Diver attacked by Elon Musk as ‘pedo guy’ is prepping a libel suit
- Thread starter Deleted member 1378
- Start date
If he knows something and isn't going directly to the authorities, then he is a piece of shit for putting his own public image above victims of a disgusting crime.
But the chance of that being true is almost zero. Especially since he has had months.
-_____________-
You don't think a person with an ego as big as his would miss the opportunity to give reporters evidence of the diver's alleged pedophilia? Why did he "apologize" back then in the first place if he had evidence?
It's the opposite of specific... It's stereotyping to the extreme and it is disrespectful to the country as whole. I live near one of the biggest human trafficking hubs in the US, but I have no child brides.....
Yeah, like he knew about how he was taking Tesla private, right. Only time will tell. Hurrr hurrrrrrrrrrrrr.
It's not even that. He's basically shit talking the guy saying he was banned from the site and wasn't very important, when actual people on the team are saying otherwise. Musk is firing blanks here. Just like he does on Twitter all the time.
Who knows. Maybe he hired some private investigator and is playing the long game. Or it's possible his attorneys told him to hold off for the lawsuit, a suit to which he welcomes apparently.
Think he's welcoming that SEC investigation too? #AllPartOfHisPlan
If we're gonna rely on conjecture, perhaps you can explain why you didn't rape and kill a small child 5 years ago in Boise. Go!
User Banned (Permanent): Peddling conspiracy theories. Junior account.
He knew the years the diver lived there, when he moved to various islands, and the age of the alleged minor. Either he got that specific info from someone or that's a pretty wild—and, yes, oddly specific—guess. And, he's welcoming the lawsuit, knowing good and well such info will come to light.
He also said that the guy was banned from the dive site and that no one on the team wanted to talk to him. Which at least 3 major team members have refuted as completely baseless.
Sounds like Hiphopopotamus may know something about Turing that we don't tbh. He listed some oddly specific details. Only time will tell.
No, Elon, it's like being one of those people in Vegas who swears they have a system.
This is insane. For years (like, early Aughts, I wished some rich person would just use their capital to blast past fossil fuel companies to push cleaner energy. But holy fuck, do I feel like I used a monkey's paw on this one.
People think "off the record" is a magic phrase that kicks in like "parley" in the PotC franchise. Why would literally anyone ever be quoted on anything if they could just start statements with "off the record" and bar their publication?
He also had 'very specific' details about the guy being banned from the cave site, which have been shown false.., sounds like he is fed less by Pinkerton and more by Qanon
This is ridiculous. Going by this standard, Trump must know an awful lot of stuff we don't since he's constantly spouting garbage on Twitter as well.
If you'd ever seen a sitcom in your life you might be a bit less impressed with the serial liars making incredibly specific lies to fool smooth brains.
Very, very odd that Turing hasn't replied again since this information has come to light. I almost wonder if it means he has something to hide?
"Find the evidence for my baseless claim, you fucking lazy media dunces" has got to be the weirdest take for a guy who is a scientific genius. Musk knows that's not how presenting or falsifying a hypothesis works.
This diver is going to win millions.
This diver is going to win millions.
Yeah, that's a good one.
Or for the one-sided bit, I just finished the third season of Yu-Gi-Oh for the first time, and it's literally how the bad guys use their magic.
They play a card called the Seal of Orichalcos, which makes it so the loser of the duel loses their soul. But there's no 2-way agreement lol. It's just:
Bad Guy: "I play...."
Good Guys: "Not the goddamn Seal of Ori...."
Bad Guy: "the Seal of Orichalcos!"
Bad Guy: "I play...."
Good Guys: "Not the goddamn Seal of Ori...."
Bad Guy: "the Seal of Orichalcos!"
Someone send a link to this post to the guy's lawyer.
This will make the case even easier.
They're still same old nerds they were in high school but with their own money and other creepy nerds calling them messiah.
Because it's a waste of time. I suggested that Elon may know more information than us and I provided reasons why, and I'm saying that as a lawyer myself and how I would advise him. All i've gotten in return is strawmens and ad hominem attacks. No actual discussion about the merits, which is all I was trying to raise.
Where did I say he "must know something"? I said he may, and that only time would tell, as with all lawsuits, because of his behavior in the Buzzfeed article just posted--namely, him asking Buzzfeed to look into the diver on their own with their Thailand contacts, giving some specifics about the diver's history in Thailand, the age of the alleged minor, and him saying he hopes for a lawsuit in which the facts would come to light. Is it really that unreasonable in light of all that to ponder whether Elon hired an investigator, or to say that time will tell when more facts come out? Others posted counter-evidence about how the story alleging the diver was shunned by the others was false. That's fine. That's the point of a discussion. Maybe Elon's ego really is that big and he's doubling down with nothing; maybe he knows something we don't. That's all I said.
Last edited:
His lawyer probably told him to ignore and just document whatever is thrown at him. No use fighting outside the court and in worst case give other party something to hit them with.
Musk's lawyers, Tesla's board members and Grimes must all shudder/cringe at the self-destructive shitbag that they're connected with. It's like a less significant/dangerous version of Trump with his staff who know that their boss is a mess and a fool, but can't really do anything to reign in the self-destruction.
Does Musk even have a case? Even if he can conjure up evidence after-the-fact, it should be trivial to prove that he was not in possession of the information at the time he made the statement, and if he was he was behaving irresponsibly by not providing that information to the appropriate authorities. There's no real situation outside of a bad mustache where you can publicly call someone a "pedo" who hasn't been charged with the crime and not be guilty of libel.
To be fair, the other posters were just implying you may be a child rapist. Only time will tell.
I still remember criticising Musky in the first Thai kids rescue thread and getting dogpiled on, yeesh. All quiet on the defense force front now. He's always been a douche, all the way back in his Paypal days where he got kicked out (for being a douche). Dude's ego is ripping him apart.
Glad I sold out at $350.
Should be interesting to see if it gaps down at open.
Some of yall questioning why he is doubling down and that he must have some credible evidence as if normal rules of conflict apply to him..... he's a billionaire.....
