Life is Strange Mafia |OT| - Hella Murder, Shaka Brah
- Thread starter Fanto
- Start date
Day 5 Start
OP
OP
rac has died!
DAY 5 BEGINS
Vote tool:
Majority is 3
Day 5 ends in:
DAY 5 BEGINS
Vote tool:
Majority is 3
Day 5 ends in:
Zeke- Restless Spirit - When nightkilled, can vote next day.
Kits - Snitch - When nightkilled, scum?? gets random PR and name of an individual
Stan - Coroner - can investigate a dead body and find the flavor name of the killer
Swamped- Miller
Ocean - Vanilla
Kits - Snitch - When nightkilled, scum?? gets random PR and name of an individual
Stan - Coroner - can investigate a dead body and find the flavor name of the killer
Swamped- Miller
Ocean - Vanilla
Alright let's get this (end of the world) party started!
***plays Got Well Soon***
So first things first, I want the flavor name of the killer Stan. I would be skeptical of the time taken to use the ability if that wasn't something I've seen you do in a previous game (on the flavor as I believe you said you were Hawt Dawg Man)
Also, can I get some names/flavor with some of those Roles? Specifically from Swamped.
And in terms of likelihood to lunch, I'd go Swamped>zeke>stan=kits.
I'm not to concerned about whether there are 1 or 2 non-town members left since it doesn't make a difference either way today since we need to target correctly
On a side note, it's kinda amusing that I haven't played for like 2 years and I'm playing with 1 person for the first time smh (<3 you all). Pretty sure I haven't played with kits, so hi there!
***plays Got Well Soon***
So first things first, I want the flavor name of the killer Stan. I would be skeptical of the time taken to use the ability if that wasn't something I've seen you do in a previous game (on the flavor as I believe you said you were Hawt Dawg Man)
Also, can I get some names/flavor with some of those Roles? Specifically from Swamped.
And in terms of likelihood to lunch, I'd go Swamped>zeke>stan=kits.
I'm not to concerned about whether there are 1 or 2 non-town members left since it doesn't make a difference either way today since we need to target correctly
On a side note, it's kinda amusing that I haven't played for like 2 years and I'm playing with 1 person for the first time smh (<3 you all). Pretty sure I haven't played with kits, so hi there!
Sigh, oh bother
Alrighty then. Pretty poor reasoning imo, not even gonna at least compare melon's vote/interactions with Sparks?
Why can't there be a vanilla in a role madness game?
I think we've played in a game but I can't remember what!
Because it's an extremely easy out for scum. And I've played as Mafia before, so I know that if one of us is a lynch candidate we wouldn't hesitate to vocally go against them in order to give ourselves cred.
Not as easy an out in a role madness game since someone else could counterclaim such a role and melon did so fairly early when there were more people. If I were to claim vanilla after everyone else claimed, that would be extremely suspicious. Besides a vanilla role in such a game isn't even out of the ordinary in this community.
And melon didn't even vote out Sparks, so no cred there either
Looking back on day 1 votes. Swampedlooks bad with the sparks flip.
This is the vote from day 1, b4 swamped votes kop.
Next day I question fire/mal/ swamped on why they chose their vote. Swamped responded with:
Will look at otger votes later when I get more time.
==== DAY 1 VOTES ====
Day Start
Funky Dude Sparks (3 votes)
malus - #476
rac - #497
nin - #530
nin (3 votes)
Kitsunelaine - #390
Stantastic - #391#478
Fireblend - #435
Funky Dude Sparks - #464
Stantastic - #478#483
Kopite (2 votes)
EzekelRAGE - #373
Verelios - #509
Maolfunction (2 votes)
B-Dubs - #180
Funky Dude Sparks - #344#378
Funky Dude Sparks - #378#464
Stantastic - #489
B-Dubs (2 votes)
Aeleus - #503
melonrabbit - #520
Stantastic (1 votes)
Maolfunction - #96
Fireblend (1 votes)
Swamped - #444
malus (1 votes)
Kopite - #433
melonrabbit (0 votes)
nin - #111#530
rac (0 votes)
Fireblend - #345#435
Post Counts:
nin: 77 Maolfunction: 49 EzekelRAGE: 38 Funky Dude Sparks: 36 Verelios: 34 Stantastic: 34 Fireblend: 29 melonrabbit: 24 Kitsunelaine: 19 rac: 18 B-Dubs: 17 Swamped: 17 malus: 12 Aeleus: 11 Kopite: 10
Current Countdown:
Click here to go to the Vote Tool!
This is the vote from day 1, b4 swamped votes kop.
This ties kop with nin and sparks. Eventually leading to kop's lynch.
Next day I question fire/mal/ swamped on why they chose their vote. Swamped responded with:
Will look at otger votes later when I get more time.
I also don't see how you can say that. None of us have proof of our claims.
Ugh, what was the roleclaim that was a bombstopper? Was it miller? I can't keep these terms straight in my head sometimes.
There is no bombstopper. Dubs misunderstood his role and thought there was a bomb. His power was "stubborn", which meant he couldn't hammer votes.
Miller means you are town but show up as scum to alignment checks.
Ah! I was getting those wires crossed in my head. Thanks for the clarification. I retract my miller suspicion.
Im so confused.
I checked Aeleus, and they were killed by Raylor Christianson.
So Sparks.
So what the hell was with taking credit for the Maol kill?
I checked Aeleus, and they were killed by Raylor Christianson.
So Sparks.
So what the hell was with taking credit for the Maol kill?
Either way im also leaning toward OA or or Swamped today.
Lol what imteractions with sparks? He hadnt meaningfully interacted with anyone all game, its why was so jard fir evdryone to read.
I'm just gonna outright say that your claim is super shady and virtually identical to my vanilla claim and has nudged my suspicion of you upwards a bit.
And what is a "meaningful interaction"? Sounds vague as hell, I read through the game and he's a bit above the average from what I've seen game is not exactly overflowing with such stuff. Interactions and the lack of interactions with people are important and busting on in with a vote while not either re-evaluating or even hearing any new information is not exactly optimal play.
Kits - ??? - snitch
Swamped - Hawt dog man - miller
Melon - Alyssa Anderson - Ordinary
Zeke - Rachel Amber - Restless Spirit
Stan - Dana Ward - Coroner
Swamped - Hawt dog man - miller
Melon - Alyssa Anderson - Ordinary
Zeke - Rachel Amber - Restless Spirit
Stan - Dana Ward - Coroner
A meaningful interaction is exactly what it sounds like, an interaction with another player that any significant meaning can be gleaned from.
Sparks has none of that, with anyone. Even his votes were so scattershot and unreasoned that i honestly cant find any useful info from them.
You say hes "a bit above the average? How.
If your so sure theres meaningful info to be gotten from rereading him then how about presenting some yourself instead of judging others for not doing so, i bet the whole game could benefit from a fresh perspective.
Oh I had just woken up get off my back.
Its also why i called Raylor a Christian son.
Kits - Juliet Watson - snitch
Swamped - Hawt dog man - miller
Melon - Alyssa Anderson - Ordinary
Zeke - Rachel Amber - Restless Spirit
Stan - Dana Ward - Coroner
Swamped - Hawt dog man - miller
Melon - Alyssa Anderson - Ordinary
Zeke - Rachel Amber - Restless Spirit
Stan - Dana Ward - Coroner
And noone has any theories about sparks being responsible for Aeleus' death but not Maols (im assuming given he didnt have any kind of double kill in his role)?
I was really hoping i was just missing something there.
I was really hoping i was just missing something there.
Also how the hell is my claim identical to a vanilla claim?
Another scum did it?
He claimed mao to help with vig claim? Looking at his claim he mentioned his reasoning for killing mao was cuz other ppl wanted it......I think?
In role madness I would expect Scum to have more than one bonus kill tbh, especially for a team of three
True, claiming to have vig shot Aeleus would have been much harder to explain than shooting Maol i guess, not that he did a very good job of that anyway.
Just wierd that they wouldnt have actially had sparks shoot maol and whoever the other shot was shoot Aeleus.
Unless they hadnt planned on claiming it, and that was more a spur of the moment thing?
I literally don't know what your threshold of "meaningful" is though. Give me a meaningful post of your own while I search through Sparks posts.
It's outstandingly unprovable and could literally be made up without worry of a counterclaim because it's so unusual. I could claim a 1-shot backup, undercover supercop and say that rac was town if that's a better claim than vanilla. I swear to god, sometimes a duck is just a duck.
My point is that simply voting me because I'm vanilla is freaking ridiculous and lazy as hell. I'd love something to actually defend if people want to narrow it down to me and Swamped.
Like this interaction we are gaving right now is an example.
Did you read sparks's posts?
What i mean should be really obvious.
Still waiting on you proving anything he has said useful tho.
Firstly theres a giant differance in our claims in that mine actually required me to defend my actions and a the roles viability in this game, not to mention the extra effort i would have to have gone to to make up misunderstanding my own role. While that could be wifom but damn that is a ton of extra work for what really only made the claim look worse.
A long shot from melon only having to say "im vanilla, it happens"
As for unprovability, the same can be said of basically every role left, so no idea why you single mine as the identical one.
Secondly were did i say im only looking at you because of the vanilla claim? That claim is the least of my reasons, i had plenty of beef with melon well before her claim.
Did you read the thread? I assumed you had given you came into the game pretty confidently but im really starting to doubt it.
Kits, actually voting right now seems like a real bad idea.
I think?
Honestly iv lost track of how the gamestate is probably looking right now.
Majority is 3, is there much chance if there still being 2 scum?
I think?
Honestly iv lost track of how the gamestate is probably looking right now.
Majority is 3, is there much chance if there still being 2 scum?
Woulda been the same majority and balance yesterday and scum didn't hammer.
True, but now it would be even easier for them to co-ordinate it.
Like, why tempt it? unless you think a prod vote is really nessesary during endgame.
...they have one less scum.
Its easier to co-ordinate 2 votes than 3.
Why do you think there are two scum left as opposed to one?
i think there is still a chance, like there isnt anything to definitively rule them out right?
its small, but theres the chance that the potential 3 scum yesterday were never in the position to co-ordinate thier votes and so could never hammer.
that would be less of a problem today with only 2 to co-ordinate.
like i know this is very improbable but i would really rather not make it this far only to lose the game over something so unnecessary.
3/15 is a 1 in 5 chance of scum. That's a very healthy balance. 4/15 almost brings that to 1 in 3, which would seem overboard with all of the PRs on display. I think we only have one scum left.
yes, you are most likely correct.
most likely.
its that tiny chance you are not that concerns me.
Are you kidding? Scum had all Day to coordinate. That's two real life days. I had a vote on somebody pretty much throughout the whole thing. All they had to do was check in-- once.