• Light/Dark

Deep Learning: Scientists Processed 109 Hours of Oral Sex to Develop an AI that Sucks Dick

hydrophilic attack

hydrophilic attack

Corrupted by Vengeance
Member
Oct 25, 2017
21,650
Sweden
animERA, rejoice!

https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/...lop-an-ai-that-sucks-dick-autoblow?utm_source
The Autoblow AI, a sex toy made for penis-possessing individuals, consists of a rubbery sleeve and a motor housed inside a canister that aims to simulate oral sex. It launched its Indiegogo campaign last week and quickly hit its goal of $50,000. Its biggest advertised advantage over the original model from 2014, the Autoblow 2, is a machine learning algorithm that "continually changes technique" in order to pleasure the user in new and exciting ways.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
to visualize how this machine works, here is a gif showing the mechanism in action
giphy.gif
Instead of repetitive, mechanical motions, this "AI mode" promises to replicate the nuanced and unpredictable motions of a real, human blowjob. In order to do this, the company asked a team of six people to watch and annotate 109 hours of porn and hired machine learning engineers to create a model to take all that data and translate it into what the toy does. This entire process took three years.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
to document their work, these scientist authored an anonymous blowjob paper
"In this work, we seek to quantify the 'common' or 'typical' movements involved in oral sex performed on males," the paper begins. " To do so, we analyze a dataset containing over 108 hours of pornographic video, annotated at each frame with the position of the lips along the shaft of the penis. We use quantization techniques to discover sixteen distinct motions, and using these motions we design and evaluate a system that procedurally generates realistic movement sequences using deep learning. We quantitatively show that this system is superior to simple Markov Chain techniques."
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
The Blowjob Paper begins with a few mild charts and graphs about how the researchers quantified movements gleaned from videos of oral sex and translated them to the different movements Autoblow AI offers. Among these are cluster charts that represent activities, including pauses, edging (meaning pleasuring someone to the verge of climax), shallow tip play, and deepthroating.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
giphy.gif

The researchers designed a dense neural network (DNN) architecture that predicts a blowjob giver's next move based on analysis of past movements, kind of like predictive text on your phone.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Copic called together a team of six people to collect blowjob data from watching porn. These were not statistics or machine learning experts, just friends and confidants willing to help with an absurd task. They created a system for annotating 109 hours of blowjob videos—1,200 oral sex video clips in total—by animating a cartoon head and penis on a movable slider they could adjust with a mouse as they watched the porn videos. Copic told me in an email that they named the head "Sliderman."
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
the sliderman in action:
giphy.gif
lots more in the article

make me watch hundreds of hours of porn for science if old
 
gaugebozo

gaugebozo

Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,853
"These were not statistics or machine learning experts, just friends and confidants," and connoisseurs...

One issue with this: are porn bj's actually good, or do they just look good? We're going to need more data...
 
Red

Red

Member
Oct 26, 2017
11,910
I don't understand what's going on in that final gif. It's a head impaled on a penis pike.
 
SliceSabre

SliceSabre

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,556
Whoever knew so much science and thought could be put into a machine built to give a blowjob? That said that much have been some fun research.

I feel bad for both people in that BJ gif though. The giver has had his head pierced by the penis and is still giving a bj and I can't imagine the receiver feels too good about that but the giver still ain't going all the way down.
 

Deleted member 9241

Oct 26, 2017
10,416
Siggy-P said:
Not really a blowjob if there's no tongue. It's just a lips simulator surely?
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

The tongue is nice and all for foreplay, but those techniques fall to the wayside once she starts deepthroating. This device seems like the user will be balls deep the entire experience, which is not something the vast majority of women can do.
 
Window

Window

Member
Oct 27, 2017
8,292
Somebody who's more funny than me make a joke out of Deep Learning and Deepthroat.
 
INST

INST

Member
Nov 2, 2017
2,656
Some programmer spent countless of hours developing his skills in order to bring you this.
 
Drksage

Drksage

Member
Oct 30, 2017
1,310
Sliderman, sliderman
Does whatever a slider man does
Spits on em', any size,
Sucks on dicks just like mine
Look Out!
Here comes the sliderman
 
SliceSabre

SliceSabre

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,556
SillyEskimo said:
The tongue is nice and all for foreplay, but those techniques fall to the wayside once she starts deepthroating. This device seems like the user will be balls deep the entire experience, which is not something the vast majority of women can do.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
I would say tongue is part of the overall blowjob experience, honestly this is more of a just deepthroating machine rather than a full blowjob experience. I guess that's fine though because man doesn't nearly have the tech to simulate the complex movements of a human tongue.

inb4avatarquote
 
CoolOff

CoolOff

Avenger
Oct 26, 2017
3,460
Rational people: In times like these, it's more important than ever to trust and have confidence in scientists.

Scientists:
 
SixPointEight

SixPointEight

Member
Oct 28, 2017
6,343
gaugebozo said:
"These were not statistics or machine learning experts, just friends and confidants," and connoisseurs...

One issue with this: are porn bj's actually good, or do they just look good? We're going to need more data...
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

seriously. It sounds like they should've tried to get better, more scientific data. :thinking emoji:
 

Deleted member 9241

Oct 26, 2017
10,416
Is anyone here going to take one for the team?
 
Rendering...

Rendering...

Member
Oct 30, 2017
19,089
As a distinguished porn connoisseur, my honor compels me to point out that porn BJs don't necessarily represent the real thing in a realistic or informative manner.

These scenes are generally staged, and there's no guarantee that the performers are motivated by their partner's pleasure. Sometimes if the chemistry is good you can tell they're into it. Sometimes.

hydrophilic attack said:
the sliderman in action:
giphy.gif
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
I want to to travel to past centuries just so I can show this to people.

"Welcome to the future."
 
SliceSabre

SliceSabre

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,556
Rendering... said:
As a distinguished porn connoisseur, my honor compels me to point out that porn BJs don't necessarily represent the real thing in a realistic or informative manner.

These scenes are generally staged, and there's no guarantee that the performers are motivated by their partner's pleasure. Sometimes if the chemistry is good you can tell they're into it. Sometimes.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
That's only if they watched professional porn. I would hope they included amateur stuff as well in their research as well.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.