op is sick of hot takes and the "ending explained" youtube content mill that simplify/obscure the themes of a film, usually just missing the point
OP is saying they're tired of people online adding twists or random nonsense theories on to a fairly easy to understand ending.
op is sick of hot takes and the "ending explained" youtube content mill that simplify/obscure the themes of a film, usually just missing the point
op is sick of hot takes and the "ending explained" youtube content mill that simplify/obscure the themes of a film, usually just missing the point
Assuming English is not his first language (not saying this to insult). I had to reread the posts multiple times to understand them.
OP is saying they're tired of people online adding twists or random nonsense theories on to a fairly easy to understand ending.
OP is saying they're tired of people online adding twists or random nonsense theories on to a fairly easy to understand ending.
Is the ending supposed to be deeper than her finding a way to relate to him/his nostalgia of simpler times and thus he spares her life? Or is it implied somewhere he poisoned her? I guess that's what I'm finding difficult to understand.
Sorry, OP. Not trying to dunk, I just couldn't figure out which hot take you didn't like.
[/QUONo it's real simple but that does not get clicks. People that need those just point towards the poison beef line. That ignores a lot but a cook that found his passion again wouldn't send her off with poison beef. He respected she cared enough to fight back. No games just she lives.TE]
What no one understands is that this thread was just a dream all along. There are subtle signs that look a lot like continuity errors, but are actually hints which concretely prove this.
I feel this way about Inception and how no one would shut up about whether the ending was a dream or not. Even Nolan said it doesn't really matter.Ok, I get it. Thanks, all.
I agree, OP. I mean, sometimes movies that leave the ending open for interpretation are freaking awesome and create lots of great conversation but I felt like this one was pretty cut and dry. It's definitely a stretch to go further.
"The way the end of that film worked, Leonardo DiCaprio's character, Cobb – he was off with his kids, he was in his own subjective reality," said Nolan. "He didn't really care any more, and that makes a statement: perhaps, all levels of reality are valid."
I feel this way about Inception and how no one would shut up about whether the ending was a dream or not.
thread title warned ya "ye who enter beware of spoileys"
Those youtubers probably don't even believe that shit. Posting bad/wrong takes gets more engagement.
Also this thread is a bit spoilery.
see you woulda got eaten by skeletons for sure if this was a pirate movie
see you woulda got eaten by skeletons for sure if this was a pirate movie
😄
Hey I got pinged twice from it, proving my point that posting dumb bullshit will get more engagement. (I wish it was intentional)
I honestly don't understand how people can sit there and watch videos trying to explain a movie they've already watched. Like what is the point aside from trying to adopt someone else's understanding of it.
The title emphasized the hot takes I dislike why does no one look at the title and assume I'm spitting a hot take Christ.