking for a good link, but the judge has ruled this has to be released by Wednesday, and Cameron has released a statement super butthurt about it.
Edit: https://www.wkyt.com/2020/09/28/gra...-proceedings-in-breonna-taylor-investigation/
Cameron's statement:
Honestly would not be shocked if this kills his higher aspirations. You know you only get one shot as a good one
And through all the gears, twice in reverseHe bout to find out real quick what all that steppin' gets him in the end.
Nice uncomfortable spot under the bus.
1/ During his press conference, Cameron suggested the grand jury made the legal determination: "My job is to present the facts to the grand jury and the grand jury then applies those facts to the law."
Today he concedes that his team recommended the charges to the grand jury.
It's bad enough having to fight virulent white supremacy using the system is to kill us
But when you look up, and you see the AG is someone who looks like you and he's bought all the way in on white supremacy
That's when you sit there and wonder if we ever really gonna make it........ minute some white man whisper in a selfish niggas ear, and he goes full turncoat and obfuscates and blocks any sort of justice.......
We really never gon be free forreal, too many enemies on all sides, across the line and behind it
Hopefully this destroys this Uncle Tom's career.He learned from the best.
No, literally, he's McConnell's protege and was specifically anointed to be Kentucky AG to set up a future run for higher office.
A grand jury is a tool. If a prosecutor has strong evidence they can use that tool to achieve any number of outcomes favorable to them. The defense generally has no say at this stage. Ultimately, it was his choice to pursue the lower charges.
When cops talk about the blue line: Prosecutors are part of it.
Like holding back evidence to make the officer seem not guilty?
Lmao It's sad but true, there will always be coons throwing Black people under the bus. I'm surprised McConnell even has a Black protege.It's bad enough having to fight virulent white supremacy using the system is to kill us
But when you look up, and you see the AG is someone who looks like you and he's bought all the way in on white supremacy
That's when you sit there and wonder if we ever really gonna make it........ minute some white man whisper in a selfish niggas ear, and he goes full turncoat and obfuscates and blocks any sort of justice.......
We really never gon be free forreal, too many enemies on all sides, across the line and behind it
Yeah!
...wait, what? You realize a juror is exposing the lies perpetrated by the AG, yeah?