They'll know who I am once I post this here so I'll update you guys if they ban me from the server for sharing this exchange:
This exchange occurred in the Official CDPR CyberPunk 2077 Discord. Some of you may think it's whatever but I thought the way this topic slid by was disappointing. Does every dev need to make comments on their stances? No - But once asked directly? Should they be willing to take a stance? I think so.
Apolitical stances are a defense of the status quo and they're far more tiring than the small effort to be progressive.
Let's talk CD Projekt history-
We know they issued no apology and fired the guy who did the GoG transphobic joke, and it went down allegedly like this (https://www.eurogamer.net/articles/...projekt-employee-and-the-spectre-of-gamergate):
That wasn't the only bad tweet from GoG - they also tweeted a GamerGate supporting meme.
And do recall, CyberPunk 2077's account tweeted a joke about trans issues as well - and we have no idea what the consequence was for them to correct it internally so that person may still be on the team unless we know otherwise for that account now (https://kotaku.com/cyberpunk-2077-tweets-transphobic-joke-studio-apologiz-1828502562):
Maybe we got off on the wrong foot 3 times, CD Projekt.
But then we get some 2018 CyberPunk 2077 info and there's troubling screenshots and depictions of minorities. They're from a womanizing street gang, they're a criminal technician in your ear, they're stereotypical convenience store owners and taxi drivers.
This screenshot has come up many times as stereotypical:
So the discussion arises in their discord:
Anyway, first the comment posted there - then the dev response is in red, and the mods are the blue user and the purple user.
This exchange occurred in the Official CDPR CyberPunk 2077 Discord. Some of you may think it's whatever but I thought the way this topic slid by was disappointing. Does every dev need to make comments on their stances? No - But once asked directly? Should they be willing to take a stance? I think so.
Apolitical stances are a defense of the status quo and they're far more tiring than the small effort to be progressive.
Let's talk CD Projekt history-
We know they issued no apology and fired the guy who did the GoG transphobic joke, and it went down allegedly like this (https://www.eurogamer.net/articles/...projekt-employee-and-the-spectre-of-gamergate):
On 22nd October, Polish game seller GOG - a part of CD Projekt - found itself in trouble again on Twitter. It had insensitively appropriated the trans civil rights hashtag WontBeErased. "Classic PC games #WontBeErased on our watch," it tweeted. "Yeah, how's that for some use of hashtags?"
GOG quickly deleted the tweet but not before the internet noticed, and a stink was kicked up. Not only was it a problem on its own, but it was the third problematic tweet in a handful of months from inside CD Projekt. Once is a mistake; three times?
A day after the #WontBeErased tweet, a response appeared, but it wasn't an apology. "Yesterday, we posted a tweet containing a trending hashtag as a pun," it said. "The tweet was neither intended as a malicious attack, nor as a comment to the ongoing social debate. GOG should focus only on games. We acknowledge that and we commit to it."
It didn't go down well, as Sean Halliday knew it wouldn't. The tweet had been his fault and he'd drafted his own apology as soon as the shitstorm had appeared. He's still got the draft, he tells me over Discord, and he shares it with me.
"A tweet was posted that included the hashtag 'WontBeErased'," it began. "The context of the hashtag was missed, which was a huge oversight on my behalf. After coming to understand the hashtag, and the importance of what it represents, the tweet was promptly deleted. Please allow me to apologise profusely for the offence the tweet caused. This was not the intention of the tweet by any means, nor was there any ill will intended.
"I empathise and strongly support LGBTQ folk from all walks of life. Video games are for everyone, regardless of race, gender, sexauilty, ability or religion. It's a mistake that has cost me an incredible amount. Everyone has the right to exist and live, it was a shameful mistake to make light of this. I will do better."
"All I can remember was the manager sat there and went, 'We're parting ways with you.'" -Sean Halliday
But Halliday wasn't allowed to use his tweet. He tried repeatedly but his manager said no. "We are not apologising for this," Halliday was apparently told, and his manager wrote the GOG response instead - minutes after he fired Halliday.
That wasn't the only bad tweet from GoG - they also tweeted a GamerGate supporting meme.
And do recall, CyberPunk 2077's account tweeted a joke about trans issues as well - and we have no idea what the consequence was for them to correct it internally so that person may still be on the team unless we know otherwise for that account now (https://kotaku.com/cyberpunk-2077-tweets-transphobic-joke-studio-apologiz-1828502562):
"Sorry to all those offended by one of the responses sent out from our account earlier," a tweet on the official Cyberpunk 2077 Twitter account said. "Harming anyone was never our intention."
CD Projekt Red did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
By itself, this is just a PR faux-pas, but this is not the first time a CD Projekt Red-related Twitter account has posted questionable content. Last July, the official Twitter account for GOG, the game storefront owned by CD Projekt, tweeted an animated GIF from Postal 2: Paradise Lost depicting the main character urinating on a tombstone marked Games Journalism. The date on the tombstone, August 28th, 2014, was a reference to GamerGate. The tweet was later deleted.
Maybe we got off on the wrong foot 3 times, CD Projekt.
But then we get some 2018 CyberPunk 2077 info and there's troubling screenshots and depictions of minorities. They're from a womanizing street gang, they're a criminal technician in your ear, they're stereotypical convenience store owners and taxi drivers.
This screenshot has come up many times as stereotypical:
So the discussion arises in their discord:
Anyway, first the comment posted there - then the dev response is in red, and the mods are the blue user and the purple user.
Last edited: