MM was awesome. I'm there for Venom with the digital deluxe edition edition day one.the lesson here should be that if your game is good its okay if its 6 hours long
It is, if you price it accordingly.the lesson here should be that if your game is good its okay if its 6 hours long
shout out to brokenswiftness for being close with thier calculations!
Quick calculation of the average price the game sold for
MLB being over 100 is hilarious
the power of a GAAS game
I think Marvel also made almost $150mil on it? $106.5m licensing, $42m from profit sharing. I said this is another thread as well, but you really gotta wonder how the people over at WB are looking at figures like this.
Hope they consider making a game about a popular character.I think Marvel also made almost $150mil on it? $106.5m licensing, $42m from profit sharing. I said this is another thread as well, but you really gotta wonder how the people over at WB are looking at figures like this.
To be honest, I wasn't very pleased playing as Venom in Spiderman 2, so maybe they took into consideration that not everybody likes the different playstyle. A standalone Venom game does nothing for me at this point, unless gameplay shows something completely different. It's just something completely new and I believe they're acknowledging that fact.Interesting that they expect a hit on first 12 month sales and ROI for Venom.
Maybe those are really reasonable expectations or they take into account that lockdown times are over.
So I guess we have moved past being outraged and are all just posting all this stolen information without any care now hey.
To be honest, I wasn't very pleased playing as Venom in Spiderman 2, so maybe they took into consideration that not everybody likes the different playstyle. A standalone Venom game does nothing for me at this point, unless gameplay shows something completely different.
It's just something completely new and I believe they're acknowledging that fact
The one with Venom.So which document is the more recent one, the one with SM2 DLC or the one with Venom?
So we can assume that the SM2 DLC stuff could be moved straight into Venom, I can't see them doing both.
the lesson here should be that if your game is good its okay if its 6 hours long
And some people still waiting on Sony to put their big exclusives day one on a subscription.
I think Marvel also made almost $150mil on it? $106.5m licensing, $42m from profit sharing. I said this is another thread as well, but you really gotta wonder how the people over at WB are looking at figures like this.
I'm not sure profit share is to Marvel. Might be to the publisher or platform holder (i.e. SIE/Steam). IGs would differentiate that since it's different departments in the case of SIE.
Regardless, having your own developer means you can also get higher profits. Higher risk higher rewards. WB would look at it and see that they'd make the 150M + the 270M IGs is making + the publisher take Sony is making.
the lesson here should be that if your game is good its okay if its 6 hours long
I said this is another thread as well, but you really gotta wonder how the people over at WB are looking at figures like this.
WB don't give a damnI think Marvel also made almost $150mil on it? $106.5m licensing, $42m from profit sharing. I said this is another thread as well, but you really gotta wonder how the people over at WB are looking at figures like this.