I do not want the thread to be locked because of rampant accusations against members being thrown around, it's that simple Kinthey.A bit weird to start the thread off with "is this normalizing pedophilia" but then go "hey, no one is being called a pedophile"
I am. I'm saying that, in a broad sense. 18 year olds may be done growing physically, but they'll undergo a ton more mental development well into their 20's. Generally speaking speaking, from the mid-20's onward you're dealing with a fully mature adult, and therefore any attraction among the ~25+ cohort, regardless of age gap, is fair game. Anyone beyond their mid 20's who pursues teenagers isn't necessarily deserving of jail time, but they are definitely predatory and pathetic.
Does legal always = good?
I don't know about pedos but all porn reinforces misogyny. That should be a given.
Do you only watch what's on the front page of pornhub? There is a metric ton of ethically produced pornography by women for women. It's just not free.
So, in your opinion, "barely legal" porn is definitively a good thing? What strong argument did you take from the article I linked?
Do you only watch what's on the front page of pornhub? There is a metric ton of ethically produced pornography by women for women. It's just not free.
This is absolutely false. Softcore never did that before I moved on and I doubt it did it afterwards.I don't know about pedos but all porn reinforces misogyny. That should be a given.
I think you're in the wrong thread, maybe? Or you hit some major reading comprehension wall because we're talking about porn here.
We're not talking about people trying to actually have a sexual relationship with 18 year olds.
The point was to not to turn this thread into a shitshow by throwing around accusations that people defending it are pedophiles.A bit weird to start the thread off with "is this normalizing pedophilia" but then go "hey, no one is being called a pedophile"
I think my only problem is when said "barely legal" pretend to be underage,
He says, while accusing others of making disingenuous posts.
"It's just porn" is always a bullshit defense in discussions of moral character. The entire point of watching porn is the exploration of a fantasy that appeals to the viewer. If that fantasy is predicated upon and inherently rooted in gross power dynamics, the viewer attracted to that fantasy finds gross power dynamics appealing. And to me, that makes them a person of questionable integrity.
My partner's ex was a pedophile apologist/closet pedophile who had a thing for the girl from Kickass and said such clichés as "age is just a number" and "girls mature faster than boys".
The first girl he dated after my ex was 18.
All legal, and just an anecdote, but clearly creepy as fuck.
Personally, anyone below 20 is so obviously young in both behaviour and appearance that my attraction just kind of switches off. I could imagine sleeping with someone that age, in a casual situation, but a relationship is just unimaginable.
I'd much rather date an adult woman with a career and her own shit going on.
Didnt some country try to ban small boobs in porn or something?
If an adult women has that body type and is using it to make a living im not gonna try to hurt them. Its the marketing team that goes overboard trying to get all those tags and clicks and sales.
A spokesperson for the ACB told me today that publications which contain offensive depictions or descriptions of persons who are or appear to be persons under the age of 18 (whether they are engaged in sexual activity or not) must be classified RC. They said the Board classifies publications on a case by case basis, in accordance with the Guidelines for the Classification of Publications, the Code and the Classification Act and that the Publications Guidelines do not specify breast size.
The Australian Classification Board (ACB) has confirmed to Somebody Think Of The Children that a person's overall appearance is used by the Board to determine whether someone appears to look under the age of 18 in a film or publication. ... Asked whether breast size was considered by the Board when determining age, McDonald said he had no further comment to make.
I did not know about that, but that sounds quite gross.Remember that YouTuber who did a strip video with his 18 year old gf and had her pretend to be his underage sister?
The article in the OP is about much more than that.Again, this thread is about porn. Why are people bringing in real life relationships into it?
So, in your opinion, "barely legal" porn is definitively a good thing? What strong argument did you take from the article I linked?
What? I have no idea what that has to do with my comment, it was a blatantly disingenuous post and I would like this thread to remain civil and reasonable, I did not insult them or anything, I even said please, do you have an issue with that?
Legal and not hurting anyone? Sure. Like, you seems to be implying in your opening statement that random people who go to PornHub or whatever and click on the "Teen" section (no actual teens) are some kind of crazy predators ready to prey on actual teens. I don't think that's a thing?
There's tons of psychologists studying the effects of porn on our brains and it does cause issues in excess (what a surprise), yet I don't ever remember reading about how it trivializes rape or pedophilia. You can be damn sure a ton of those people would be making a case for it if it was a thing.
The term 'Barely Legal' speaks for itself imo, it's a disgusting pretense to reassure the viewer that what he's watching is 'legal' while looking for illegal shit.
I must have misread your comment then, apologies.
Does that imply that the porn you don't want to watch isn't ethically produced or controlled by women? Watch that Dani Daniels interview I posted. Her own words pretty much tell you much of the porn industry is both controlled by and run by women.
If you're referring to categorization, yes, there is a stereotype that women on average prefer to fantasize and are attracted to romance over visceral instant satisfaction. There is truth to that, go check the gender imbalance with romance novels. Men on average, almost always seek visual stimulation, not read or imaginary.
But that doesn't mean "no women" don't like hardcore pornography. Nor does it imply anything about the industry itself and how ethical you categorize something simply due to the graphic nature.
Was this the Fortnite thing? It sounds vaguely familiar. It was incredibly fucked up. Did YouTube actually pull the video or take any kind of action? I probably already know the answer is "no" knowing how YouTube operates, but I want to believe maybe they did something right.Remember that YouTuber who did a strip video with his 18 year old gf and had her pretend to be his underage sister?
The term you're looking for is SWERF, those are the feminist who look down on women who work in the Sex Industry (even if it's independent).Anti-pornography feminism is shit, although not as bad as the damn TERFs.
As I've gotten older, I'm not into it. I was definitely into it when I was 18 or 19 because the actresses were made to look my age. At that time I also used to think "ugh, who would ever be into milf porn...?" I think there's a lot of problems with porn, it often brings out characteristics in ourselves that we'd never be proud of... Concepts of domination, acts that would be physically abusive in other contexts, in-balanced power dynamics, unclear levels of consent, and much, much more (not even getting into the vast world of fetishism or even that the porn industry itself, like other forms of sex work, have really dark underbellies of drug addiction, human trafficking, and abuse). The 'Barely Legal' or 'Just turned 18' sexual preference is another one of these, but of all of them, probably less destructive or harmful than the others. A lot of porn reinforces misogyny, a lot of the porn industry is built on misogynistic fetishes for both men and women. A lot of people -- men and women -- when they're enjoying porn suspend ethical beliefs that they hold in other contexts because that's what's sexually gratifying to them when it's a performance. A book came out a few years ago, "Everybody Lies, What Data Tells Us About Ourselves," or something like that, and a chapter is spent on PornHub data and how it tells us things about ourselves collectively that we'd never admit. One of the most popular types of porn for women is rape fantasy porn and physical domination, but no woman wants to be raped or physically dominated; A very popular search for gay men is straight male seduction porn, but gay men don't want to convert their straight male friends to be gay. A popular search for straight men is sibling fantasies, but straight men don't want to have sex with their siblings. A common porn trope is a seductive female teacher having sex with her student. Outside of the context of pornography, that's rape. They're sexual fantasies that porn gratifies, but these aren't acceptable, healthy sexual mores outside of the make-believe world of porn (even when that make-believe world is made to seem real and not an obvious performance). Most people watch porn knowing that it's fantasy, like how Pro Wrestling is fantasy: A male pro wrestler hitting a woman with a chair would be, in any other context, horrible and abusive, but in wrestling it's a performance and you suspend disbelief for whatever reason you enjoy that performance; A pro wrestler holding their opponent in a submission hold and refusing to break the hold even while their opponent taps out would be criminal in any other context other than the fantasy of performance. Similarly, with 'Barely Legal Porn,' it's a performance, the women are often times not barely legal, but much older. I do think there's a difference with porn that tries to show people younger than that though, I Think any porn that tries to show people younger than the age of consent -- even if you know that this actress/actor/performer is over the age of consent (and probably much older) -- is one that is moving into a harmful territory.
I'm not voting in the poll because I don't think the choices are right. I'm not into barely legal porn but if you are I'm not going to tell you that you're gross or that your kink is gross, and I'm not going to tell you that you're encouraging rape. It's your fantasy. I don't think it's "fine" like I don't think most of the porn industry is fine, but it's one of those uncomfortable things that I've indulged in because human sexuality is difficult to repress in a healthy way. Porn might simply be unethical, full stop.
Read what I was responding to. There is no way that was my implication.