The more I think about it, the more it doesn't sit right with me that Bridget looks exactly the same despite it being 6~7 years later in-game, even to the point of copying the height and weight in the profile wholesale. People who were...er...pining for Bridget before (including an incident with another in-game character) were pining for and sexualizing a child at the end of the day. It really seems like a copout to (on the surface level) change the cloak/jacket and call it a day. She's still fumbling while walking backward, etc. Basically hitting all the beats of her sprite set in X2, except Strive-ified. Seemingly no real maturation at all.
It reminds me how Capcom had to near be dragged kicking and screaming for Sakura to no longer be in high school. (Uh...she uses her school uniform as her fighting clothes. Yeah, yeah, that's it.)
Maybe they did de-canonize Bridget showing up in X2 to some extent, but I was pretty interested to see what an adult Bridget would be like, what adventures/experiences they would've come up with to shape her. Instead it's just...95% what we got before. I know it can definitely be argued that fans of any type would have wanted the character they remembered back. But change can be fun, too, a la Testament. Testament is frozen in time, physically, and still is clearly a changed Gear.
I hope the dev team at least goes into it in their next Backyard posting, because after 7 damn years, there'd be something visibly different. Characters should be allowed to grow up.
Just as an aside, I think people should be careful in general. As a veteran of ridiculous internet arguments for near 20 years, sometimes people really are just...ignorant. In the purest sense of the word. And sometimes to an alarming degree. You can say things like "How could someone not know something as simple as [X] in [insert current year here]," but it's very easy to project your experiences onto other people. The internet (read: the world) is vast, and everyone has their spheres of influence and bubbles that they reside in. People may not know as much as you, have read the things you have, have been privy to the info and experiences that you have, or simply may be coming from a different or sheltered upbringing. No one was born (or is now) perfectly "woke" and people have to learn things from somewhere/someone. That someone might end up being you one day.
So, while it is important to suss out and shut down bad-faith actors, I would advise against wholesale declaring anyone with [X] viewpoint to be a bad-faith actor and shooting them on first sight, or saying that anyone of [Y] minority group with [X] viewpoint must be a sockpuppet account, or to automatically say "Just asking questions, huh? Yeahhhhhhhhh, riiiiight," because...yeah, sometimes people do have questions. I've had Bad™ opinions before. We all have been there at some point in time, surely. That's what makes bad-faith actors insidious in the first place: they've poisoned the notion that anyone could be coming in good faith or is not out to just waste your time.
I've literally come across people where I was the first Black person they've interacted with. Multiply that by whatever number since I moved to Japan (I'm American). I know that no one, myself included, has time to fix everyone and all of the ill-conceived notions they may carry in their brain. But while indeed "Google is free," sometimes you have to ask yourself are you so sure that what they'd end up clicking on Google would be correct. Are you sure they're not about to end up on Prager U or something? You have to leave that little bit of space, because while you may not always have the time, there are any number of actually malignant (sometimes very well-funded) bad-faith actors chomping at the bit to "educate" people in your stead.
Just keep it in the back of your mind on your daily journey through the internet.