IIRC, KH was a bit buggy on XB1 where it prompted you with the PlayStation button prompt, KH3 was a technical limitation based on what was said by ZhugeEX. So it may be a combination of it being a not so stellar game to port but letting a couple of other KH games being odd, like a partial collection if you will.
And they probably believe that it would not sell so well, and when a later more performant NSW comes out then they can do it all, even with partial downloads which is a different thing. And not a partial collection.
I understand that, I've seen some posts that brush the cusp of platform warring, but I have also seen some posts that only state factual information and it gets refuted with a "feelings comment" that does not really add value to the factual data. Like right now for example, PS5 isn't doing to hot software wise in Japan, but the person replying "You don't think it would sell well? come on now lol" and "I don't understand why needing a switch version for JRPG is necessary" within the same comment, and misrepresentation of what the OP said, is something that needs to be addressed as it also brushes the cusp of platform warring. It's totally bad faith, painting the argument with data as something else.
I guess it goes both ways, I can see why some would be put off by the regulars, but some that don't post also need to see the other angle of this, gets tiring.
And the way the threads were dragging the "selling 1 million" meme was so tasteless. I can understand in that thread, but that was dragged through the dirt for more than just that thread. Mainly at the moment where it isn't really necessary, you know? I get the laughs here and there, but it already going overboard imo.
I'm more of the waiting game with Falcom, observing if they at least do PC day and date with PS as that can really also help them, and I worry for them long-term. Decline is evident and I am curious if Kondo will shift, even if not to the switch.
