Oh I know. I'm just talking about how Twitter was already losing advertiser revenue, now they're going to get hit harder since advertiser money dries up at the start of a new year.
Oh I know. I'm just talking about how Twitter was already losing advertiser revenue, now they're going to get hit harder since advertiser money dries up at the start of a new year.
Exclusive: Surveillance Footage of Tesla Crash on SF’s Bay Bridge Hours After Elon Musk Announces "Self-Driving" Feature
Elon Musk has said Tesla’s problematic autopilot features are “really the difference between Tesla being worth a lot of money or worth basically zero.”theintercept.com
The best people.
Same as Reddit. 🪙 Coins and Awards
To be fair, I don't think this decision can be attributed entirely to Musk, after all, Twitter could have needed more ways to monetize the platform, but still not sure if this is the best decision. This is going to make the interface more cluttered, with more buttons and useless awards.
View: https://twitter.com/wongmjane/status/1612705022109978625?s=20
These super-like coins/Reddit coin/TikTok roses and shit stuff is such a wild and dumb monetization strategy. It's just like tipping but you give Twitter a cut because... reasons...
Remember. Don't over-think anything Elon is doing. You're thinking about this harder than he is.
He's adding superfluous bullshit like this simply because it will make money for the site and it copies what a popular place did.
If you're thinking of the illicit means for this, you're overthinking it.
This is the dude that made a big deal about showing the (FAKE) view count on tweets, and had a poll to move it to the right and weeks later can't update some simple CSS to fix that.
Now that's true. The dude is so easily swayed by a fucking turd from a cat.Eh, I'm not necessarily attributing any thought to Elon. We've seen his texts, we know he has a bunch of creeps with their own agendas like Thiel whispering in his ear.
It was a pretty eye rolling tweet lol
Twitter doing everything it can to promote idiots I dont follow to me. Why the fuck would I want an email about a tweet from a person I dont follow.
I didnt even click through to see it.
Pretty sure that's been a thing before Elon
Twitter doing everything it can to promote idiots I dont follow to me. Why the fuck would I want an email about a tweet from a person I dont follow.
I dont recall it sending me people i dont follow before but I could totally be mistaken.
Naw I've had that before. I think the algorithm might be based on showing you tweets from people that are being followed by the people you follow... if that makes sense.I dont recall it sending me people i dont follow before but I could totally be mistaken.
Absolutely always has.I dont recall it sending me people i dont follow before but I could totally be mistaken.
Twitter suspended the account Tuesday that the D.C.-area's largest transit system uses to inform bus riders of delays, scheduling changes and other information without explanation to the transit agency.
Metro officials said they weren't told why the social media company suspended the account, @metrobusinfo. Before the suspension, Metro officials said, the account had not posted anything other than standard content, which includes route scheduling information, delay and detour updates, customer service-related tips and replies to customer complaints or concerns.
It's why I feel it's not a fantastic addition anywhere. It monetizes content too far towards producing strong emotional responses at the expense of anything else. Emotion is what leads to change but these coin systems tend to be to the extent of devaluating logic and encouraging the spread and upholding of reactionarism, status quos, etc.The coin thing would be a fantastic addition if it weren't under Musk's reign of right-wing self promotion and overall push of bigoted opinions, racism and other bullshit.
Honestly, I think the idea itself is a much, much better way of monetizing than whatever else the fuckhead came up with. Probably why he stole it from Post (I think it was Post at least, I did see this before somewhere.).
Exclusive: Surveillance Footage of Tesla Crash on SF’s Bay Bridge Hours After Elon Musk Announces "Self-Driving" Feature
Elon Musk has said Tesla’s problematic autopilot features are “really the difference between Tesla being worth a lot of money or worth basically zero.”theintercept.com
I feel like you can easily gauge if it's made with the intent of sucking money out of users and to promote shitty takes, or to really support users: If the amount of coins or money spent towards a post or user shows up anwhere publicly (e.g. in this case via achievements) to brag/encourage, it's the first. If it's just a button to donate and literally does nothing to indicate a post/user has gotten donations from it, it's the second. Elon of course goes all-in on variant 1.It's why I feel it's not a fantastic addition anywhere. It monetizes content too far towards producing strong emotional responses at the expense of anything else. Emotion is what leads to change but these coin systems tend to be to the extent of devaluating logic and encouraging the spread and upholding of reactionarism, status quos, etc.
I believe this slippery slope is why Era does not even have a Like Button, and this place is surely in better hands than Musk.
Every time I read about something like this wit ha Tesla, I'm just thinking like...sure, that's all probably in the manual, and I will give credit to the dealership in that they probably explain it all but...Looking at the video, if the driver was on autopilot, I would guess the person stopped responding to the prompts to handle the wheel. The car comes to a stop in the event of non-response of the driver. It looked like a controlled stop vs a hard stop to me.
Looking at the video, if the driver was on autopilot, I would guess the person stopped responding to the prompts to handle the wheel. The car comes to a stop in the event of non-response of the driver. It looked like a controlled stop vs a hard stop to me.
I have had my friends and brother-in-law's cars do the phantom braking even when they constantly have responses. To the point where now I insist on driving mostly so I can do full manual.
Yesterday I got an actual iOS notification that looked like it was a reply to an old tweet I made, and when I clicked through I realized it was just a suggested tweet from someone I've never heard of and don't follow who quote tweeted a different tweet. They are apparently just doing anything to try and get you to open the app.
Twitter doing everything it can to promote idiots I dont follow to me. Why the fuck would I want an email about a tweet from a person I dont follow.
So is a latest feed gone now? My app now just shows "for you" and "following" tabs ugh
I wonder how things will change once Tesla removes the requirement of needing to apply pressure to the steering wheel during autopilotLooking at the video, if the driver was on autopilot, I would guess the person stopped responding to the prompts to handle the wheel. The car comes to a stop in the event of non-response of the driver. It looked like a controlled stop vs a hard stop to me.
I wonder how things will change once Tesla removes the requirement of needing to apply pressure to the steering wheel during autopilot
Marvel fangirl mocking Scorsese for having trouble making a "Marvel-tier film"
Looking at the video, if the driver was on autopilot, I would guess the person stopped responding to the prompts to handle the wheel. The car comes to a stop in the event of non-response of the driver. It looked like a controlled stop vs a hard stop to me.
A controlled stop doesn't cause an accident like that, lmao. At least call it something else.
I watched 2 videos. It wasn't a hard break, but that wasn't a fucking controlled break, because controlled breaks don't result in 8 car pile-ups. It was a sudden far-too-fast break for the conditions the car was in at the moment of breaking.
I don't know the point you're making with your most recent post, as it's a case of "not even wrong." No duh, an unmoving car can cause a pile-ups if someone crashes into it?A car sitting on the side of the road and not moving can cause a 100 car pile up. I don't know what your point is.
I don't know the point you're making with your most recent post, as it's a case of "not even wrong." No duh, an unmoving car can cause a pile-ups if someone crashes into it?
My point is calling something that wasn't a controlled break a controlled break is pretty much faint astroturfing for Tesla not being at fault, so I don't understand why you chose to use the terms you chose.
InterestingMy stopped car statement was because you implied that the ONLY way an accident could have occured if the car stopped suddenly and my point is that a car can be sitting on the side of the road and cause an accident, humans make errors and crash for wacky reasons.
It was a controlled stop. It didn't abruptly stop, the vehicle did not decelerate at a significant rate, the car didn't lurch like you would expect from a sudden stop. Should it stop in the middle of a highway? No of course not. Why did it stop, I don't know and neither do you. Why you blaming Tesla when it could have been driver error? I'm merely saying what I'm seeing and my personal experience with my Tesla that i do not believe it was a phantom brake.
A controlled stop doesn't cause an accident like that, lmao. At least call it something else.
I watched 2 videos. It wasn't a hard break, but that wasn't a fucking controlled break, because controlled breaks don't result in 8 car pile-ups. It was a sudden far-too-fast break for the conditions the car was in at the moment of breaking.
A car sitting on the side of the road and not moving can cause a 100 car pile up. I don't know what your point is.
I don't know the point you're making with your most recent post, as it's a case of "not even wrong." No duh, an unmoving car can cause a pile-ups if someone crashes into it?
My point is calling something that wasn't a controlled break a controlled break is pretty much faint astroturfing for Tesla not being at fault, so I don't understand why you chose to use the terms you chose.
Well this exchange played out beautifully lmaoMy stopped car statement was because you implied that the ONLY way an accident could have occured if the car stopped suddenly and my point is that a car can be sitting on the side of the road and cause an accident, humans make errors and crash for wacky reasons.
It was a controlled stop. It didn't abruptly stop, the vehicle did not decelerate at a significant rate, the car didn't lurch like you would expect from a sudden stop. Should it stop in the middle of a highway? No of course not. Why did it stop, I don't know and neither do you. Why you blaming Tesla when it could have been driver error? I'm merely saying what I'm seeing and my personal experience with my Tesla that i do not believe it was a phantom brake.
Interesting.Why you blaming Tesla when it could have been driver error? I'm merely saying what I'm seeing and my personal experience with my Tesla that i do not believe it was a phantom brake.
I can't confirm for myself, and this is admittedly more of a minor thing.
But the Twitter app's apparently reversed the change of showing full frame pictures in the timeline, they're now cropped previews again.
View: https://twitter.com/PopCrave/status/1612864221338898459