Agreed.I agree. I don't find that to be a compelling reason to vote for Biden, however.
Agreed.I agree. I don't find that to be a compelling reason to vote for Biden, however.
I never said or implied you advocated voting republican? That's an actual strawman. And no, lol, it is insanely, unbelievably disingenuous to "both sides" voter disenfranchisment when one party is party is putting up hurdles like Voter ID laws, ending vote by mail and early voting, etc, etc. You realize that a populist candidate is realistically never going to win with those hurdles in place, right?Strawman argument, I've never advocated for voting republican and never would. I would argue, however, that both parties are responsible for disenfranchising the people in nearly equal measure, by representing corporate interests over the interests of human beings.
Joe Biden is a classic white moderate. Let's see what Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. had to say about people like him:
"First, I must confess that over the past few years I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action"; who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by a mythical concept of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait for a "more convenient season." Shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection.
I had hoped that the white moderate would understand that law and order exist for the purpose of establishing justice and that when they fail in this purpose they become the dangerously structured dams that block the flow of social progress. I had hoped that the white moderate would understand that the present tension in the South is a necessary phase of the transition from an obnoxious negative peace, in which the Negro passively accepted his unjust plight, to a substantive and positive peace, in which all men will respect the dignity and worth of human personality. Actually, we who engage in nonviolent direct action are not the creators of tension. We merely bring to the surface the hidden tension that is already alive. We bring it out in the open, where it can be seen and dealt with. Like a boil that can never be cured so long as it is covered up but must be opened with all its ugliness to the natural medicines of air and light, injustice must be exposed, with all the tension its exposure creates, to the light of human conscience and the air of national opinion before it can be cured."
I can't in good conscious support a candidate with a history of that kind of racism.
One party actively shuts down polling locations in areas where minorities/Democratic voters live, purges voter rolls in elections they're up for election in, and are actively fighting expansion to absentee ballot applications in the middle of a fucking pandemic. The party that constantly chants "voter fraud" is the party that's overwhelmingly guilty of said action.I would argue, however, that both parties are responsible for disenfranchising the people in nearly equal measure
There are more than two candidates. There is a green party, and you can also write in any candidate of your choice.
"Joe Biden to rich donors: "Nothing would fundamentally change" if he's elected"Either you support the status quo or you choose to support change.
I would argue, however, that both parties are responsible for disenfranchising the people in nearly equal measure, by representing corporate interests over the interests of human beings.
There are more than two candidates. There is a green party, and you can also write in any candidate of your choice.
There are more than two candidates. There is a green party, and you can also write in any candidate of your choice.
"Joe Biden to rich donors: "Nothing would fundamentally change" if he's elected"
Biden to rich donors: "Nothing will fundamentally change"
Along with praise for the "civility" of racists, Biden assures donors "no one's standard of living will change"www.salon.com
Agreed. I choose not to legitimize it by voting. The lower the voter turnout, the better imho. Eventually we'll reach a point where people will point to that and say, "wtf, only 10% of the population votes for president? And oh shit, it's the richest 10%? We need to do something about this!"
Wow.Agreed. I choose not to legitimize it by voting. The lower the voter turnout, the better imho. Eventually we'll reach a point where people will point to that and say, "wtf, only 10% of the population votes for president? And oh shit, it's the richest 10%? We need to do something about this!"
I wish we could all live in metropolitan cities within solid blue states, alas. Congrats on the privilege though.Agreed. I choose not to legitimize it by voting. The lower the voter turnout, the better imho. Eventually we'll reach a point where people will point to that and say, "wtf, only 10% of the population votes for president? And oh shit, it's the richest 10%? We need to do something about this!"
That's never going to happen. There's not reason to believe voting would ever drop off that much.Agreed. I choose not to legitimize it by voting. The lower the voter turnout, the better imho. Eventually we'll reach a point where people will point to that and say, "wtf, only 10% of the population votes for president? And oh shit, it's the richest 10%? We need to do something about this!"
I like how you ignored my post and cropped out the stuff in lush's post about how you are clearly wrong about voter disenfranchisement.Agreed. I choose not to legitimize it by voting. The lower the voter turnout, the better imho. Eventually we'll reach a point where people will point to that and say, "wtf, only 10% of the population votes for president? And oh shit, it's the richest 10%? We need to do something about this!"
InsanityAgreed. I choose not to legitimize it by voting. The lower the voter turnout, the better imho. Eventually we'll reach a point where people will point to that and say, "wtf, only 10% of the population votes for president? And oh shit, it's the richest 10%? We need to do something about this!"
Eric Garner was literally videotaped being choked to death shouting "I can't breathe" during the Obama years. Minnesota has a Democrat governor and this entire police force festered under it.
Like vote for Biden, whatever, but acting like this shit didn't happen and wouldn't happen under a Democrat is laughable.
There are more than two candidates. There is a green party, and you can also write in any candidate of your choice.
Agreed. I choose not to legitimize it by voting. The lower the voter turnout, the better imho. Eventually we'll reach a point where people will point to that and say, "wtf, only 10% of the population votes for president? And oh shit, it's the richest 10%? We need to do something about this!"
For the record, I don't think Biden has any chance of beating Trump either way. The centrist democrat has never fared well in recent history.I never said or implied you advocated voting republican? That's an actual strawman. And no, lol, it is insanely, unbelievably disingenuous to "both sides" voter disenfranchisment when one party is party is putting up hurdles like Voter ID laws, ending vote by mail and early voting, etc, etc. You realize that a populist candidate is realistically never going to win with those hurdles in place, right?
There are more than two candidates. There is a green party, and you can also write in any candidate of your choice.
No one who actually understands how insanely good Biden's turnout and demographic numbers during the primary were would say that. He is, based on actual votes, an insanely well-positioned candidate.For the record, I don't think Biden has any chance of beating Trump either way. The centrist democrat has never fared well in recent history.
YepNo one who actually understands how insanely good Biden's turnout and demographic numbers during the primary were would say that. He is, based on actual votes, an insanely well-positioned candidate.
I guess that's true if we ignore 2018 and the fact that a centrist Democrat just crushed a populist Democrat in the primaries.For the record, I don't think Biden has any chance of beating Trump either way. The centrist democrat has never fared well in recent history.
Right. I'll just leave this here.No one who actually understands how insanely good Biden's turnout and demographic numbers during the primary were would say that. He is, based on actual votes, an insanely well-positioned candidate.
So what's your plan for Congress?I'm sorry, going to have to stop you right here. Did Joe Biden do a 180 and suddenly decide to support M4A while I wasn't looking? Please cite a source that shows Biden supports healthcare for everyone.
For the record, I don't think Biden has any chance of beating Trump either way. The centrist democrat has never fared well in recent history.
When did I ever say the word "polls?"
As Trump flails doing nothing but crying on Twitter and desperately feeding red meat to his base in the middle of a fucking pandemic that he denies as a hoax. Republicans have full on moved on to the burn it all down stage of their reign with Senate R's already suggesting senior judges step down so they can be backfilled. The writing is on the fucking wall.No one who actually understands how insanely good Biden's turnout and demographic numbers during the primary were would say that. He is, based on actual votes, an insanely well-positioned candidate.
For the record, I don't think Biden has any chance of beating Trump either way. The centrist democrat has never fared well in recent history.
At a point we need to call it for what it is.Love to discount all polling/primary performances to fit my nihilistic world view.
In this reality, we seem to forget that Obama WAS the centrist candidate from the very start.
There are more than two candidates. There is a green party, and you can also write in any candidate of your choice.
At a point we need to call it for what it is.
Anti-intellectualism
Community organization and solidarity. A movement has to be built from the bottom up, what's it going to take for you folks to realize this top-down bullshit doesn't work, and hasn't worked for the past 50 years?So what's your plan for Congress?
In fact what's your plan in general for helping getting M4A passed? It's obviously not with your right to vote, so what else do you do?
A voice of reason has arrived in the thread. We need a labor MOVEMENT, but I'd settle for a legitimate labor party as a consolation prize.sure bidens better... but supporting a third candidate and giving them enough support to be taken seriously would probably be better for the country in the long run t this point
There is a party straight up devoted to that and they're quite active during these trying times at that.At a point we need to call it for what it is.
Anti-intellectualism
sure bidens better... but supporting a third candidate and giving them enough support to be taken seriously would probably be better for the country in the long run t this point
sure bidens better... but supporting a third candidate and giving them enough support to be taken seriously would probably be better for the country in the long run t this point
never, so it will have to be created I guessWhen was the last time a third party put up a candidate that could be taken seriously?
Community organization and solidarity. A movement has to be built from the bottom up, what's it going to take for you folks to realize this top-down bullshit doesn't work, and hasn't worked for the past 50 years?
Community organization and solidarity. A movement has to be built from the bottom up, what's it going to take for you folks to realize this top-down bullshit doesn't work, and hasn't worked for the past 50 years?
A voice of reason has arrived in the thread. We need a labor MOVEMENT, but I'd settle for a legitimate labor party as a consolation prize.
When was the last time a third party put up a candidate that could be taken seriously?
This really is the biggest unquestionable issue why Trump needs to be removed that really doesn't get the attention it deserves.Whatever you think about Biden there is certainty that he will have exponentially better people around him than Trump. It won't even be 1/100 as bad. Trump has curated his inner circle to the weakest of yes men that are pretty much complete losers that no one would ever hire but they stroke his ego so they got a job. Bidens administration will be better in every single way.
It's incredibly naive to think the democrats wouldn't just as quickly crush any growing proper leftist movement, too.But, again, the answer isn't letting Trump and his cronies win another term BECAUSE THEY WILL DO EVERYTHING THEY CAN TO CRUSH YOUR MOVEMENT.
Ross Perot, who still didn't win a single state. He did manage to steal votes mostly from Bush, I think...
That was the first name to come to mind, but in these years since most of these...spirited posters have been old enough to care about politics, it's been a tinfoil brigade.
You and I both know voting 3rd party in the US is not a viable option.There are more than two candidates. There is a green party, and you can also write in any candidate of your choice.
"Joe Biden to rich donors: "Nothing would fundamentally change" if he's elected"
Biden to rich donors: "Nothing will fundamentally change"
Along with praise for the "civility" of racists, Biden assures donors "no one's standard of living will change"www.salon.com