The one across the street from work is always busy as fuck, so I never go. Quite frankly, I don't have the time and can't be assed to wait in line 20-30 minutes (not joking) for a damn chicken sandwich. Plus, I'm trying to lose weight anyway. I don't need that shit. If I HAVE to get a chicken fix, I hit up Popeyes on the way home, and that's only if traffic isn't stupid.
Anyway, shame on them. Really shitty stance to take. Still, and I know some on ERA hate it, but unfortunately, there isn't moral based consumption in capitalism. Or rather, it's not really practiced. I know that can be seen as a meme or low effort, drive by type comment, but sadly it's true.
If you're gonna uphold a moral stance when it comes to what you buy, then there should be some level of consistency. You'll boycott Chic-fil-A because their views offend you or may even directly effect your way of life. That's fine and you're entitled to do that. But are you doing the same when it comes to other products and services you buy, especially those that don't necessarily target you personally? Your phone, your car, your clothes, your shoes, your cosmetics, your morning coffee, ect.
I'm not suggesting to take an absolute/ all or nothing approach to life. I'm not suggesting that if you can't do it all, don't do anything. If that were the case, then you'd pretty much have to be a vegan, living in the middle of nowhere. Still, most of what we consume is rooted in some kind of questionable or immoral practices. I don't fault or mock anyone who boycotts a company that outright supports hate groups are enables discrimination though.
I guess I'm just saying, consumers should be more aware of all things they directly or indirectly support. We all need to live, eat, go to work and pay bills. But surely and ultimately, we can do that, in a way that is more beneficial for all us. There needs to be accountability and transparency from everyone.