I mean I expected something to be done when she has been posting Tweets about whistleblowing, and BLOCKING HER OWN COMPANY'S EMPLOYEES (you can't make this shit up) for tweeting at her. We all knew JAB was a scapegoat (albeit not a big loss in the grand scheme of things) but so much more needs to be done.Why would they expect a different answer. If she was removed they would have said so.
I don't see how.
Blizzard feels more and more Hollow every year.
I'm glad some people are being held accountable in this nightmare of a situation they've let fester for god knows how long over there.
Feels like Blizzard will be a support studio for Call of Duty by 2026.
That and the fact that he has made their value skyrocket. The guy would have to be directly involved to get pushed out the door.
All this has shown is Blizzard was never healthy. Gaming can be better with a healthy Blizzard and the steps to get there would hopefully start here. The employees want it and seemingly the new leaders of Blizzard don't seem like they're set to get in the way of it. It's just going to require a lot of work and we won't know if it happens until it does.I genuinely wouldn't be surprised if they didn't make a COD game by the end of the decade. Maybe the Vicarious Visions team leading it given their prior experience on Destiny. Either way, I hope I'm wrong.
Gaming is better with a healthy Blizzard, but Blizzard needs to not be a toxic cesspool as well.
Didn't vicarious visions join blizzard in January of this year?The audacity to name a woman as co-leader with a guy that just got to Blizzard like 2 years ago.
You might wanna reread what you said. You implied he wasn't involved in this, when of course he is. If he can push for Blizzard to change their development strategy he can also push for a change in company culture, but he clearly hasn't. He's implicit at best. That's without going into the sexual harassment case just linked to you.You need a comprehension test if you think I was fighting for him LMAO
I just told them that Bobby is never going to leave no matter how big the Blizzard issue is.
I think you're wrong on this and what we're seeing here is being done to protect the stock price and Bobby Kotick. Firing Brack doesn't address what the employees have asked for so these situations can't happen again, nor the systemic issues that led us to this moment.Brack had been with the company forever and so were the people who had the job before him. So this will be the first time in a very long time that the people who are in charge at blizzard are not historically from blizzard.
This could be exactly what the company needs to get itself back on track.
No, that's Ubisoft, but the culture is the same.
Does any of this matter(aside the Activision Publishing part which does)? Blizzard leadership through the years has failed time and again, JAB included. Blizzard has been rotten since its early years pre-Activision. That leadership has been put in place from more of Activision end/hire over some Blizzard veteran is not some conspiracy for Kotick to take control of a company he's already in control of. If Blizzard is going to change, it needs to actually change. Whether this actually happens remains to be seen, but I feel better about it knowing there is actual new leadership, not someone from the "golden years" of Blizzard.So let me get this straight.
Kotick was again showing he's good at putting the pieces into place to make sure he stays at the top. All the press is (rightfully) on about the Sexual Harassment part of the lawsuit where the Blizzard part is specifically called out. But the Sex Discrimination part of the lawsuit also specifically calls out Activision Publishing. People at the Activision part should also be held accountable. But with the way this is playing out I don't see that happening.
- Brack becomes president at the end of 2018.
- Early 2019 the investigation starts (mentioned in the lawsuit that early 2019 Brack was sent emails by female employees of the toxic situation at the Battle.net team).
- Ybarra joins the Blizzard part of the company as executive VP and General Manager in 2019.
- Afrasiabi is fired in 2020.
- VV is merged into Blizzard beginning of 2021.
- Jen Oneal becomes executive VP of development at the Blizzard part of the company at the same time.
Does any of this matter(aside the Activision Publishing part which does)? Blizzard leadership through the years has failed time and again, JAB included. Blizzard has been rotten since its early years pre-Activision. That leadership has been put in place from more of Activision end/hire over some Blizzard veteran is not some conspiracy for Kotick to take control of a company he's already in control of. If Blizzard is going to change, it needs to actually change. Whether this actually happens remains to be seen, but I feel better about it knowing there is actual new leadership, not someone from the "golden years" of Blizzard.
Yes: Activision is equally as rotten. Don't forget, the suicide was from the Activision side of the business.Does any of this matter(aside the Activision Publishing part which does)? Blizzard leadership through the years has failed time and again, JAB included. Blizzard has been rotten since its early years pre-Activision. That leadership has been put in place from more of Activision end/hire over some Blizzard veteran is not some conspiracy for Kotick to take control of a company he's already in control of. If Blizzard is going to change, it needs to actually change. Whether this actually happens remains to be seen, but I feel better about it knowing there is actual new leadership, not someone from the "golden years" of Blizzard.
Will feel like a hollow move for appeasement if there isn't quick changes elsewhere.
You might wanna reread what you said. You implied he wasn't involved in this, when of course he is. If he can push for Blizzard to change their development strategy he can also push for a change in company culture, but he clearly hasn't. He's implicit at best. That's without going into the sexual harassment case just linked to you.
Company structure. Blizzard has its own CEO/President/Leaders. Activision is the same. Got it's own CEO/President. Bobby is the group CEO, arguably he has little to nothing to do with the day to day workings of Activision or Blizzard, outside of meeting with his direct reports who are the heads of said groups. He can always say he wasn't aware or made aware of these issues and "clean house" by scapegoating the presidents and letting them go.
I really don't know enough about the Activision Publishing part here but Blizzard is clearly the meat of the lawsuit they currently have in front of them, so it shouldn't be surprising that actions at Blizzard are happening as soon as they are. I'd like to think there's more changes to come, but we'll have to see. That lawsuit isn't going anywhere any it's not going to get any better unless Activision Blizzard keep making moves to please the state.Of course this matters. There's blatant Sex Discrimination under both the Activision and Blizzard publishing parts of the company. Yet only the Blizzard part is (rightfully) hit. Where is the accountability on the Activision Publishing side? Why should the Blizzard part be the only thing that needs to change? They are both rotten to the core.
Of course this matters. There's blatant Sex Discrimination under both the Activision and Blizzard publishing parts of the company. Yet only the Blizzard part is (rightfully) hit. Where is the accountability on the Activision Publishing side? Why should the Blizzard part be the only thing that needs to change? They are both rotten to the core.
There's a distinction to be made.
There's Activision Blizzard while Activision Publishing and Blizzard are two separate entities. Of course the parent company; Activision Blizzard is resposible for Blizzard and Activision Publishing, but i don't think Activision Publishing has any lawsuit or sexual allegations? (correct me if i'm wrong)
I'm not arguing against any of that. The sad reality is he'll probably stay in his position because the money the company make.I implied nothing.
With "the best he can do" i meant what Bobby thinks is the "best" course of action to keep going. I'm fully aware of the sexual harassment case and as we have seen it meant jackshit to him; if we didn't leave Activision back in 2007 do you seriously think he is going to step down in the year 2021 when the whole company is much bigger than before?
Also, the shareholders aren't going to vote against him no matter what, that's just capitalism for you. They care more about the $$$ than the sexual harassment, as long as their revenue is up YoY they ain't going to push for an actual change.
This what I am expecting.Watch them now saying "See, we changed things" and go back right to their disgusting behaviour...
Watch them now saying "See, we changed things" and go back right to their disgusting behaviour...
I don't think this is accurate. We shouldn't expect Activision/Blizzard to name every person that they fire.Why would they expect a different answer. If she was removed they would have said so.
Agreed. The HR Dept is 100% complicit, and enabling all this behavior.
When did Kotick not have power over Blizzard.Incredible that Kotick was able to use this incident to consolidate his power over Blizzard, especially when you consider the most horrifying allegation in that complaint wasn't even attributed specifically to Blizzard Entertainment.
Finally a language they'll understand.Activision Blizzard Is Losing Overwatch Sponsors After Lawsuit
T-Mobile appears to have pulled support for the Overwatch and Call of Duty Leagueskotaku.com
"the websites for both the Overwatch League and the Call of Duty Leagues removed reference to T-Mobile at some point in July. On July 21, both sported the T-Mobile logo. By July 31, neither did. The 20th entry period of T-Mobile's Call of Duty sweepstakes has quietly been canceled. What's more, team members for the New York Subliners, a Call of Duty team, appear to have taped over the T-Mobile logo on their jerseys," đź¤