I haven't watched the documentary yet, but I did watch the Oprah-interview earlier today (
you can find it here, in full).
I've picked up that some people find the chronology of Wade Robson's story, and perhaps also his way of presenting things as reasonable cause for doubt. I don't share those sentiments (mostly because I'm not very invested in the case), but even if you do, I find it very hard - verging on impossible - that anyone wouldn't fully believe James Safechuck's account.
Throughout the Oprah interview (which is quite good, overall) all of his answers comes across as very candid, and completely devoid of any kind of formulaic way of framing how he comes across in a way that you would expect when "a victim speaks out".
I should note that this is in no way any kind of shading of Wade Robson, but I found James Safechuck's entire demeanor so strikingly credible on its own, to the point that it really wouldn't matter to me if - in some bizarre twist - Wade Robson's account was found to be 100% lies (which isn't possible due to the nature of the case, anyway, so it's really beside the point).
I got the same vibe from Safechuck as I did from Christine Blasey Ford in the Kavanaugh-hearing. They both came across as completely believable, presenting their accounts in a way that felt earnest without even a hint of exaggeration.
The many times Safechuck doesn't provide an "Oprah-let-the-healing-begin-talk-show-answer", and instead shared feelings of messy ambiguity, was very reminiscent of the way Mrs Ford was upfront about not remembering important details to her case with full clarity.
I also got the sense with Safechuck - as I did with Mrs Ford - that these are basically "everyday-normal-people", who has everything to lose and nothing to gain from doing this, which makes it very easy to completely dismiss the cynical notion that this is an angling for a media career.
Again, I really need to stress that this is not a back-handed way of discrediting anything Wade Robson said. I am simply saying that James Safechuck's account - on its own - is powerful enough, and feels genuine enough that any time spent picking over Wade's account almost feels pointless.