I mean this is the guy who can't even say he supports gay marriage clearly (because he very likely doesn't but knows saying so would pin him down)
No. It didn't. You're conflating people's reaction to Peterson with how Peterson thinks Bill-C16 would work. They're not the same. And one doesn't prove the other.I'm not blaming the bill for anything. I'm saying Petersons justification(however stupid) for opposing the addition actually came true. Which is why he got so popular. There are a million other things you should criticize him on(sexism, blatant theism, Islamophobia, cult of personality), but his opposition to Bill C-16 shouldn't be a cornerstone of "Peterson = alt-right" because it is a weak-ass cornerstone.
This. So much this.Except it didn't.
I didn't come true.... because the Bill never actually was used against her by people with the power to enforce the bill.... And he was already popular before Lindsay Shephard.... hence why she used him in her grammar class.
And I was using his testimony as an example of him taking a stand against my human rights.
He was a footnote, in Alberta. I can count on one hand the number of people that knew him before Shepherd. I work in a University, after Shepherd we had a bloody training course.And he was already popular before Lindsay Shephard.... hence why she used him in her grammar class.
No, I'm conflating too diametrically opposed professors having the same misunderstanding on a bill.No. It didn't. You're conflating people's reaction to Peterson with how Peterson thinks Bill-C16 would work. They're not the same. And one doesn't prove the other.
This. So much this.
He was a footnote, in Alberta. I can count on one hand the number of people that knew him before Shepherd. I work in a University, after Shepherd we had a bloody training course.
He was a footnote, in Alberta. I can count on one hand the number of people that knew him before Shepherd. I work in a University, after Shepherd we had a bloody training course.
I've been vaguely aware of him. General population and students didn't. Toronto isn't the center of the universe, startling I know.You work in a university and you hadn't heard of this guy when he put out his list of professors who were cultural marxists? It was huge news in academia.
I've been vaguely aware of him. General population and students didn't. Toronto isn't the center of the universe, startling I know.
Was it ever publicly released? I thought he recanted; probably after being threatened with lawsuits.I'm not talking about Toronto, I've never even been there. The list was broader than that. We had university wide emails about it sent by the administration in my university in a different country.
People were genuinely concerned about safety. There was at least one article about it in The Chronicle of Higher Education.
Was it ever publicly released? I thought he recanted; probably after being threatened with lawsuits.
I mean this is the guy who can't even say he supports gay marriage clearly (because he very likely doesn't but knows saying so would pin him down)
On Twitter, he has retweeted a post that said it is "statistically impossible for all Native children to have had a negative experience with residential schools."
The Truth and Reconciliation Commission found that more than 150,000 First Nations, Metis, and Inuit children were taken from their families – often by force – to attend government schools. The commission heard testimony from roughly 7,000 survivors, including graphic details of rampant sexual and physical abuse at the schools, and found at least 6,000 Indigenous children died from malnutrition, disease and widespread abuse.
I think Rationality Rules has done a good job dissecting some of Peterson's remarks, especially as he's championed as an intellectual fortress amongst his cultish fans.
PSY230?wow this dude has gone to places, I meet him as a personality teacher. That's it. And his classes were a mess, with his fixation of Disney movies archetypes, at least he recognize that -sometimes-.
The rise of Jordan Peterson is a result of extreme leftists arguing with their emotions which always looks and sounds bad.
The only thing that's missing from a Jordan Peterson debate is "U Mad? U Mad. Y U Mad tho?"
His followers LOVE it. Every second YouTube video relating to him is titled "Jordan Peterson DESTROYS ________"
If it weren't for that, I have no doubt that Jordan Peterson would just be a relatively insignificant self-help dude.
I wasn't aware that those lefties were giving him tens of thousands of dollars a month on Patreon to own the cons or whatever but sure, let's go with the asinine explanation that it's somehow the fault of anyone remotely to the left of the guy whose thoughts on Disney films are on par with Mike Pence.The rise of Jordan Peterson is a result of extreme leftists arguing with their emotions which always looks and sounds bad.
The only thing that's missing from a Jordan Peterson debate is "U Mad? U Mad. Y U Mad tho?"
His followers LOVE it. Every second YouTube video relating to him is titled "Jordan Peterson DESTROYS ________"
If it weren't for that, I have no doubt that Jordan Peterson would just be a relatively insignificant self-help dude.
i find it interesting this thread as been allowed to continue unlike situations where his excerpts have been posted in a not so negative light.
i haven't really read up too much on him but this disingenuous behaviour certainly pushes me to take him more seriously than i would've.
Jordan Peterson is having a bit of a melty on twitter tonight, I'd recommend checking it out
i find it interesting this thread as been allowed to continue unlike situations where his excerpts have been posted in a not so negative light.
i haven't really read up too much on him but this disingenuous behaviour certainly pushes me to take him more seriously than i would've.
Eh, I love listening to JP. He is very misconstrued by the media.
If he is helping people better themselves then I say good for him. I still need to read his book. He is motivational for me.
Eh, I love listening to JP. He is very misconstrued by the media.
If he is helping people better themselves then I say good for him. I still need to read his book. He is motivational for me.
Someone wrote a mean thing about his shitty book where he talks about wanting to hit a child and barely restraining himself.
Someone wrote a mean thing about his shitty book where he talks about wanting to hit a child and barely restraining himself.
As an adult, he has chosen The Rational Way™ to deal with this by having a hissy fit. Because psychology.
do what?
Me too, his stuff really resonates with me. I've been pimping out his videos to my friends and family.
i find it interesting this thread as been allowed to continue unlike situations where his excerpts have been posted in a not so negative light.
i haven't really read up too much on him but this disingenuous behaviour certainly pushes me to take him more seriously than i would've.
Me too, his stuff really resonates with me. I've been pimping out his videos to my friends and family.
One of the universities here in Nova Scotia has to deal with their own free speech nutcase now thanks to Peterson, spending time in his psychology class explaining to students that there is no gendered wage gap in Canada, that multiculturalism is a scam, and that any efforts to offer reparations to the native people in Nova Scotia is just them trying to take advantage of white people by making them feel guilty about everything. Example:
Source: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/new...es-campus-free-speech-debate/article38199740/
He hides behind the right to free speech (along with the fact that he's unionized) to seemingly avoid any punishment, while teaching his students with articles he likely pulls from Breitbart. And the other teachers are mostly afraid to publicly say anything, out of fear of their own jobs for the ones who aren't unionized (from my own personal source on the ground).
It's insane.
I honestly do not believe there is a single person who can respect Peterson even a single bit after actually reading into the things he argues against, rather than just listening to his interpretation of them. You sort of see how much of it falls apart the moment you realize he's talking out of his ass. That actually reading the laws he references, and finding the actual sources for statistics, paints a very different picture than the one he's trying to sell people on.
?
Peterson is famous because he made a trans rights bill about how he's gonna go to jail and starve.
I'm gonna let you in on a little secret: Shitting on trans people is a lucrative market.
I wasn't aware that those lefties were giving him tens of thousands of dollars a month on Patreon to own the cons or whatever but sure, let's go with the asinine explanation that it's somehow the fault of anyone remotely to the left of the guy whose thoughts on Disney films are on par with Mike Pence.
For the record the quotes from that article are from a different professor Rick Mehta
So you don't agree that he's been given a platform by leftist media to express his views against emotionally charged interviewers which has in turn created more interest in him?
And sorry, but I did say extreme leftist, not "anyone remotely to the left of the guys whose thoughts on Disney films are on par with Mike Pence.". That type of emotionally charged response is exactly what Peterson and his followers look for because it elevates them.
The impression I have is that the Media is maintaining Peterson's fame. Same as Milo, same as fucken' Ben Shapiro and any other supposedly intellectual right winger. The media supposedly hates these guys but yet they're on their channels, debating against less informed, emotionally invested people which makes these guys come off as intellectual...
Stop giving these people a platform beyond their own YouTube channels and they will settle into their own corner of their internet, along with the racists, Nazis and other hate groups.
So you don't agree that he's been given a platform by leftist media to express his views against emotionally charged interviewers which has in turn created more interest in him?
And sorry, but I did say extreme leftist, not "anyone remotely to the left of the guys whose thoughts on Disney films are on par with Mike Pence.". That type of emotionally charged response is exactly what Peterson and his followers look for because it elevates them.
The impression I have is that the Media is maintaining Peterson's fame. Same as Milo, same as fucken' Ben Shapiro and any other supposedly intellectual right winger. The media supposedly hates these guys but yet they're on their channels, debating against less informed, emotionally invested people which makes these guys come off as intellectual...
Stop giving these people a platform beyond their own YouTube channels and they will settle into their own corner of their internet, along with the racists, Nazis and other hate groups.
No. You should stop reading Rebel articles or wherever you're getting this nonsense from.So you don't agree that he's been given a platform by leftist media to express his views against emotionally charged interviewers which has in turn created more interest in him?
There is no leftist media giving him a platform.
What are you talking about.
I disagree.
It seems to me that we're heading down a path where I'll be painted as attacking the left so I'll leave it at that.