This thread is about queer representation in gaming as a whole, not specifically Last of Us 2. Please engage with the entirety of the article and points presented in it, or don't engage at all.
(Note: Please read this entire post and the linked segments from the article. Drive-by posts from users who have clearly not read the post will be reported per ResetERA rules)
I was considering making a thread about this in regards to The Last of Us Part II, but Kotaku has beaten me to the punch and written a great article on a subject that has long bothered me.
In short: video games, like many other forms of media, frequently invoke a frustrating, outdated, and insidious trope, commonly called "Bury Your Gays," in which queer characters are subjected to disproportionate amounts of violence, bigotry, injury, unhappiness, and death. As Kotaku's Heather Alexandra writes:
When The Last Of Us Part II's new trailer debuted at this year's E3, protagonist Ellie enjoyed a slow dance and kiss with another woman. My queer friends and I confessed to one another that we were assuming the worst. That happy girl will probably die, because while games allow us to be many things—space marines, mages, and tenacious heroes—they rarely allow queer people to be happy.
This article primarily focuses on queer representation in video games, such as Bioware's games, and in particular calls out two of the more well-known games that have condemned their queer characters to unhappiness and death: Life Is Strange and The Last of Us: Left Behind. Life Is Strange infamously forces queer protagonist Max into a plothole-ridden false choice between the life of the girl she loves and the lives of her friends and family, while Left Behind commits a particularly common subtrope of the Bury Your Gays phenomenon, in which two queer characters discover or consummate their feelings right before one of them is murdered.
What is particularly frustrating about The Last of Us Part II is that Naughty Dog has already killed one of Ellie's same-sex love interests, and is almost certainly about to do it again (spare me the "We don't know what happens to her" drivel -- Ellie's path of vengeance and rage in TLOU2 makes it pretty obvious her girlfriend isn't hanging around in the background chillaxing until she comes home).
A couple of months ago, I wrote a short analysis of the origins of this trope and why it is often committed by otherwise well-meaning LGBT allies like Naughty Dog:
No one who has committed the Bury Your Gays trope in recent years did so because they are overtly homophobic or hate queer people. Whether it's Dontnod or Buffy's writers or The 100's writers or The Walking Dead's writers or Arrow's writers or any of the other hundreds of recent works of fiction that have killed queer characters, they are all written by people who consider themselves queer allies and genuinely do not hold any malice towards queer people.
But again, the thing about systemic discrimination is that an individual person's intent doesn't matter. They are part of a larger system and are contributing to discrimination even if they are not consciously aware of what they're doing.
In the Kotaku article, the author notes a common counter-argument to this trope:
"But this is a post-apocalyptic story," someone might say and they are right. People are going to suffer in that setting regardless of gender or sexuality. That's par for the genre, but it speaks volumes that so many people I know fear Naughty Dog might retread Left Behind, opting for a predictable tragedy we've already seen instead of something unique.
I want these queer characters to have happy endings, or at least different ones, but I still love the stories that I have, imperfect though they may be. BioWare's cast of heroes provide examples of bravery and humility that I strive to emulate. Life is Strange's tender romance captures a sense of early sexual awakening. The Last of Us' Ellie is a goddamn survivor. All of that is fantastic, but it comes at a price. That price, often, is the agency and happiness of queer characters.
But why do we have to pay that price, and so often? I'm not suggesting that the queers should always get to dance in a field of gumdrops at the end of every game in which they appears, but considering the real world's continued eagerness to trample the marginalized, one of the most radical things art could do right now would be to show us a world in which we are more than our suffering.
There has been an increasing backlash against this trope in a variety of forms of media by the queer community, most notably with the TV series The 100, whose anticlimactic and cliched murder of a popular lesbian character caused a major boycott of the show and permanently damaged its reputation. While I'm excited for TLOU2, I also can't help but know that Naughty Dog is about to step into the same controversy they could have easily avoided in so many ways by actually sitting down and having conversations with queer people about what kinds of stories they'd like to see. Representation doesn't count if it's always just an "ally" coming up with whatever kind of story they want and knowing their marginalized viewers will show up out of obligation.
No one is saying queer characters should never have to suffer in fiction, but it is an unavoidable fact that they are made to suffer far more frequently than their straight counterparts. The number of mainstream films, TV shows, and video games with canonically queer protagonists who get their happy ending can basically be counted on one hand.
One suggestion on how this trope can be made less common is to expand the types of stories in which queer people appear. Often, queer characters are relegated to post-apocalyptic wastelands, gritty dramas, and violent fictional worlds where characters are more likely to meet a gruesome end. Featuring a wider variety of queer characters in a wider variety of fiction, such as comedies, fantastical sci-fi, and family-friendly fare would go a long way towards fixing the hugely disproportionate number of queer characters who are maimed or killed in fiction.
As a group of people who are already horribly oppressed in the real world, it would be nice if for once we could have a fictional representation where that isn't the case.
Last edited by a moderator: