Yeah never seen it in person; but any time there is a new gun control bill they show up in Olympia with their guns... because, that sort of behavior is totally not meant to intimidate, and totally doesn't make them seem like they need more control lol.I don't think I've ever seen an open carry person ever. I remember those idiots who thought that showing up with their guns at Green Lake a few years would be a good idea, but that's it.
"Open carry protest"?
If these folks keep doing this, and causing chaos... couldn't this work against their current right to open carry? O_o
Don't see the charges sticking, the state is open carry and walmart allows it also... The timing is awful but sadly he probably did nothing illegal?
As far as the charges holding up, isn't the law that if you cause a mass panic that you should be punished? Dude knew exactly what he was doing pulling this stunt at a Walmart a week after a mass killing. Lock him up.
In Missouri, the law is this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_laws_in_Missouri
Again, nothing in the law about the recency of a previous shooting.
I don't see how this sticks unless he actually made threats to people.
I didn't read the whole thread, so this point might have already been made.
Obviously, I think his point was to cause panic and get on the news. But MO is an open carry state, right? So as long as he wasn't acting threatening, he was within the law to open carry a firearm in a public place. If anything, he might have a case against the off-duty firefighter for wrongful detainment?
The scary thing is, MO is also a "stand your ground" state. So if the open carry guy thought that the firefighter represented life-threatening harm (which, by drawing a gun and threatening to shoot, could probably be argued), would the open carry guy be justified in using deadly force to protect himself? What if a "good guy with a gun" had decided to take out the "shooter," and opened fire in a crowded Walmart?
This shit is nuts.
574.115. Making a terrorist threat, first degree — penalty. — 1. A person commits the offense of making a terrorist threat in the first degree if such person, with the purpose of frightening ten or more people or causing the evacuation, quarantine or closure of any portion of a building, inhabitable structure, place of assembly or facility of transportation, knowingly:
(1) Communicates an express or implied threat to cause an incident or condition involving danger to life; or
(2) Communicates a false report of an incident or condition involving danger to life; or
(3) Causes a false belief or fear that an incident has occurred or that a condition exists involving danger to life.
2. The offense of making a terrorist threat in the first degree is a class D felony.
3. No offense is committed under this section by a person acting in good faith with the purpose to prevent harm.
Being an open carry state makes that incompatible. The open carry statue directly addresses threats too and I'm not sure how it can't be relevant. If he didn't satisfy that threat, then I'm not sure how he can satisfy this one (unless he was making threats or pointing the gun at people). There are thousands of Walmarts and ultimately the Walmart the mass shooting happened in was nowhere near Missouri. Additionally, shootings happen every single day, pretty much everywhere including places of business.They charged him with Making a terrorist threat, first degree, a class D felony.
Here's the relevant law and why the timing and location is important.
Note "(3) Causes a false belief or fear that an incident has occurred or that a condition exists involving danger to life." Being an open carry state doesn't trump the fact that there was a major shooting at a Walmart less than a week ago, he walked into a Walmart loaded with ammo and a gun and a armored vest, and we have no information about what he was saying while in the store.
It really doesn't matter what happens, it'll be spin to be a positive no matter what. In this case it was a good guy with a gun who stopped a dude walking around with a gun that the same people would argue he's in his right to walk around with if he wants to.LOL, yep. They're hurting themselves.
I agree that calling the police on all of them is the way to go now.
They charged him with Making a terrorist threat, first degree, a class D felony.
It really doesn't matter what happens, it'll be spin to be a positive no matter what. In this case it was a good guy with a gun who stopped a dude walking around with a gun that the same people would argue he's in his right to walk around with if he wants to.
Not even people with a holstered pistol? I see that now and again, but it's still quite rare. I don't even want to know how many people do concealed carry though.I don't think I've ever seen an open carry person ever. I remember those idiots who thought that showing up with their guns at Green Lake a few years would be a good idea, but that's it.
Not even people with a holstered pistol? I see that now and again, but it's still quite rare. I don't even want to know how many people do concealed carry though.
"Lately." Lol. Have you ever been there on a Saturday night?Wal-Mart has been a dangerous place lately. I mean not just lately but it's def got me not wanting to go there.
Well look at that: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-49303879Conservative twitter is lighting up about how a good guy with a gun stopped a mass shooting, but if this guy was just taking video maybe the good guy with a gun is actually a bad guy violating someone's (stupid) right to open carry.