Thank you. His previous video on the subject was already pretty good. Doesn't shy away from criticism, but recontextualizes the issue more broadly so that it doesn't just become about lashing out at "YouTube Celebrity #A".
Oh this is getting really entertaining
First you're about to see a bunch of lefties jumping in on cancel culture is real!!!!
And while regurgitating that right wing nonsense,
Coffin retweeted agreeing with this:
Essentially cancel culture is real and the leftists criticizing Contrapoints are actually gamergate kiwifarms nazis
Oh this is getting really entertaining
First you're about to see a bunch of lefties jumping in on cancel culture is real!!!!
And while regurgitating that right wing nonsense,
Coffin retweeted agreeing with this:
[...]
Essentially cancel culture is real and the leftists criticizing Contrapoints are actually gamergate kiwifarms nazis
Seems like the ideas about having an organized, united left is more important than the actual values promoted by that left? And if you're hurting that united left you're in bed with the fash? I don't even fucking know what's going on anymore.How does "Can we respect non-binary individuals and treat them like real people" even become the Nazi-sided position in this situation?!?
This talking piont feels the same as when the idiots at red scare call antifa piontless larpersThere's a lot that doesn't sit right with me but I can't for the life of me understand the shade thrown at cis people tweeting stuff like trans/nb rights. Like yeah of course that's not enough to change hearts and minds but maybe we're just, happy to see it? Maybe just knowing a creator you like has your back or at the very least doesn't hate your (for folks you care abouts) fucking guts for no reason is a huge relief. We can decide for ourselves what they find meaningful and sincere and I'm not sure what the cynicism towards solidarity was meant to accomplish
There's a lot that doesn't sit right with me but I can't for the life of me understand the shade thrown at cis people tweeting stuff like trans/nb rights. Like yeah of course that's not enough to change hearts and minds but maybe we're just, happy to see it? Maybe just knowing a creator you like has your back or at the very least doesn't hate your (for folks you care abouts) fucking guts for no reason is a huge relief. We can decide for ourselves what they find meaningful and sincere and I'm not sure what the cynicism towards solidarity was meant to accomplish
Fucking yuck. I've been a big supporter of Natalie for a while until the recent controversies popped up which gave me pause but this isn't an excusable thing. Fuck off with this "SJW" shit.I'm never gonna be this SJW golden calf that- People want this channel to be this safe space. This is a problem we've had on Patreon for a long time, like who's allowed into the discord server back when we had that. I don't know. It's weird to me that people expect this channel to be like this exclusively leftist safe space because this channel has always been oriented towards like consensus centrists and mainstream people and edge lords. Why do they think I'm suddenly going to become this person who like- I don't know.
I genuinely don't think "SJW" is derogatory in this case. A lot of leftists describe themselves as "SJW".Fucking yuck. I've been a big supporter of Natalie for a while until the recent controversies popped up which gave me pause but this isn't an excusable thing. Fuck off with this "SJW" shit.
They do? It's definitely a pejorative.I genuinely don't think "SJW" is derogatory in this case. A lot of leftists describe themselves as "SJW".
You haven't heard leftists refer to themselves as SJWs? Really?
Yes. It's predominantly a pejorative.You haven't heard leftists refer to themselves as SJWs? Really?
A lot of leftists have used it to refer to themselves in order to undermine its effectiveness as an insult. To the point where the only people who use it as a legitimate insult get their political discourse exclusively from Ben Shapiro.
I've only ever heard them referring to themselves as such ironically. I've also heard them acknowledge that those among the right would refer to them as SJW's, but that's not really themselves calling themselves that, just acknowledging they will be called that by others.You haven't heard leftists refer to themselves as SJWs? Really?
Could you give some examples of a lot of these leftists using it? I've not come across it frequently, and as Veelk says, only ever ironically or sarcastically.A lot of leftists have used it to refer to themselves in order to undermine its effectiveness as an insult.
This really isn't the case. The term hasn't been reclaimed to the point of anything.To the point where the only people who use it as a legitimate insult get their political discourse exclusively from Ben Shapiro.
I genuinely don't think "SJW" is derogatory in this case. A lot of leftists describe themselves as "SJW".
I don't really feel like doing homework for the sake of an internet disagreement so I hope you'll understand if I politely decline that request.Could you give some examples of a lot of these leftists using it? I've not come across it frequently, and as Veelk says, only ever ironically or sarcastically.
This really isn't the case. The word hasn't been reclaimed to the point of anything.
I don't really see how it would be homework to reference someone if it's as widespread and reclaimed as you suggest.I don't really feel like doing homework for the sake of an internet disagreement so I hope you'll understand if I politely decline that request.
I honestly am pretty disappointed at how easily Harry threw Natalie under the bus in this situation, given it was pretty clear she didn't know about Buck Angel's tweets when she edited in literally 2 seconds of audio into her video. It seems perfectly reasonable to take at face value she wouldn't think to research it further than that and it being an honest mistake.That is some weak woe-is-me bullshit she just posted. And if that IS a shot across the bow aimed at Hbomb, are we supposed to forget about that charity stream? That didn't take 7 seconds, and it made a major financial difference.
Harris (Hbomberguy) didn't throw Natalie Wynn under a bus.I honestly am pretty disappointed at how easily Harry threw Natalie under the bus in this situation, given it was pretty clear she didn't know about Buck Angel's tweets when she edited in literally 2 seconds of audio into her video. It seems perfectly reasonable to take at face value she wouldn't think to research it further than that and it being an honest mistake.
It is one thing to condemn him (Buck) but quite another to imply that Wynn betrayed Harry personally in this situation. And that's basically what he did here in an effort to protect his brand/image.
Huh? In what way did Harry throw Natalie under the bus? I don't think she denied knowing who Buck was or for what reason he's a divisive/toxic figure.I honestly am pretty disappointed at how easily Harry threw Natalie under the bus in this situation, given it was pretty clear she didn't know about Buck Angel's tweets when she edited in literally 2 seconds of audio into her video. It seems perfectly reasonable to take at face value she wouldn't think to research it further than that and it being an honest mistake.
It is one thing to condemn him (Buck) but quite another to imply that Wynn betrayed Harry personally in this situation. And that's basically what he did here in an effort to protect his brand/image.
I'm not really sure how his tweets on the subject could have possibly be read as throwing her under the bus. Otherwise it was just "sucks I'm being associated with Buck Angel through no fault of my own, I don't agree with his views at all". Which is... absolutely fair. I should hope no one on this forum would want to be associated with Buck Angel. It's great he helped bring trans men into the public eye. It doesn't excuse the harm he's doing to non-binary and genderqueer folks by spouting the kind of rhetoric he does.I honestly am pretty disappointed at how easily Harry threw Natalie under the bus in this situation, given it was pretty clear she didn't know about Buck Angel's tweets when she edited in literally 2 seconds of audio into her video. It seems perfectly reasonable to take at face value she wouldn't think to research it further than that and it being an honest mistake.
It is one thing to condemn him (Buck) but quite another to imply that Wynn betrayed Harry personally in this situation. And that's basically what he did here in an effort to protect his brand/image.
I don't think it's a stretch to read him saying this was "forced" on him as blaming Natalie, which feels pretty weaselly and I understand why she'd see this as a betrayal on his part.
I don't think it's a stretch to read him saying this was "forced" on him as blaming Natalie, which feels pretty weaselly and I understand why she'd see this as a betrayal on his part.
That's him calling Buck Angel a shithead, not Natalie, I'm pretty sure.
Pretty much, tbqh.
Well both are shitheads. There's nothing wrong with this tweet.That's him calling Buck Angel a shithead, not Natalie, I'm pretty sure.
Pretty much, tbqh.
This really isn't the case. The term hasn't been reclaimed to the point of anything.
In my experience it's more that people who are "on the left" in a more general sense of being progressive socially refer to themselves as SJWs, often deliberately to signal that they're not wholly on board with actual Leftism in the anti capitalist sense. Contrapoints definitely strikes me as exactly such a person.Oddish: "A lot of leftist use the word SJW to describe themselves"
Everyone: "No they don't, can you back up your claim"
Oddish: *runs away*
To be fair I know of several leftists who have jokingly used SJW among themselves to be ironic, myself included. And Natalie's style is so fucking irony-laden that it's possible she didn't mean it as a pejorative. But an attempt at an apology or addressing something that clearly means so much to so many people really shouldn't have such irony in it.
Yeh, so then don't come in and gaslight about it being used unironically by a lot of prominent leftists, proud to refer to themselves as 'SJW' as some widespread reclamation project that's rendered it only an insult in niche/extreme cases.In my experience it's more that people who are "on the left" in a more general sense of being progressive socially refer to themselves as SJWs, often deliberately to signal that they're not wholly on board with actual Leftism in the anti capitalist sense. Contrapoints definitely strikes me as exactly such a person.
I don't see how you got that out of either my or mewshuji's comments, especially since I haven't even posted in this thread until this point. Are you confusing one or both of us with someone else?Yeh, so then don't come in and gaslight about it being used unironically by a lot of prominent leftists, proud to refer to themselves as 'SJW' as some widespread reclamation project that's rendered it only an insult in niche/extreme cases.
Arguing over her potentially using 'SJW' in some prideful context when she's out there also slamming people for virtue signalling and wanting safe spaces.
All while continuing to try and push this bullshit narrative divide between older and younger trans people and understanding non-binary identities.
I'm referring to the discussion that you both jumped into and what it was originally saying.I don't see how you got that out of either my or mewshuji's comments, especially since I haven't even posted in this thread until this point. Are you confusing one or both of us with someone else?
I don't think it's a stretch to read him saying this was "forced" on him as blaming Natalie, which feels pretty weaselly and I understand why she'd see this as a betrayal on his part.
I'm referring to the discussion that you both jumped into and what it was originally saying.
Oddish: "A lot of leftist use the word SJW to describe themselves"
Everyone: "No they don't, can you back up your claim"
Oddish: *runs away*
I'm not ignoring that. I'm saying that what you're saying isn't what was originally being said which was that prominent leftists have reclaimed SJW as a term to be proud of, to the point where it's only used as an insult in some niche/extreme cases."The discussion and what it was originally saying" is whether leftists often call themselves SJWs. My point is that people often have different ideas about what it means to be a true leftist. To just ignore that and act as if my comment didn't essentially agree with you is pretty confusing.