play it
edit: seems like it has enigma (capcom drm) now?
steam should really make it a requirement to disclose this
edit: seems like it has enigma (capcom drm) now?
steam should really make it a requirement to disclose this
Last edited:
:|CAPCPOM removed Denuvo from the game but added their own DRM, Enigma, to it which is kind of worse cuz now there's no incentive for them to remove their own DRM from their own game.
pla-ah goddammitCAPCPOM removed Denuvo from the game but added their own DRM, Enigma, to it which is kind of worse cuz now there's no incentive for them to remove their own DRM from their own game.
confirmation?CAPCPOM removed Denuvo from the game but added their own DRM, Enigma, to it which is kind of worse cuz now there's no incentive for them to remove their own DRM from their own game.
CAPCPOM removed Denuvo from the game but added their own DRM, Enigma, to it which is kind of worse cuz now there's no incentive for them to remove their own DRM from their own game.
shareholders think differentWhat's with all the paranoia around piracy? Haven't multiple titles released on gog already proven that games do well without it?
View: https://x.com/PC_Focus_/status/1737094448100618569
With Capcom doing that presentation a while back about DRM being in their games, expect more of this.
What's with all the paranoia around piracy? Haven't multiple titles released on gog already proven that games do well without it?
it is a requirement, the problem in this case is that an EULA counts as disclosing this.
it is a requirement, the problem in this case is that an EULA counts as disclosing this.
Indeed the page can be created no problem but I understood that Valve started to look unkindly if a dev was caught.It's not, but disclosure is recommended, as otherwise people are liable to view the lack thereof as a sort of bait-and-switch and leave negative reviews (and rightly so).
And on a related note, since the "DRM Provider" section is a text box rather than a drop-down box, there's absolutely nothing preventing Capcom from disclosing the fact it is using its own DRM.
it is a requirement, the problem in this case is that an EULA counts as disclosing this.
Indeed the page can be created no problem but I understood that Valve started to look unkindly if a dev was caught.
But maybe as you put it is just that Valve with not side with them on any consequences.
I mean it is obvious on purpose, they disclose but behind the link in the EULA that nobody reads.
There is at the start 2nd of 3rd section in a super legal lingo way.That's the other thing: there is no disclosure in the game's EULA. It could be argued that the "Addition or Modification to the Program" section is just slightly vague enough that it covers DRM, but, really, it's clearly referring to patches.
There is at the start 2nd of 3rd section in a super legal lingo way.