I'm saying caring about them is
Please stop having kids, there is already plenty of people on this world. Consider adoption if you want a girl.
Most of developed world have huge problem with low fertility rates (You have soon more elderly than kids in many countries) so I don't get these posts.
But that isn't what he is saying, since a child from a country outside the develope world is as good to address your post.
Of course, there is a biological drive to create your own offspring.
Oh. Yeah. I have nothing against adoption as it's great option too. Maybe I should have picked different post. I just kinda cringe when I read ''world is overpopulated'' stuff so often nowadays. Even developing countries have constantly decreasing fertility rates. In 100 years we wonder how we could get people to get kids in every part of the world as the human population starts to fall off the cliff (assuming there is no miracle medicine to make people live far longer)
Too busy trying for that boy.Has the OP even said anything else in this thread? This seems like a ridiculous question to ask randos on the internet.
You seriously have too positive of an outlook for the future. The reality is people are pushing back against your gorgeous green future. Will we get there? Sure but I sincerely doubt well get there in my lifetime? That is doubtful, people overall want a greener earth but are also overall not willing to make the nesesary sacrifices to achieve it in a 10 to 20 year timeline.We will probably have to cut down on flying in general across the world in the future yes, veganism/vegetarianism is also on the table. AC will be necessary if people continue to live in places like Phoenix or Dallas. Construction is not that much of a problem either. It's not like we're deforesting to use the wood for houses. We're deforesting to open farmland for business. Tell them to knock it off and deforestation will decrease.
Yes, that's why I'm saying "population control" is not the way, because for it to be effective, it would have to be enacted where population is growing and it's not growing in developed economies. The US has 330 million people, getting the birth rate down would barely move the needle globally. Pretty much every developed nation without a steady influx of immigration is sitting on a demographics time bomb because of "not enough babies". This time bomb will do all sorts of weird things to the economy. That doesn't mean I want people in developed nations to start having kids en masse to prop up the economy (which is what the Japanese government is attempting to do), but it is generally not a significant problem. People like OP are the exception to "rich countries have less kids".
Population growth restriction talk is very dangerous because people will eventually try to determine it's someone else who shouldn't have babies (some fascist movements already make this argument). There are already reliable "checks" for population growth. Education, economic development, and birth control.
Your situation sounds like my wife and I, but reversed. Turning 37 on Monday, wife is 33, we have 3 kids now and I'm good but she wants to have another. I can see why from her point of view, as she sees herself getting older and a woman's window for having children closes much quicker than a man's. I think I've talked her out of a child if she can have a dog, lol :)I love kids, but I think we're done at 3. I'm turning 37 in December and she's 32.
The biggest factor for us is affording another child. Also, my wife is a school teacher, and she's not into having to deal with more kids.
I'm a bit opposite in that stance, I'd have 10 kids if I could afford it. They don't overwhelm me like I see it do to others. Love spending time with them and watching/helping them grow into little people. I'd rather pile on the couch with all my kids and watch a movie or kick a ball around outside than go out and do anything else.
Takes OP a while to filter out his /pol/ rhetoric when he posts here as opposed to other places.Has the OP even said anything else in this thread? This seems like a ridiculous question to ask randos on the internet.
You seriously have too positive of an outlook for the future. The reality is people are pushing back against your gorgeous green future. Will we get there? Sure but I sincerely doubt well get there in my lifetime? That is doubtful, people overall want a greener earth but are also overall not willing to make the nesesary sacrifices to achieve it in a 10 to 20 year timeline.
also, "Population control"? No one here wants to force the OP into anything the choice is his and his wife's but having a kid is not a choice that should be made lightly. There are many repercussions to it and it affects all of us. OP should definitely be aware of that.
Everyone who cares if we leave a decent planet for the next generation...
In the current world, all of my efforts to reduce my carbon footprint will amount to roughly one 20th of the carbon footprint that another human being will generate in their lifetime.oh come on. his having a baby does not affect you. maybe if Everyone alive got pregnant now than yes wed be fucked.
maybe his 5th kid cures cancer and people are telling him notnto have them
lol
I don't actually get this post; is Pol a subreddit?Takes OP a while to filter out his /pol/ rhetoric when he posts here as opposed to other places.
What kind of bs is this? I grew up with 4 siblings and my parents were the absolute best. There were few days where my parents weren't around constantly. To be honest, I was actually glad when I could escape them for a few hours hanging with friends.I gaurantee you your siblings raised you more than your parents did. Literally impossible they had the time to give you or your siblings any sort of actual individual attention on a regular basis without pushing another kid aside.
I remember my father saying something similar as you about his family of 10 growing, but yet he can only remember 1 time in his entire life that he spent a whole day with his father one on one. Turns out he barely even knew his parents in the end. Parents of large families are relying on everyone around them to do their parenting jobs for them.
In the current world, all of my efforts to reduce my carbon footprint will amount to roughly one 20th of the carbon footprint that another human being will generate in their lifetime.
So in a way it makes my efforts not as valuable. There is a very very very veeery slight chance the kid will cure sure sure. Lets count that as a positive. But a certainty that the kid will impact the environment. That will be a negative
Im just saying OP should measure the positive and negative impacts in his choice.