• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

Syriel

Banned
Dec 13, 2017
11,088
Not too many details as it is currently just breaking. These are in addition to the felony charge from last month.

"Empire" actor Jussie Smollett has been indicted by a grand jury in Chicago on 16 felony counts after allegedly lying to police about being the victim of a racist and homophobic hate crime.

Smollett was charged last month with felony disorderly conduct for the allegedly false report he made with Chicago police on Jan. 29, according to the Cook County State's Attorney's Office. In it he claimed he was assaulted by two masked men who hurled racist and homophobic slurs.

Source:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/tv/celebr...-on-16-felony-counts-by-grand-jury/ar-BBUxYYb
 

Error 52

Banned
Nov 1, 2017
2,032
Did we ever get a follow-up on whether or not the mail threat was real? I kinda feel like we didn't.

Total dipshit regardless.
 

TheGhost

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
28,137
Long Island
Man.....imagine throwing it all away for a jail cell.

I just want the truth....why was it done.

Pay raise?
Popularity?
Be the center piece of a discussion that has no shortage of real victims (some no longer breathing)

Like why the fuck? Fucking moron.
 

Luminish

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
6,508
Denver
I would love so much to never see the words "Grand Jury" in a headline ever again. The grand jury process as a media headline just obscures the fact that it's just the reflection of the prosecutor's opinion 99% of the time. It's a tool that's sometimes useful to gather evidence and prepare your case, but the media's love of the words "grand jury" makes it incredibly easy to use as a tool to mislead the public.

In this case I have no problem with the indictment from what I know. I just have a problem with this headline perpetuating the myth that grand juries matter for anything at all for us as readers. It's incredibly misleading.
 

Powdered Egg

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
17,070
I think this is the first time in my life I let out a "daaaaaaaamn" from Friday in a non-joking manner.

Jussie is probably going to get more time than his hypothetical attackers had the crime been true.
 

blinky

Attempted to circumvent ban with an alt account
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
1,329
Nothing more American than locking someone up over a nonviolent crime.
He was going to let two innocent people go to prison for a non-existent hate crime until he learned that the two guys the cops picked up were his accomplices. Fuck this guy. He deserves to do some prison time.
 
Dec 31, 2017
7,101
Well let's see how long he has to serve before we say whether it's appropriate or not. He does deserve to do some time over this, as he was willing to implicate innocent people.
 

Hassel

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
1,363
He is going to plea which will be interesting as he will have to admit and explain how it happened.
 

Doran

Member
Jun 9, 2018
1,849
Not a chance in hell. Unless he's a complete idiot and refuses to cop to what he did. Now if the feds go after him for the fake anthrax scare, then he'll do some time.

Yeah if he confesses and works with them I was assuming probation / fine etc but if they go after him for the mail threat fraud stuff etc uh oh
 

HeySeuss

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
8,859
Ohio
I would love so much to never see the words "Grand Jury" in a headline ever again. The grand jury process as a media headline just obscures the fact that it's just the reflection of the prosecutor's opinion 99% of the time. It's a tool that's sometimes useful to gather evidence and prepare your case, but the media's love of the words "grand jury" makes it incredibly easy to use as a tool to mislead the public.

In this case I have no problem with the indictment from what I know. I just have a problem with this headline perpetuating the myth that grand juries matter for anything at all for us as readers. It's incredibly misleading.
The prosecutor presents the facts of the case to a jury who decides if there is enough facts to support the elements of the crime, or any other crimes that might be applicable. It's not the opinion of the prosecutor, however the jury is heavily influenced by the prosecutor though. There is typically testimony during the grand jury as well, not just the prosecutor.