???I mean, 99% of the people here play japanese games, and the japanese society is extremely misogynistic.
???I mean, 99% of the people here play japanese games, and the japanese society is extremely misogynistic.
Yes, I'm okay with not buying or even touching a game made by a bigot and nazi collaborator like Daniel Vavra. The pain and suffering he's caused to so many people really makes me think about what priorities people here on ERA and elsewhere have if they are okay with the game.
And what a coincidence that the game only features white people!
All the posters in here who are defending Vavra, gaslighting what it means to be alt-right, obfuscating the issue on the white-washing of history, and the white supremacist misogynist harassment done by Vavra and his followers, tells me that you don't care about all the victims of bigoted gamer culture and that you do not care about the well-being of those who are maginalized and oppressed and harassed by literal nazis.
Or maybe you not only don't care, but you actually prefer the state of things where white men are pleased all the time, while all others are dominated and marginalized. Regardless of your intentions, this is what you do with all the alt-right apologia and gaslighting.
Yeah, it's clear to me that people don't give a shit about the wellbeing of others. Everyone who say that they are against harassing women in games or that they are staunchly anti-Gamergate the last 3 years, yet are entirely fine with supporting a key bigot who used his platform to harass and target women in the games industry, tells me that they never really cared and that talk is cheap.
Your kind of guy uses his platform to terrorize women and he is making a game that gets the official Stormfront seal of approval.
I don't agree with the idea of projecting wider problems with society onto all developers that happen to come from that country. To me that is almost as crazy as not wanting to buy American games because the population voted for Trump (are there really people who do this? I've seen the idea brought up a few times.)
Except they are historically accurate. You're just angry because the historical reality doesn't suit your progressive ideals.I think people should not only be alarmed by Vavra and his misogynist actions and far-right ideology, but also with the game itself since it adamantly creates an all-White historical space that feeds into contemporary white nationalist fantasies about the past (which also aren't historically accurate).
"I'm <member of oppressed group>, and I'm ok with <oppression>" is not really a defensible position. See House Negro (particularly Malcom X's usage of the term).I'm a POC and I have absolutely no issue with Danviel Vavra. All I see from those Twitter caps are privileged Americans trying to push their ideologies on people from other countries.
Misogyny on one society's part does not justify any other kind of prejudice or discrimination. Also, is Japanese society really that much more misogynistic? What percentage of CEOs or politicians are women I hour country?I mean, 99% of the people here play japanese games, and the japanese society is extremely misogynistic.
No. Because you're essentially funding their voice. You're giving them more power, even if it's just $20 it adds up. This world doesn't need more Notch's or people like him in it. You can't backround check everyone,nobody is perfect. But I don't go around sexually harassing people, using slurs, being a gamergater or general suppression of any kind. I don't know how people can OPENLY support OPENLY shitty people. That's my general stance.
People like the guy attached to this game or even the Last Night are going to make cash, just not mine. I can live without playing their game, I can live without seeing the next Kevin Spacey flick-- I don't feel comfortable supporting shitty people
The problem is that americans are the privileged ones here, trying to use their position to enforce their own views on team from much poorer country made up of group that's been opressed through history and is now marginalized in western society. This is essentially attempt at cultural colonialism. Just because some of americans attempting it aren't white as snow doesn't change anything."I'm <member of oppressed group>, and I'm ok with <oppression>" is not really a defensible position. See House Negro (particularly Malcom X's usage of the term).
?
They are not historically accurate though? Maybe you should read up on recent scholarly work before you talk about things you are clearly not very knowledgeable about. See this post by the same person you quoted:Except they are historically accurate. You're just angry because the historical reality doesn't suit your progressive ideals.
White nationalists and supremacists love the Middle Ages, because they think it was all-White. This context is the same that Vavra and his team are contributing to by intentionally white-washing Bohemian history, as if it was always all-White. People unaffected by white supremacy don't see this and have been fed so much all-White renditions of history that they think that it's just "historically accurate" and entirely coincidental that an alt-righter is making an all-White game.
People should look up how White nationalists love the Middle Ages and why it's such a danger to construct narratives about the past that fulfills white supremacist fantasies:
And:
And Helen Young, a professor in Medieval Studies, similarly state that this invention of an all-White history is a product of 18th history writing:
https://www.publicmedievalist.com/race-racism-middle-ages-tearing-whites-medieval-world/
People should read up more on the relation between white supremacy and medieval history writing:
https://www.publicmedievalist.com/dark-enlightenment/
https://www.publicmedievalist.com/vile-love-affair/
https://surreymedieval.wordpress.co...-studies-a-reading-list-pulled-from-my-phone/
https://psmag.com/education/nazis-love-taylor-swift-and-also-the-crusades
https://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2017/01/medieval-memes
Jeez Lime, you're really pushing the "I'm going to generalize every single person on Resetera if they even diverge 1% away from what I think".
Except they are historically accurate. You're just angry because the historical reality doesn't suit your progressive ideals.
White nationalists and supremacists love the Middle Ages, because they think it was all-White. This context is the same that Vavra and his team are contributing to by intentionally white-washing Bohemian history, as if it was always all-White. People unaffected by white supremacy don't see this and have been fed so much all-White renditions of history that they think that it's just "historically accurate" and entirely coincidental that an alt-righter is making an all-White game.
People should look up how White nationalists love the Middle Ages and why it's such a danger to construct narratives about the past that fulfills white supremacist fantasies:
And:
And Helen Young, a professor in Medieval Studies, similarly state that this invention of an all-White history is a product of 18th history writing:
https://www.publicmedievalist.com/race-racism-middle-ages-tearing-whites-medieval-world/
People should read up more on the relation between white supremacy and medieval history writing:
https://www.publicmedievalist.com/dark-enlightenment/
https://www.publicmedievalist.com/vile-love-affair/
https://surreymedieval.wordpress.co...-studies-a-reading-list-pulled-from-my-phone/
https://psmag.com/education/nazis-love-taylor-swift-and-also-the-crusades
https://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2017/01/medieval-memes
one thing is someone having a shitty opinion and another is kevin spacey who actually hurt people.
Pushing harmful ideologies hurt people, how is this a foreign concept to you?one thing is someone having a shitty opinion and another is kevin spacey who actually hurt people.
Listen to your own advice and do some research. You don't seen to realize Europe is big continent and was filled with many verious countries of very different situations. All those sources you point to describe diversity in western/souther Europe, where it was pretty common because of trade routes and other historical events. Kingdom Come is set in bohemian countryside, where there wasn;'t any real diversity as americans see it (plenty of diversity in european way of thinking though).They are not historically accurate though? Maybe you should read up on recent scholarly work before you talk about things you are clearly not very knowledgeable about. See this post by the same person you quoted:
All those links and yet none of them proves what you're claiming
Europe is quite literally the second smallest continent....Listen to your own advice and do some research. You don't seen to realize Europe is big continent and was filled with many verious countries of very different situations. All those sources you point to describe diversity in western/souther Europe, where it was pretty common because of trade routes and other historical events. Kingdom Come is set in bohemian countryside, where there wasn;'t any real diversity as americans see it (plenty of diversity in european way of thinking though).
Even today Czechia is white as hell. If you're not living in big city you might spend your entire life not seeing even one black person in real life. Just because there are tons of people of color in London or Paris doesn't change that.
Thanks for that post. I don't think that Warhorse have ever argued that there were no black people at all in 15th century Bohemia. Their research even indicates that there are two documented cases of black persons present at the court of Charles IV. 15th century Prague was a major hub for culture and commerce so it is quite likely that other ethnicities would be present there.
There's also East Central Europe in the Middle Ages, 1000-1500 by Jean W Sedlar, Chapter 13: Ethnicity and Nationalism (p. 401) to read more about the integration of the Turkic-speaking Cumans into the overall identity of the region. Keep in mind, however, that many of these distinctions do not reflect "race" as we think of it or have it now, but denote religious and/or ethnic affiliations. Which is not the same as race. It does however, show just how diverse and well-traveled the general population was at that time, and how much immigration to the area there was: from Italy, Greece, Germany, Turkey, and Central/South Asia.
Bohemia was not completely isolated back then. They had lots of trade with the rest of the Roman Empire. Such trade brought in e.g. Jewish people. During this time, Europe dealt with Mongol and Tatar invasions, which made people move around a lot. This caused migration to Bohemia as well.Listen to your own advice and do some research. You don't seen to realize Europe is big continent and was filled with many verious countries of very different situations. All those sources you point to describe diversity in western/souther Europe, where it was pretty common because of trade routes and other historical events. Kingdom Come is set in bohemian countryside, where there wasn;'t any real diversity as americans see it (plenty of diversity in european way of thinking though).
Of course, but this is countryside, while divertsity was mostly found in big cities. And most of all to americans diveristy is pretty much "lots of black people" and that's what the complains about Kingdom Come are. The devs already said there will be jews, romani people and other ethnicities in the game.Bohemia was not completely isolated back then. They had lots of trade with the rest of the Roman Empire. Such trade brought in e.g. Jewish people. During this time, Europe dealt with Mongol and Tatar invasions, which made people move around a lot. This caused migration to Bohemia as well.
It's still a large land mass though. Especially when you consider how transportation worked in medieval era compared to today. And most of all, it's incredibly diverse plece shaped by long and turbulent history. You can't assume anything that was true for France or UK will be also true for some eastern countries. Americans have very skewed view of culture and ethnicity, to them Europe is pretty much one country and european white people are all one big happy family. The reality is completely different.Europe is quite literally the second smallest continent....
I... kinda make maps for a living.
Well mongol invasion was like 300 years before stopped thousands of km before bohemia and jewish, romani, turks are still ethnically white and from tatars there are cumans which are actually part of invading army.Bohemia was not completely isolated back then. They had lots of trade with the rest of the Roman Empire. Such trade brought in e.g. Jewish people. During this time, Europe dealt with Mongol and Tatar invasions, which made people move around a lot. This caused migration to Bohemia as well.
People like you are what made nonsense like Margaret of Anjou turning from teenage white girl into middleaged black women on BBC possible.
Well mongol invasion was like 300 years before stopped thousands of km before bohemia and jewish, romani, turks are still ethnically white and from tatars there are cumans which are actually part of invading army.
Its like americans see europe as one single entity with single same history and dont see opression between two "white" cultures as an opression.
Its kinda offending me as a czech person to be honest
Mongol invasion stopped before the game took place, which means that the descendants of displaced people would still live in the areas they were displaced to. And the Mongols reached all the way to Poland.Well mongol invasion was like 300 years before stopped thousands of km before bohemia and jewish, romani, turks are still ethnically white and from tatars there are cumans which are actually part of invading army.
Its like americans see europe as one single entity with single same history and dont see opression between two "white" cultures as an opression.
Its kinda offending me as a czech person to be honest
And this.No offense, but I don't often hear Turkish and Romani people described as ethnically white.
Well the word wasnt really an argumnet just an emotional reaction to what i would call cultural collonization. The american progressives or however should i call them seem to fail to inderstand that europe isnt one single entity but very diverse landmass with ton of individual nation, ethnicities and cultures with very bloody history of oppression.I feel the same way, but on the one hand "being offended" in here is not an argument...so my logic told me to stop care about this, but on the other other hand emotions tell me to keep care about this. and I am really conflicted on all of this....
yes if you're talking about size, absolutely no if you're talking about population numbers which is pretty much the most important metric here, definitely even more during the middle agesEurope is quite literally the second smallest continent....
I... kinda make maps for a living.
I would go one step further and say that, geographically, Europe is not a continent at all. You can make an argument for Europe as a continent as a social construct, but in the geographical sense of the word, I don't see it.Europe is quite literally the second smallest continent....
I... kinda make maps for a living.
I know it's a long thread, but I have to ask you what kind of question is that really?Kingdom come deliverance is out in a couple weeks and the game seems like it might alright, problem is that the developers are apparently associate with the alt right. Is it okay for me to buy this game or am I supporting a dev that has harmful ideas that affect women and PoC poorly?
I mean it's a Shakespearen play in a series called Hollow Crown (Henry VI) so it's not actually that historically accurate in the first place so I really don't see what's wrong with a Black actress playing the part in a Shakespearen play. Shakespeare isn't historically accurate, and the first people who would have played Magaret of Anjou would have been men, so I don't think Shakespeare cared much about accurate casting either.You know I have no idea what this was about, so I decided to search it (at work no less so I'll probably be fired for the results).
All the results I get (that are complaining about it) are from british conservative tabloids and a site that is lovingly named whitegenocideproject.com
Any other result talking about it doesn't even seem to bring up the fact that she's black.
So is there actually a controversy to this "nonsense"? Or are people trying to make it that way, and given that this happened a year or two ago, failed? Is there anything inherently wrong with casting a minority to play a role that is already overserved and represented?
Edit: Also the Youtube comments for a clip I saw were just people complaining about political correctness. Sooooooo business as usual, same thing they would complain about whether or not the character was real or imaginary.
I see a different issue. Their self-importateness, like the world revolves around them and their ideas and stuff like that. I am not anti-american at all, but those who you describe as american progressives seems to be educated on everything, everywhere in the world and they are always right no matter what. This is what bothers me. We cannot even have a discussion about this sort of thing, because some people claim to have truth patent™ and you cannot do anything to listen to you. Which I hoped would be left in "the old place", sadly seems like it's not the case.Well the word wasnt really an argumnet just an emotional reaction to what i would call cultural collonization. The american progressives or however should i call them seem to fail to inderstand that europe isnt one single entity but very diverse landmass with ton of individual nation, ethnicities and cultures with very bloody history of oppression.
Nah, I don't feel there was a lot of controversy. It was just incredibly silly thing to do and more of a laughing matter than anything to get angry about. Yeah, idiot nationalist tried to stir shit up, but they always do. Normal people just went "LOL" and moved on.You know I have no idea what this was about, so I decided to search it (at work no less so I'll probably be fired for the results).
All the results I get (that are complaining about it) are from british conservative tabloids and a site that is lovingly named whitegenocideproject.com
Any other result talking about it doesn't even seem to bring up the fact that she's black.
So is there actually a controversy to this "nonsense"? Or are people trying to make it that way, and given that this happened a year or two ago, failed? Is there anything inherently wrong with casting a minority to play a role that is already overserved and represented?
Edit: Also the Youtube comments for a clip I saw were just people complaining about political correctness. Sooooooo business as usual, same thing they would complain about whether or not the character was real or imaginary.
THey're white. At least by american standards. Now, by european it's more complex. Any sensible person will describe them as white, but this doesn't mean it's the correct type of white for some people. In europe hate eachother ethnicities far more than we do general races. Afterall to nazis slavic people weren't really white either. Brexiters decided to leave mostly because of eastern european migration and even among slavs nationalist spew hate towards other groups from exactly the same ethnic family.No offense, but I don't often hear Turkish and Romani people described as ethnically white.
especially more than 500 years ago, Europe has always been extremely fragmented and divided(anyone remembers those two small things known as WWI and WWII not even a century ago?), It's only in VERY recent history that european countries started to be more friendly with each other and started sharing ideas and traditions.I would go one step further and say that, geographically, Europe is not a continent at all. You can make an argument for Europe as a continent as a social construct, but in the geographical sense of the word, I don't see it.
Europe is quite literally the second smallest continent....
I... kinda make maps for a living.
Lime please, it's ok to stop posting. Learn something about where Vavra came from.....or why even bother, sorry just my emotion is talking and I could not make it into some argument, but to just saying that he is a Nazi. Just what fuck. Czech "literal Nazi", really? Have your skipped your history classes? What is your definition of Nazi?
Let me guess, someone who disagrees with utopian philosophy? And I have been lurker in "the old place", I have no basis on this, but let say, you totally went out of the way of argument, "just feelings now, shhh". So I am going to do that now as well.
I am a getting some strong Amir0x vibes from your posts, because they appears to be, at least in my eyes, really extreme.
By the way, what's your take on the David cage situation, which actually harm people in real life? Not on some social something network, which no sane person cares about?
Thanks in advance, for answer.
And yes, I know the guy personally, I stated this in this very thread, so I might be under his Nazi command which may have swayed me towards his anti-everything-human stance on everything.
By the way, I am somewhat getting angry on Dan, just because I know him, that I feel that is right to protect him from stupid internet comments, even though it's okay for me to stop posting too. I am really conflicted in what is right thing to do. But "literal Nazi"....I have to react, I am sorry. I am fully aware that my feelings does not matter at all and if my arguments are bad, then fine. Tell me. But let say I had a grandfather who actually fought Nazis and this sort of rhetoric that "Nazi" is someone who I don't agree with. I like my grandfather a lot, so that's why I might be sensible for such words. I am conflicted if I should even give a fuck, but something inside me do care. So I had to wrote this piece of probably useless piece of text, just to express at very fucking least, that the Nazi's was not that nice, how those "Nazis" in current definition are. They were hardly human and something who (sadly not "is") was my relative, told me a lot of stuff about them and....
....fuck, why do I even care.
That one destroyed me for the longest time.I still love Chris Benoit the wrestler, so I tend to separate art from artist.
Fun fact: there was a lot of cultural cross-pollination between Northern Europe and the Arab countries. The vikings reached the Arab countries in their travels and did significant trade with the Arabsespecially more than 500 years ago, Europe has always been extremely fragmented and divided(anyone remembers those two small things known as WWI and WWII not even a century ago?), It's only in VERY recent history that european countries started to be more friendly with each other and started sharing ideas and traditions.
As a continent Europe has a multitude of different cultures but those cultures especially in the past only really existed within each countries's borders, for example you can say that during the middle ages Europe had a significant Arab presence, and that is technically true, but it was only in the south in places like spain and southern italy, the north had a completely different culture but we still call everything Europe for convenience but when talking about a game that describes a very small reality in the middle ages you need nuance in your analysis of the situation because the continent known as Europe is diverse yes, but also incredibly complex, quite possibly the most complex continent that ever existed.