On my 3080 with all of the tweaks in the DF video @4k with DLSS quality and DRS I go between 60-120, it normally averages about 80, that seems pretty low doesn't it?
-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
-
We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Digital Foundry || Doom Eternal's Ray Tracing Upgrade Analysed - Best PC Settings + PS5/Xbox Series X Comparisons
- Thread starter ILikeFeet
- Start date
On my 3080 with all of the tweaks in the DF video @4k with DLSS quality and DRS I go between 60-120, it normally averages about 80, that seems pretty low doesn't it?
As stated in the video the RT tweaks are quite heavy so that's probably about right. DRS isn't doing anything in your case so you could just disable it.
Ampere was not their Intel moment, considering they performed a pretty decent generational jump in performance above what many people expected. They also trounced AMD by going more into waht every passing year seems more likely to be the future of GPUs (AI cores).
The "Intel moment" would have been a 2080-Super-Super (a Super version of the cards isnt that big of a deal if they follow the tick-TOCK approach with new gens every 2-3 years).
AMD wouldnt increase their market share vs Ampere.
Interesting to see consoles still lowering AF levels. I always thought this would be the gen where we would get 16x AF for free always
With Dictator tweaked settings on a 3080 with a 5900x and 32gb of 3600 ram I find myself dipping into the 70-80% range of DRS quite often in gore nests and such.
This is everything set to ultra nightmare and DLSS on quality with DRS set to 60fps @ 4k res.
Looks incredible but isn't a stable 60 just with DLSS, DSR is needed, at least on my system?
This is everything set to ultra nightmare and DLSS on quality with DRS set to 60fps @ 4k res.
Looks incredible but isn't a stable 60 just with DLSS, DSR is needed, at least on my system?
Doesn't seem worth it to me. 120+ fps and higher resolution > better-looking reflections.
It really does look incredible but it does murder the FPS from what I am seeing in certain areas.
Didn't the video say not to use ultra nightmare settings because it's not worth it or do I remember wrong?
Dude try not to take these things so personally. I also don't think a 2060 costs twice as much as a console
I think for the 3080 setup he was using ultra nightmare if I remember right?
In fairness ME LE doesn't have an actual next-gen version. If they made one, I wouldn't be surprised if it really did bring 16x AF.
Wow, this game looks amazing with RTX. Part of me wishes I could afford a 3060 just to finally grab this game and play through it with both RTX and KB+M controls. Then another part of me remembers cleanly finishing a DOOM 2016 playthrough on my newly bought GTX 1060 back when I was in college, and finding out there were only like two other games out that justified my card purchase. I ended up selling that card shortly after, and not regretting it. This time, I will probably just wait a few more years on this game, until raytracing is more developed and affordable. Cannot deny the difference it makes though. I remember being confused as to why this game did not launch with RTX support, but now I think it was a smart call on id's part.
I have this for Xbox. I've been holding off on playing it until this update came out. Looks like as good of a time as any to start it.
It makes zero sense. I've been using 16x AF since the PC version of GTA3 came out and even then on my awful GeForce MX440 it had almost no performance hit whatsoever. Upgraded to a Radeon X800 Pro for Half-Life 2 and once again, no performance hit. I wish a dev could explain why something so trivial on PC that impacts IQ so much is apparently so hard to implement on consoles no matter how powerful they get.
OP
OP
miners are about to flood the market in china from the looks of things. prices are coming down
That's a great and very comprehensive video. Doom Eternal was very much an early taste of 'next-gen' games as far as disk IO is concerned. The game is only ~70GB in size and yet will still perform 40-50GB of disk reads in a single mission.
The video didn't address this but lowering the texture streaming pool size also has a direct effect on disk IO. I'd be very curious to see how the lowest setting affects slower HDDs since it increased the amount of disk reads by ~50% when I tested it on my own PC.
The video didn't address this but lowering the texture streaming pool size also has a direct effect on disk IO. I'd be very curious to see how the lowest setting affects slower HDDs since it increased the amount of disk reads by ~50% when I tested it on my own PC.
Wow, DLSS is going to make Nvidia's GPUs punch well above their weight for the entirety of this generation, aren't they?
Amazing.
Amazing.
I think this is a known issue. Lots of people were reporting it on Reddit.
OP
OP
sounds like the same issue that was brought up in the video. turning it off and then back on fixes the issue. id has to patch a proper fix though
Sorry to quote but this is still an issue even on 6.66 patch, when you enable DLSS the framerate tank hard.
To fix it you have to change a graphic setting (like shadows) to low and then raise it again just to "refresh" the engine and have a proper framerate.
My issue is that even after fixing the frame drop I still don't gain a single FPS from DLSS.
From performance to quality I get ZERO impact on the game.
Resolution stay the same, framerate stay the same, it just doesn't work... did they completely broke it with the new patch or I miss something?
Maybe Dictator can give it a look? I appreciated your DF video so I was trying to get some other fps with the 2060. Thanks :)