Seemingly thinking all polls ever carried out are bad actors, as in, poorly picked samples. Which is just outrageous. As the video I posted above says, yes, sometimes if a website carries out a web-poll, there is issues to be had with the sample taken. It's often only going to be readers of that website, and some sites, for example, can have massive skews towards male-only/female-only. Or maybe age skews, such as overwhelmingly browsed by young/old.
Such polls might be bad examples of a generalization fitting of the whole population and even trying to weight them in the analysis could prove problematic if skews are just that high in certain directions.
Polls like the one in the OP are far more in-line with what we expect, a proper sample of all demographics from race, age, gender, income, location in the country, etc.
The frustration is myself and other posters took some time to explain to Winny how stats work without being snarky, but every reply just gets responded to with more doubling down.
