Was at the Louvre in 1999, and there was already a stark contrast between the crowd of Mona Lisa and the rest of the museum, lol.
Mona Lisa is a masterpiece. Opinions like this be damned. If anything encapsulates Leonardo Da Vincis perfection to art, it's the Mona Lisa. Pathetic opinions such as 'The mona lisa is overrated' are just that. People go see her because they want to see history. They want to see a 500 year old painting, that has seen more than we all have combined.
The Mona Lisa is real art. It is art that permeates and lasts through the ages. Everything else is garbage.
Seasonality is still a factor in mass tourism, but not to the extent it was only 2 years ago. The usual "downtimes" are getting shorter and shorter.I feel like this is only an issue for a couple of months a year. I went in the summer when I was a kid and it was crazy but last time I went in September and there were maybe 20-30 people looking at it. It took us a minute or two to get up to the barrier.
This is a non issue for the majority of the year, maybe during the summer they can just implement a system for allowing only a certain number of people into the room like they do at the catacombs.
Seasonality is still a factor in mass tourism, but not to the extent it was only 2 years ago. The usual "downtimes" are getting shorter and shorter.
I don't mind people taking photos of it for their social media accounts but the ignoring of everything else is weird. It's not some rare event to see the Mona Lisa, why would anyone on social media care that you saw it when 70,000 others did that hour.
They want to see history and make sure other people know they saw history an get 4 facebook likes for doing so*
🤔
That was actually a purposeful shot at the people doing it. It's not like massive influencers are taking selfies there, it's just literally everyone else!
I agree with this.Seems like this could be solved by setting the Mona Lisa in a separate room. Creating a line that people walk through to visit. Maybe scheduling a time to sign up to see it online and only certain numbers of people allowed in the room during that certain time, ten minute intervals. I realize the number of people who want to see it are staggering but something could ease this.
Well yeah, they're not going to write about times when it's a bit less crowded. But the fact remains that the non crowded times are getting shorter and shorter. Museums are having a harder and harder time to actually fulfill their scientific work due to this. Just because it isn't year round, doesn't mean it's not gotten to a point where it does interfere.You're right but this same problem is all over Paris during July and August but by the end of September until May or June it can be completely dead. It just seems like an article based on the absolute worst time of the year when it is like that everywhere in Paris at that time and again it is like a different world outside of those couple of months.
That's what the article is suggesting.Seems like this could be solved by setting the Mona Lisa in a separate room. Creating a line that people walk through to visit. Maybe scheduling a time to sign up to see it online and only certain numbers of people allowed in the room during that certain time, ten minute intervals. I realize the number of people who want to see it are staggering but something could ease this.
She needs her own space. Build a pavilion for her, perhaps in the Tuileries, that is optimized for the crowds. Connect it to the main museum via the underground mall known as the Carrousel du Louvre, and sell a single ticket for both locations. Set up prime selfie stations, and let more curious visitors learn about the mysterious Gioconda with supplementary exhibits. Get it up in time for the 2024 Summer Olympics. Let Kylian Mbappé inaugurate it, maybe with Carla Bruni alongside. Sell macarons.
My dude, there is plenty of art made every single day, across mediums Da Vinci couldn't have imagined, that is worth experiencing. It is a brilliant painting, one I would relish seeing in person one day, but it is only more valuable than another work in the monetary sense.
Is this about Marvel movies?My dude, there is plenty of art made every single day, across mediums Da Vinci couldn't have imagined, that is worth experiencing.
I was there in 2012 and it was already a shit show. People would crowd up towards the barrier, take a shitty photo or selfie and walk away without directly looking at the painting. - much less the wonderful works displayed in the same room. I left disgusted.
Da Vinci didn't invent paint, brushes, or canvas.Oh, sure. But now 'artists' have tools beyond Da Vinci did. Therefore, celebrate what an artist did with such, compared to today, limited technical knowledge on the medium.
Tell me, do you think someone who knows how to create art in various programs that hand hold tutorials for them should be held to a higher regard than an artist who had a stencil, some paints, and a canvas? Why should I care for Johnny Doe who has read 100 books with 100 programs that teach them how to do art, over the genius of Da Vinci?
That was actually a purposeful shot at the people doing it. It's not like massive influencers are taking selfies there, it's just literally everyone else!
The Mona Lisa is real art. It is art that permeates and lasts through the ages. Everything else is garbage.
It's the one Napoleon stole and kept in his bedroom, so basically, yeah
SERIOUSLY.Its a shame that most people focus too much on the Mona Lisa when the Louvre's best painting (IMO) is at the opposite end of the room (at least back when i visited it). Shit was huge and breathtaking.