Hence the kyanrute vote for most of day 1. I'm biased against people who play similarly to me.I play the same way every game, but one of my scum tells is day 1 shit posting.
Hence the kyanrute vote for most of day 1. I'm biased against people who play similarly to me.I play the same way every game, but one of my scum tells is day 1 shit posting.
I play the same way every game, but one of my scum tells is day 1 shit posting.
Hence the kyanrute vote for most of day 1. I'm biased against people who play similarly to me.
I don't think Kyanrute is scum. If he was scum, I think he would have re-adjusted his actions after so many called him out from it. Instead doubling down on it feels more like a town move, town who doesn't really care what others think.
(I hate it when others argue that I didn't leave a impression or outright say I'm being unmemorable, so I apologize for bringing up pretty much the same point against you).
how did you percieve Geno on the first day ?
Am I the only one who finds this read odd? Especially since nin was very visibly defending Geno D1 about the fishing, I'd almost say he reacted lot more light skinned to it than Geno himself did.
They sure seemed to be very buddy-buddy in D1. So that read from nin felt like very intentional distancing himself from Geno.
Who knows, you may be right. But at this early stahe of the game it could be scum dropping an innocent looking post to fish, especially since it's based on speculation that we can't really confirm for now.
I'll agree that the nin and Geno thing is curious. In #220 nin says something to the effect of wanting to prevent what Geno said from being blown out of proportion. It's one thing to have your own opinion on whether or not something is scummy, but that and the other posts he was making at the time give off a "knowing" vibe that I'm not too sure of, if that makes sense.
Sorry but this is just straight up false Bear. I had no interactions with him whatsoever. You can of course try to argue that i am with geno in scum chat and talked with him there but that would just come off as a bigger lie.
Your perception of something does not equal reality.
i thought that was it.
There i was intervening in order for your not to throw shade at someone for potentially nothing, shared my thoughts and in the end instead of geno being the one getting shaded it is me, nice tactic Bear i have to give it to you.
Yeah that was directed to you.Is this directed at me? If so, hmm.. how to put it...? I guess when I say someone is a blind spot for me it means that despite them potentially being memorable for whatever reason, I don't actually have a strong read town or scum on them.
That being said, I definitely did remember your day 1 prodding of me. I like being in the line of fire a little bit, so I was actually surprised how quickly that conversation seemed to pass for the two of us. I'm not certain if I should take that as a town read (as I initially did back then) or not.
You were his main defender on D1 regardless. That's why I use the term buddy-buddy, I thought it was pretty clear you were defending Geno at that time. You seem to disagree, though.
.
It is not since you did throw shade at him for "potential role fishing" dont try to talk your way out of it and i am very well aware that others had problems with him aswell.That bolded part is grossly false. Geno was almost lynched D1, he got plenty of shade from lot of people.
It is not since you did throw shade at him for "potential role fishing" dont try to talk your way out of it and i am very well aware that others had problems with him aswell.
But you literally said "Geno did not get shaded, I did". And now you are saying "you shaded him, and others did too".
Day 1 it was him being shaded.
Day 2 i am being shaded for the actions i did Day 1
I called you out because it was relevant to your new read about Geno. That doesn't mean I'm not shading Geno any longer.
18. [m] Geno UTC+3 Geno is another funny case, reacted pretty light skinned after being called out for role fishing, defended himself pretty okay. But today the talks have all been about yesterday and the way he reacted. Defended himself and grabbed onto ideas of others. He can do better but as of today his taste is not good.
I don't see it as role fishing, more like thinking out loud.
Since I played also with the idea of talking out loud and saying that in this case it would be more damming to know where you are instead of knowing which role you possess.
Those are my two cents
The '
pointing it out something not so damming and making an elephant out of a fly in order to look good in the eyes of the others while just pointing out something that might not be something that bug to begin with'
Could also be seen as something worth mentioning.
My follow up to the two cents I lost in the post before.
Thinking out loud of course
That is indeed true, just wanted to respond to it before it could blow up into something. Early stages of the game and maybe you are correct and he was indeed rope fishing
e_e
That last post is here as an example of you being buddy-buddy with Geno.
I disagree since he never responded to it or got into it, but i can understand your pov, even though its wrong
About the above quotes, it is just more of me saying that you were trying to blow something small out of proportion ( which you did in my eyes )
And you can be buddy-buddy with Geno even if he doesn't respond to your post.
I cant....or are you implying that i am buddy buddy with him in another chat Aka Scum chat.
Okay, i think we both stated out cases,i will leave it for now in order to look at other players since this has taken a lot of time. I thank you though for explaining yourself and putting down your thoughts Bear.
i hope me not continuing this conversation does not come off as a sign of weakness, since i really think that due to this discussion a lot players can keep on coasting.
Grizzly you are talking nonsense again, I never responded to him or mentioned him in any post of mine. It was only Buddy rather than Buddy-Buddy.
No. It's not, you are criticizing me for something I never did. Also I'm not going to bother defending myself on that with saying I was busy irl and all that bullshit, if you think I was only reading and not posting then cool.I think this is another semantics argument.
I do think it's pretty funny you popped up right after I called out out from disappearing. Almost as if you are reading the thread actively, but not posting.
The 3 votes in succession between Kalor, Xbro and Sexy Fish. I already explained a bit of this in post #623, but basically I don't think 3 different townies changed their minds and decided to vote so close to each other in that scenario.
And by that scenario I mean kyan leading with 4 votes and Sexy Fish right behind with 3. Other wagons start to pile up while kyan's starts losing some stream. Still 3 hours away from EoD, Grizzly, strong town read player, posts and reiterates his argument in favor of kyan:
10 minutes later, Kalor, Sexy Fish and Xbro change their votes with scarcely a minute between each post. Considering the decreasing length of each vote, it's probable that no one had the time to read the other post.
I'm sorry I'm out of pocket today. My kids say thank you though!
My top two scum is Xbro and Ketkat. Primarily by post count and lack of town cred by what posts are there.
Could you explain to me your town read of Fandorin? I seem to lean scum on him. What do you think of his voting yesterday and his defense about that today?
I was actually waiting for you to come back so that I could confirm my read on you.I said I had more thoughts but upon catching up everything was already stated, so I won't parrot. But I will say that my reads haven't changed, Fandorin is still scum.
Perhaps. You had the time to type out that post in either case, so this defense doesn't say much to me.You're looking at this three wrong way. My post wasn't a response to anyone else's reads. #311 was where kyan posted a very coherent post, and I was getting a solid read off him. At that point I was waiting for an opportune time to invite. That came I the form of the vote totals. It just happens that in the time I took to unvote, there were two posts that showed up.
how did you percieve Geno on the first day ?
i made some waves because i stepped in while bear was calling him out for role fishing. In my pov i wanted to point out that in my opinion geno was not role fishing and bear just tried to make something out of nothing. Of course we can keep discussing if it was a role fish or not. the matter of the fact is , i shared my thoughts on that matter and i got flak for it ( which is okay )
Do you agree that he was role fishing ? Do you think it was a mistake on my part to even try to invervene ?
Moving on i would also love to hear your thoughts on sophia, Bear and Brazil
I was actually waiting for you to come back so that I could confirm my read on you.
Pretty much your entire D2 has been on me, in a weirdly low effort way which seems odd to me. Therefore, I figure you're a vanilla town, not really worried about being wrong about your suspicions and just going with them.
I've seen scum!Geno before and I don't think he'd keep going for such a low hanging fruit like that. Especially considering the way our discussion yesterday died out after you pestered me about this single play you found so horribly stupid.
The only thing that gives me pause and prevents me from being sure on this read right now is the fact that only DCPat followed your read and expressed suspicions on me. I expected more reactions to that talking point, with some nasty scum bait sprinkled right in trying to set up my mislynch.
The fact that didn't happen, at least so far, suggests that maybe you or DCPat are the perpetrators I was looking out for.
Might I ask what you think it is I'm trying to defend?Perhaps. You had the time to type out that post in either case, so this defense doesn't say much to me
Yourself. By defense I meant the justification on your vote you posted.
Comrade Royal's open modquestion was a one lovely move if a capitalist. Will write that down in the little red book of mine.
And in all above quotes, you were saying that in the context that you were defending Geno at the same time.
And you can be buddy-buddy with Geno even if he doesn't respond to your post.
Xbro (and Kalor) -
The 3 votes in succession between Kalor, Xbro and Sexy Fish. I already explained a bit of this in post #623, but basically I don't think 3 different townies changed their minds and decided to vote so close to each other in that scenario.
And by that scenario I mean kyan leading with 4 votes and Sexy Fish right behind with 3. Other wagons start to pile up while kyan's starts losing some stream. Still 3 hours away from EoD, Grizzly, strong town read player, posts and reiterates his argument in favor of kyan:
10 minutes later, Kalor, Sexy Fish and Xbro change their votes with scarcely a minute between each post. Considering the decreasing length of each vote, it's probable that no one had the time to read the other post.
We know Sexy Fish was town. I'd be very surprised if neither are scum.
I find it strange that Stuart444 isn't here defending themselves ardently. Surely, at this point, you know that you're going to be a prime lynch candidate going into the final hours. Why are they not trying to point out other scum? Why are they not responding to people's votes and trying to defend themselves at all? I find this baffling.
Right now I'm curious about
Xbro
Sophia
nin
I want to hear more from zipped and Apollo as well.
Vote: Stuart444
There's something about their play that strikes me as off. As other people have mentioned, their prod votes were weak but the thing that sticks out to me is their recent vote on nin. Most of their reasons to vote nin are just echoing statements that people have already said and the post comes shortly after people talk about how Stuart hasn't really challenged anyone with their votes. It could just be town trying to adjust to the game but it could be scum adjusting to try to lower suspicion.
I didn't make that post with the intention of figuring out the cards. That just happened as an extension of trying to figure out any weird occurrences on the board last night. Besides, if I could spend 5 minutes and figure out potential cards then I'm sure scum could do the same.
Am currently in class. Don't have much room to read, but I agree with some of what has been said about Geno. Also think Apollo just found one post from Geno and built all of his posts thereafter to be based on that.
For now, the last thing Geno said toward Kyan was interesting to say the least. I'll pay my vote there.
vote: Geno
You're looking at this three wrong way. My post wasn't a response to anyone else's reads. #311 was where kyan posted a very coherent post, and I was getting a solid read off him. At that point I was waiting for an opportune time to invite. That came I the form of the vote totals. It just happens that in the time I took to unvote, there were two posts that showed up.