Yeah I agree, but I think it's inevitable that they transition out of the business at some point. Given the pressures on their streaming/cable/movie/TV business (good luck to them keeping ratings up on TNT if they lose the NBA contract, and even if they "win" the NBA contract it'll be at 2+x what they pay now), they're probably headed for another round of mergers and I don't know if the gaming business will survive that.The fact that they had a huge success like legacy makes me think they'll gamble for another one a bit longer.
Knowing Zaslav if Rocksteady is in trouble, which they shouldn't be given their Arkham trilogy, they will at least be sold and not shuttered. It's not as if you'd get the IP with them anyway, but at a minimum maybe you could get a deal on a DC game.
Yep, and it already hurts. So much talent.
With how many IP's they hold with the DC license alone, I'm surprised they haven't done that already. They'll never make a Flash or Green Arrow game in house, why not give it to somebody else?At some point, somebody at Warner is going to say "why don't we just do what Disney did? License out DC, Hogwarts, etc. and take ~20-25% of the revenue from gaming sales with 0 risk to ourselves. Look at Spiderman."
Put all the risk of failure on the outside developers/publishers. Sure you don't keep as much profit, but you keep a giant chunk (perhaps upwards to half), and even if a game fails, you still have a small positive to show for it...
You may not get quite the highs of Legacy (perhaps only 40% of the profit of doing it all in-house), but you don't have ugly misses like this that can tank the whole video game business.
The idea of this GAAS Wizard game where after dozens of hours your character still feels lame and underpowered because you haven't beaten enough daily challenges sounds so depressing.Warner's gonna make a Hogwarts gaas, that's obviously the plan.
I think the other poster notes that they've had a couple of "super highs" that convince them to stick to it every so often: the Batman games have historically done well, and there's Mortal Kombat of course as well as Middle Earth games.With how many IP's they hold with the DC license alone, I'm surprised they haven't done that already. They'll never make a Flash or Green Arrow game in house, why not give it to somebody else?
thats already most harry potter games these days on mobile, from what ive seenThe idea of this GAAS Wizard game where after dozens of hours your character still feels lame and underpowered because you haven't beaten enough daily challenges sounds so depressing.
These people just look at numbers and spreadsheets all day. They have zero idea what their audiences actually want.
I think WB should do both, actually. Stay making games with your best franchises but license out that other IP you aren't using. They have soooo muchI think the other poster notes that they've had a couple of "super highs" that convince them to stick to it every so often: the Batman games have historically done well, and there's Mortal Kombat of course as well as Middle Earth games.
Warner's had some standout years like 2015 and 2023 where the business worked so well that it convinces them to stick to it.
But the lows are just as brutal as the euphoria of the highs in gaming, so I do think they'll go the IP licensing route (i.e. only profits, no losses) at some point, but it probably requires some kind of long drought of success (especially if Hogwarts or Batman really rolls over and stops selling well or MK tanks).
Either that or if there's another round of media mergers, you probably see the whole division sold off to pay off WBD's debt.
Disney never really had great success in gaming, just years of losses compared to Warner, so it was easier for Disney to just wash their hands off it (especially when they have a giant theme parks/cruise division that's extremely capital intensive).
I guess technically they are doing that with MultiVersusI think WB should do both, actually. Stay making games with your best franchises but license out that other IP you aren't using. They have soooo much
Yeah they just have to do more. Get a good Matrix game out there, license out the DC heroes too, maybe Blade Runner
With how many IP's they hold with the DC license alone, I'm surprised they haven't done that already. They'll never make a Flash or Green Arrow game in house, why not give it to somebody else?
Publishers have unfortunately learnt that basically no amount of failed live services will ever outweigh the money gained when one succeeds so they are all going to keep trying. At least my wallet is happier the last couple of years and looks to be even more so in the future
Consumers have been screaming from the rooftops for years that this looked meh.
And your telling me WB executives didn't anticipate this?
Tf they get paid for?
I'm sure they are well aware most won't, but basically convince themselves 1 will and everyone else will fail chasing them. They obviously ignore the Fortnites and whathave you in the room that have already achieved that and aren't dying, leaving them as the ones who are chasing.I wonder if they have considered the possibility that none of them will succeed.
Yikes, doesn't bode well for that studio. Just let them make another Batman game without live service.
I can see Rocksteady getting closed and them just licensing out DC IPs to publishers similar to what Disney is doing with Marvel.
Nobody gonna buy Rocksteady though, you're not getting any IP and acquisitions are never about the people.