i expect the OP to at least do a reasonable job of letting use know what he is talking about.
This is such a great adaptation - it's *just* practical enough while still embracing all of the fun details that make the original so cool.
Not outfits, but The Lion King stole entire looks from Osamu Tezuka's Kimba the White Lion.
Anyone who claims that Lion King is based on Hamlet is Hyena food.
Fixed that for you. It released about 30 years ago and has pretty much every plot beat you would later see in the Lion King.
I mean, Wikipedia talks about it and it was a controversy back in the 90s. The Simpsons joked about it.
Those are basically homagesBruce Lee's yellow-and-black tracksuit from Game of Death has been copied many times.
Kill Bill
The Last Dragon
High Risk
Shaolin Soccer
Tekken series
Dead or Alive series
Rage of the Dragons
I genuinely think if Feige want to, he could produce a great dragon ball live action movie, or any other popular anime like Naruto, One Piece etc.
What is it about this thread that's pulling out the trolls?
Yeah, they are, but does that mean they're not valid picks? Perhaps I've misunderstood the purpose of this thread.
Oh, the Simpsons. That's where I go for my hard hitting investigative journalism.
Oh, look, I watched it, and it's just coincidental occurances of animation, (with the sole exeception of the one with scar killing Simba's dad, and the corresponding scene in kimba.)
That doesn't look that similar to me. Plus, one's a storyboard, and thus wasn't in the movie.
Storyboard, again. He's in the movie, why didn't they use a shot of him from the movie (possibly because they don't look that similar?) But I mean, who's ever seen a mandrill before Kimba.
No one's ever put birds in an animated feature before Kimba, I guess?
They don't really look the same. I mean, warthogs are in africa? Are we counting all usages of animals in africa as stolen elements from Kimba? (oh, and now we use a shot from the movie? Okay)
...The only way they could've come up with the idea of showing him walking away from the camera is to have stolen it?
Different color, different design....and the kimba one isn't the one who kills kimba's dad, so...um, are we counting the fact that they both have lions as a stolen element? Allright.
The only way they could've thought to use hyenas in a movie set in africa (where they're indigenous) is to steal it from Kimba. Got it.
Yeah, okay, that's...semi close. I mean, they're kind of different, but eh.
Anyway, I eagerly await you telling me that my mind was made up, and I went into the film looking to find flaws with his arguement, and therefore I didn't give it a fair chance.
Well of course you weren't convinced, you'd have to admit you were wrong.
"Something cannot plagiarise a thing unless it's literally an exact copy of the thing. Also I'm just going to ignore all the other evidence in the video that is far more compelling than some bits I'll cherry pick."Oh, the Simpsons. That's where I go for my hard hitting investigative journalism.
Oh, look, I watched it, and it's just coincidental occurances of animation, (with the sole exeception of the one with scar killing Simba's dad, and the corresponding scene in kimba.)
That doesn't look that similar to me. Plus, one's a storyboard, and thus wasn't in the movie.
Storyboard, again. He's in the movie, why didn't they use a shot of him from the movie (possibly because they don't look that similar?) But I mean, who's ever seen a mandrill before Kimba.
No one's ever put birds in an animated feature before Kimba, I guess?
They don't really look the same. I mean, warthogs are in africa? Are we counting all usages of animals in africa as stolen elements from Kimba? (oh, and now we use a shot from the movie? Okay)
...The only way they could've come up with the idea of showing him walking away from the camera is to have stolen it?
Different color, different design....and the kimba one isn't the one who kills kimba's dad, so...um, are we counting the fact that they both have lions as a stolen element? Allright.
The only way they could've thought to use hyenas in a movie set in africa (where they're indigenous) is to steal it from Kimba. Got it.
Yeah, okay, that's...semi close. I mean, they're kind of different, but eh.
Anyway, I eagerly await you telling me that my mind was made up, and I went into the film looking to find flaws with his arguement, and therefore I didn't give it a fair chance.
Oh, the Simpsons. That's where I go for my hard hitting investigative journalism.
Oh, look, I watched it, and it's just coincidental occurances of animation, (with the sole exeception of the one with scar killing Simba's dad, and the corresponding scene in kimba.)
That doesn't look that similar to me. Plus, one's a storyboard, and thus wasn't in the movie.
Storyboard, again. He's in the movie, why didn't they use a shot of him from the movie (possibly because they don't look that similar?) But I mean, who's ever seen a mandrill before Kimba.
No one's ever put birds in an animated feature before Kimba, I guess?
They don't really look the same. I mean, warthogs are in africa? Are we counting all usages of animals in africa as stolen elements from Kimba? (oh, and now we use a shot from the movie? Okay)
...The only way they could've come up with the idea of showing him walking away from the camera is to have stolen it?
Different color, different design....and the kimba one isn't the one who kills kimba's dad, so...um, are we counting the fact that they both have lions as a stolen element? Allright.
The only way they could've thought to use hyenas in a movie set in africa (where they're indigenous) is to steal it from Kimba. Got it.
Yeah, okay, that's...semi close. I mean, they're kind of different, but eh.
Anyway, I eagerly await you telling me that my mind was made up, and I went into the film looking to find flaws with his arguement, and therefore I didn't give it a fair chance.
I've never seen someone this deep in denial. I get it though, its hard to see something you love for what it really is.Oh, the Simpsons. That's where I go for my hard hitting investigative journalism.
Oh, look, I watched it, and it's just coincidental occurances of animation, (with the sole exeception of the one with scar killing Simba's dad, and the corresponding scene in kimba.)
That doesn't look that similar to me. Plus, one's a storyboard, and thus wasn't in the movie.
Storyboard, again. He's in the movie, why didn't they use a shot of him from the movie (possibly because they don't look that similar?) But I mean, who's ever seen a mandrill before Kimba.
No one's ever put birds in an animated feature before Kimba, I guess?
They don't really look the same. I mean, warthogs are in africa? Are we counting all usages of animals in africa as stolen elements from Kimba? (oh, and now we use a shot from the movie? Okay)
...The only way they could've come up with the idea of showing him walking away from the camera is to have stolen it?
Different color, different design....and the kimba one isn't the one who kills kimba's dad, so...um, are we counting the fact that they both have lions as a stolen element? Allright.
The only way they could've thought to use hyenas in a movie set in africa (where they're indigenous) is to steal it from Kimba. Got it.
Yeah, okay, that's...semi close. I mean, they're kind of different, but eh.
Anyway, I eagerly await you telling me that my mind was made up, and I went into the film looking to find flaws with his arguement, and therefore I didn't give it a fair chance.
Yeah, god forbid Disney changed things enough to make it legal...
