So they have lots of job opportunities with way lower compensation and a potential pool of people who are "lucky"to even have a job.
People in the industry are getting played in the great reshuffle.
So they have lots of job opportunities with way lower compensation and a potential pool of people who are "lucky"to even have a job.
It wouldn't be Bungie and Sony agreed that these layoffs wouldn't impact it.
I think what Paul is saying is that Bungie decided who to lay off not Sony. Sony would obviously know the layoffs are happening because they own Bungie.
Can't someone at Sony undo this? I know they like to cut people but come on, this clearly will do more harm than any "good", especially to their GaaS plans and Destiny itself.
So they have lots of job opportunities with way lower compensation and a potential pool of people who are "lucky"to even have a job.
People in the industry are getting played in the great reshuffle.
Very hard to prove in court with what you mentioned. It'll also depend on who was let go i.e., employees who had unvested stock vs new employees who wouldn't receive any given they were acquired, and the remaining balance of vested vs unvested. Since we know from SIE's earnings that 2/3rds of the total retention value was to be paid out within the first 2 years post closure (July 2022), with the remaining 1/3rd likely trickling out over years 3 & 4 if on a standard 4-year vesting cycle.
Edit: Also don't know where unvested stock goes to. Usually it's back to the company, but since they were fully acquired, I have no idea where it ends up accounting wise.
it's impossible to know from outside, but considering that Bungie has freed itself from bigger companies _twice_ I assume they structured the acquisition so that Bungie is still a company with shares and stuff, just that Sony owns a bunch of it, and didn't just get absorbed into Sony and became just another label inside a big company
who's going to confirm this...? Bungie isn't going to come out and say yea
Very hard to prove in court with what you mentioned. It'll also depend on who was let go i.e., employees who had unvested stock vs new employees who wouldn't receive any given they were acquired, and the remaining balance of vested vs unvested. Since we know from SIE's earnings that 2/3rds of the total retention value was to be paid out within the first 2 years post closure (July 2022), with the remaining 1/3rd likely trickling out over years 3 & 4 if on a standard 4-year vesting cycle.
Edit: Also don't know where unvested stock goes to. Usually it's back to the company, but since they were fully acquired, I have no idea where it ends up accounting wise.
How would you even confirm it? Bungie isn't gonna make a statement. Paul is close with a lot of Bungie folks. So I'm willing to give the benefit of the doubt.
I mean, in the corporate world, I can imagine the owner (Sony) requiring one of their subsidiaries (Bungie) to cut costs by x%, and that it's up to the subsidiary to find a way to do that.
Usually it goes back in the "pool" for it to be offered to the next sucker hired who thinks they'll make it the 4 years.
Read the article that points out how the japanese industry is insular and a black box in regards to these thanks to the ingrained crunch culture, and we do know for a fact that not only Nintendo but several japanese studios consistently crunchs or have crunched in the past.You are using you assumptions as facts. Please... If you are going to accuse a company of crunching you need to at least have a source that says that.
They could cut 100% of the cost by imploding the company, because that sure it what this feels like. This is all too sad and revolting.I mean, in the corporate world, I can imagine the owner (Sony) requiring one of their subsidiaries (Bungie) to cut costs by x%, and that it's up to the subsidiary to find a way to do that.
I did the same - left the industry but came back to a smaller independent start up, got let go within 5 months due to downsizing, then got a contract job in the industry, only for the boss to be abusive, then got another job in the industry only for the boss to change my job title at the last second and ask me to do shit out of scope.Found out about this from a friend yesterday, luckily he is still there.
Layoffs are too often in the industry, that was the biggest reason I left a few years ago...but I came back to a small indie studio. I don't know why though.
I imagine this pretty much confirms it. From Patrick Wren (Sr. Encounter Designer at Respawn; assuming he has colleagues/friends that were impacted);
View: https://twitter.com/Witdarkstar/status/1719407112844136690
Edit: Under Tassi's original post.
It really sucks. I thankfully work in a healthy brazilian indie studio but I also worked for a shitty studio before. As long as there are more professionals on the market than opportunities available, employers will see workers as dispensable. So sorry you had to go through this.I did the same - left the industry but came back to a smaller independent start up, got let go within 5 months due to downsizing, then got a contract job in the industry, only for the boss to be abusive, then got another job in the industry only for the boss to change my job title at the last second and ask me to do shit out of scope.
Abuse is rampant because there's always someone willing to come after you and hope it isn't them.
There's were due to redundancies and or restructuring 343 which is why theyre still heavily hiring. Not really in the same breath of them doing this leaving them with one day of benefits.
There's were due to redundancies and or restructuring 343 which is why theyre still heavily hiring. Not really in the same breath of them doing this leaving them with one day of benefits.
I imagine this pretty much confirms it. From Patrick Wren (Sr. Encounter Designer at Respawn; assuming he has colleagues/friends that were impacted);
View: https://twitter.com/Witdarkstar/status/1719407112844136690
Edit: Under Tassi's original post.
That's not how it works buddy. They're not hiring in the positions they let go lmaoThe whole industry is basically in a massive layoff spree. This is a terrible year for developers. So many people are losing their jobs, and their companies always have some pissant bullshit excuse for why it's "justified". And then once those "reduncancies" are dealt with, they hire lower-cost employees they can bully for a few years before they lay them off too.
This is actually less common than you think. Most employers will accelerate RSUs if you end up laid off or made redundant due to separate business concerns and not issues with performance or behavior. RSUs are more used as a way of making people stay for the duration of the vestment period, since if the employee leaves they won't accelerate RSUs. Situations like what Bungie did burns a lot of bridges at minimum, and at worst opens them up to a lawsuit.Not defending it at all but it would be *more* surprising if the RSUs didnt get reverted to Bungie following layoffs. thats how it works across basically all of tech, your RSUs vest if and only if you are still employed on date X (where usually X is once a year or quarter for 4ish years). often RSUs will continue vesting during the severance period, but thats about it
More. Classic lay-off garbage tactics.
View: https://x.com/paultassi/status/1719421275494359273?s=61&t=ibsS0wDgi_2qddo-rUQe1g
More. Classic lay-off garbage tactics.
View: https://x.com/paultassi/status/1719421275494359273?s=61&t=ibsS0wDgi_2qddo-rUQe1g
This is actually less common than you think. Most employers will accelerate RSUs if you end up laid off or made redundant due to separate business concerns and not issues with performance or behavior. RSUs are more used as a way of making people stay for the duration of the vestment period, since if the employee leaves they won't accelerate RSUs. That's because situations like what Bungie did burns a lot of bridges at minimum, and at worst opens them up to a lawsuit.
I did the same - left the industry but came back to a smaller independent start up, got let go within 5 months due to downsizing, then got a contract job in the industry, only for the boss to be abusive, then got another job in the industry only for the boss to change my job title at the last second and ask me to do shit out of scope.
Abuse is rampant because there's always someone willing to come after you and hope it isn't them.
More. Classic lay-off garbage tactics.
View: https://x.com/paultassi/status/1719421275494359273?s=61&t=ibsS0wDgi_2qddo-rUQe1g
Yea it's kind of crazy. I hear some people LOVING capitalism because of the idea that if you don't want to do a certain work then someone else will, and it should technically balance itself out. Totally bananas and I can only assume these people have never been on the bad end of the stick.
I'm absolutely terrified of leaving my company currently even though I'm very "under-paid" (im in tech so.. you know) when compared to my peers. The idea of job hunting in this climate where so many people are desperate and employers are literal ghouls... Uff.
About to have a child and can't risk it.
Best of luck to all those affected and I hope they land somewhere nice.