BBC: co-founder of Oceangate says his biggest fear was they're on the surface and not found, and that there was the possibility of a catastrophic implosion.

If the reports about the construction and safety of that sub are right then his Oceangate is responsible for what's happened, and they were warned too.

Full quotes from BBC:
Is it true that sub went lost before for a few hours? That should've been the real wakeup call that this service needed to be shut down.
 

Lowrys

Member
Oct 25, 2017
12,702
London
Sky News. President of Explorer Club they refer to is Richard Garriot of Ultima fame, randomly.

Debris is 'landing frame and rear cover from sub', expert says

A rescue expert says the debris found in the search for Titan was "a landing frame and a rear cover from the submersible".
David Mearns, who is friends with two of the passengers on board Titan, says he is part of a WhatsApp group involving The Explorers Club.

Mr Mearns told Sky News the president of the club, who is "directly connected" to the ships on the site, said to the group: "It was a landing frame and a rear cover from the submersible."
Mr Mearns says: "Again this is an unconventional submarine, that rear cover is the pointy end of it and the landing frame is the little frame that it seems to sit on."

He says this confirms that it is the submersible.
Mr Mearns says he knows both British billionaire Hamish Harding and the French sub pilot Paul-Henri Nargeolet.
"It means the hull hasn't yet been found but two very important parts of the whole system have been discovered and that would not be found unless its fragmented," he added.
 

Mathieran

Member
Oct 25, 2017
12,925
Hopefully this provides closure and gives evidence that the hull failed and they died very quickly. Getting stuck in a small metal tube for several days with no escape is nightmare material.
 

Asator

Member
Oct 27, 2017
922
Well, if it was a catastrophic failure at least it was a quick death.

If it is indeed a failure of the hull that can be linked to the points that the employee who was fired raised, can the company be sued despite the waiver that the passenger signed?
 

Axe

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,809
United Kingdom
I hope for their sake it was an implosion, versus the other possibilities. Seems very likely given what's been found, and also the construction of the sub and factors surrounding that.
 

Tobor

Member
Oct 25, 2017
29,042
Richmond, VA
If the tail and frame are visible, but not the rest, implosion is nearly certain. The carbon fiber tube would have shattered like porcelain.
 
Jan 27, 2019
16,087
Fuck off
Well, if it was a catastrophic failure at least it was a quick death.

If it is indeed a failure of the hull that can be linked to the points that the employee who was fired raised, can the company be sued despite the waiver that the passenger signed?
If they signed a waiver they have effectively indemnified the company and a lawsuit would go nowhere.
 

Lowrys

Member
Oct 25, 2017
12,702
London
Pretty random if the first confirmation that's it's the Titan came from the guy who made the Ultima games, with us discussing it here on a gaming forum.
 

Kyussons

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
1,414
Not surprised, hull implosion was always the most probable cause of the accident.

This is from last year, the research on composite pressure hulls in the deep sea is still in the exploratory stage.

A Review on Structural Failure of Composite Pressure Hulls in Deep Sea:


www.mdpi.com

A Review on Structural Failure of Composite Pressure Hulls in Deep Sea

With the increasing application and study of lightweight and high strength fiber reinforced polymer composites in ocean industry, the structural failure problem of composite pressure hulls has attracted great attention from many researchers in China and globally. Analysis of the structural...
 
Last edited:

Truant

Member
Oct 28, 2017
6,774
So this probably means an instant death? Like sucked out of whatever hull damage they sustained in milliseconds?
 

buset

Member
Jul 25, 2018
415
Pretty random if the first confirmation that's it's the Titan came from the guy who made the Ultima games, with us discussing it here on a gaming forum.

Wait, what? The Explorers club is not Oceans Gate. Quite the opposite.

Edit; misunderstood the post, sorry. With all the misinformation and hate in this thread its sort of obvious but sorry for this
 

hobblygobbly

Member
Oct 25, 2017
7,708
NORDFRIESLAND, DEUTSCHLAND
damn if they found the parts that were not intrinsically part of the pressurised hell, that's for sure the implosion, and since the pressurised hull is made of composites like carbon fibre, that would shatter in such a situation, and not be a tin can on the seabed

how that happened we probably won't know for sure, uncontrolled descent and slamming into the seabed, hull integrity compromised because of the external pressure, or could've drifted into wreckage from a current that compromised the hull
 

Kyussons

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
1,414
Not surprised, hull implosion was always the most probable cause of the accident.

This is from last year, the research on composite pressure hulls in the deep sea is still in the exploratory stage.

A Review on Structural Failure of Composite Pressure Hulls in Deep Sea


www.mdpi.com

A Review on Structural Failure of Composite Pressure Hulls in Deep Sea

With the increasing application and study of lightweight and high strength fiber reinforced polymer composites in ocean industry, the structural failure problem of composite pressure hulls has attracted great attention from many researchers in China and globally. Analysis of the structural...
 

adj_noun

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
17,528
welp the Titanic expert on board was worried about what looks like happened

According to the French newspaper Le Figaro, Nargeolet had expressed skepticism about the Titan's safety, telling a former colleague that he "didn't have total confidence in this submarine made of composite materials."

Part of the reason for Nargeolet's hesitancy was the Titan's relatively large porthole, which is two feet in diameter. While this feature makes it easier for passengers to get a good look at the Titanic, it represents a potential point of failure in a vessel that has had to endure pressures of nearly 6,000 pounds per square inch.

"He was a little dubious about this new technology but, at the same time, intrigued by the idea of piloting something new, a bit like being a test pilot," his former colleague Michel L'Hour told Le Figaro.
 
Jan 27, 2019
16,087
Fuck off
Surely it's the opposite? A waiver might protect against civil action but they would still be liable for criminal conduct
Although it happening in international waters muddies things
That is the biggest question mark over any legal proceedings, establishing jurisdiction could be almost impossible due to this taking place in international waters.
 

ajoshi

Member
Sep 11, 2021
2,037
BBC: co-founder of Oceangate says his biggest fear was they're on the surface and not found, and that there was the possibility of a catastrophic implosion.

If the reports about the construction and safety of that sub are right then his company is responsible for what's happened, and they were warned too.

why would being on surface be the biggest fear? (im guessing because it would be really shitty if they were relatively fine the whole time but still couldnt get oxygen)
 

PandaShake

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
2,489
When I saw the title, my heart skipped a beat thinking of a debris field on Saturn's moon, Titan with a Nasa conference with all the uap news.
 

Jencks

Member
Oct 25, 2017
8,486
Exactly what I speculated happened. Carbon fiber hull sustained too many cycles of extreme pressure and failed due to fatigue. Obviously not confirmed but I'd be shocked if this wasn't the case.
 

Kuga

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
2,300
So this probably means an instant death? Like sucked out of whatever hull damage they sustained in milliseconds?
Death would be instant or nearly instant. The sudden pressure differential would boil your blood, scramble your insides, and crush and tear your body to pieces.
 

tuffy

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,531
So this probably means an instant death? Like sucked out of whatever hull damage they sustained in milliseconds?
Yes. That much water over their heads at that depth is an unimaginable weight and all of it is trying to get into the sub. So when the shell cracks, its occupants are pulverized in the blink of an eye.
 

Juraash

Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,483
So this probably means an instant death? Like sucked out of whatever hull damage they sustained in milliseconds?

I would imagine there's no sucking out of anything at depth, that's for a vacuum. It'd be an implosion I assume, which is equally grim, but at least it'd also be mercifully quick.
 
Jun 10, 2018
8,956
Watching a YouTube video from a former submariner, his comment is that due to the.fibreglass body, if it fails, there are no cracks, the whole thing shatters like porcelain

A debris field would be consistent with that
If it's the same one that was posted in the big thread, then I just want to say I didn't mind his somber tone at the end either. Going over the details of the submersible and it's possible design flaws, him being honest in the outcome of the passengers wasn't him being coldly rash and insensitive, at least to me.
 

Sheepinator

Member
Jul 25, 2018
28,179
why would being on surface be the biggest fear? (im guessing because it would be really shitty if they were relatively fine the whole time but still couldnt get oxygen)
Yeah, given the time and logistics of a deep sea rescue, a surface rescue was always going to be the most likely path for success. If it turned out they were on the surface but not found in time, that would be horrible.
 

nilbog

Member
Oct 25, 2017
15,357
It's a shame that the whistleblower's safety concerns about that carbon fiber hull sadly came true at the cost of lives, if that is indeed what happened.

A quote from that article:

Carbon fiber composites can be stronger and lighter than steel, making a submersible naturally buoyant. But they can also be prone to sudden failure under stress. The hull that Lochridge was writing about was made by Spencer Composites, the only company to have previously made a carbon fiber hull for a manned submersible. (That submersible was commissioned by explorer Steve Fossett for a record-breaking dive, but he died in a light aircraft crash before it could be used.)

Lochridge's recommendation was that non-destructive testing of the Titan's hull was necessary to ensure a "solid and safe product." The filing states that Lochridge was told that such testing was impossible, and that OceanGate would instead rely on its much touted acoustic monitoring system.
 

Tobor

Member
Oct 25, 2017
29,042
Richmond, VA
Exactly what I speculated happened. Carbon fiber hull sustained too many cycles of extreme pressure and failed due to fatigue. Obviously not confirmed but I'd be shocked if this wasn't the case.

Could have been the portal that initially failed, or the glued on titanium rings. The end result is the same. If anything is compromised, that hull is a goner.
 

kradical

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
6,570
That is the biggest question mark over any legal proceedings, establishing jurisdiction could be almost impossible due to this taking place in international waters.

If there was criminal negligence in the design and construction, I would assume a prosecution would be possible in the jurisdictions those took place in, even if the deaths themselves occurred in international waters