Sooooo google image searching that to find out the context while at work was a bad idea.....
Spill so I don't need to searchSooooo google image searching that to find out the context while at work was a bad idea.....
Hearing from the dc lawyer inside circle that
Mueller has siphoned off some
Cases to other prosecutors on non Russia interference matters .
Apparently mueller has found no proof of criminal behavior from Trump himself in the Russia investigation but has found most of the campaign staff a willing participant in getting help from
Russia which in itself is not criminal . He has given the other non Russia interference but financial matters to sdny and other prosecutors which some believe is where legal jeopardy exists for Trump
Most of that stuff is already public beside the whole 'nothing to charge in Russia' shit.
Next week...in Time magazines.
Multiple cousin lawyers I know who work in dc inner Circle. 3rd hand source not 1st or maybe not second
And they have access to Mueller's findings.. how?Multiple cousin lawyers I know who work in dc inner Circle. 3rd hand source not 1st or maybe not second
Hearing from the dc lawyer inside circle that
Mueller has siphoned off some
Cases to other prosecutors on non Russia interference matters .
Apparently mueller has found no proof of criminal behavior from Trump himself in the Russia investigation but has found most of the campaign staff a willing participant in getting help from
Russia which in itself is not criminal . He has given the other non Russia interference but financial matters to sdny and other prosecutors which some believe is where legal jeopardy exists for Trump
"Cousin lawyers"Multiple cousin lawyers I know who work in dc inner Circle. 3rd hand source not 1st or maybe not second
That is literally what everyone else is doing
... Roger Stone's trial is in October.
The SC just subpoenaed a member of Cambridge Analytica this week. They have indicated that she is cooperating with the investigation:
There is an ongoing court case with the Internet Research Agency.
There is an ongoing subpoena fight with a mysterious foreign-backed company that has gone as far as the Supreme Court:
They indicated last week that Manafort passing campaign data to alleged Russian intelligence was "at the heart" of the investigation.
All of this is supposed to be wrapped up by next Friday? It will be Barr firing Mueller or cutting his funding if that were the case.
Didn't the House just send over all of those Russia investigation transcripts for the SCO to look into perjury?
I kinda expect this, I'd be happy with junior.Just read an article from The Hill in which James Clapper is reported to say that he is concerned the report will be very anti-climactic.
James Clapper is a major critic of Trump and he is a former member of US intelligence.
This has me worried.
To be clear, the "anti-climax" he refers to is mostly because he anticipates non-answers, not "totally clears the president" answers.Just read an article from The Hill in which James Clapper is reported to say that he is concerned the report will be very anti-climactic.
James Clapper is a major critic of Trump and he is a former member of US intelligence.
This has me worried.
"I think the hope is that the Mueller investigation will clear the air on this issue once and for all. I'm really not sure it will, and the investigation, when completed, could turn out to be quite anti-climactic and not draw a conclusion about that," Clapper said Wednesday on CNN.
The SC just subpoenaed a member of Cambridge Analytica this week. They have indicated that she is cooperating with the investigation:
To be clear, the "anti-climax" he refers to is mostly because he anticipates non-answers, not "totally clears the president" answers.
Hearing from the dc lawyer inside circle that
Mueller has siphoned off some
Cases to other prosecutors on non Russia interference matters .
Apparently mueller has found no proof of criminal behavior from Trump himself in the Russia investigation but has found most of the campaign staff a willing participant in getting help from
Russia which in itself is not criminal . He has given the other non Russia interference but financial matters to sdny and other prosecutors which some believe is where legal jeopardy exists for Trump
She was subpoenaed/interviewed last summer. It just wasn't publicly reported until now.
Wasn't Watergate during his reelection campaign?It's also important to note that Nixon won re-election. That's not to say that Trump will win, it's saying that we need to beat him.
The investigation isn't gonna just stop once he reports on his initial findings, this is likely going to be going on for years, beyond Mueller and beyond Trump. The initial report will probably be stuff that can be easily proven but provide enough evidence to make a watertight case for his impeachment (most likely obstruction of justice and the firing of Comey).
Yes, but the extent of Nixon's involvement in the coverup and related crimes (if not the burglary itself) was not something known to the general public at the time.
same tbhYou're probably getting dogpiled for this, but I could absolutely see this being the case.
Honestly, it's probably the most likely outcome at this point.
Oh please everybody wanted something explosive.if you didn't expect something anticlimactic then I don't know what to tell you.
Trump will be gloating when this specific investigation is over.
OK sure but I guess I'm not necessarily "worried" if the Russia investigation finds anything less than damning information about Trump. That was always best-case scenario. I've always been more sure it paints a somewhat messy but not necessarily criminal picture of Trump and his campaign's dealings.I disagree with your interpretation. If Clapper believes that the report will reveal damning information about the President, I don't think he would have any concern about it being anti-climactic.
Because of the word that he used - anti-climactic - my worry is that the report will not contain any information that would implicate Trump in criminal activity.
Of course, Trump has already obstructed justice, by his own televised admission (firing Comey) but I'm hoping for something more, something in the way of the Trump organization being used for money laundering.
There is another investigation taking place in New York regarding the Trump Organization, though, right?
This is definitely possible. But this is something that's been floated as a possibility for a long time. Are these "insiders" speaking from special knowledge or just repeating that line of speculation?Hearing from the dc lawyer inside circle that
Mueller has siphoned off some
Cases to other prosecutors on non Russia interference matters .
Apparently mueller has found no proof of criminal behavior from Trump himself in the Russia investigation but has found most of the campaign staff a willing participant in getting help from
Russia which in itself is not criminal . He has given the other non Russia interference but financial matters to sdny and other prosecutors which some believe is where legal jeopardy exists for Trump
It's going to be like the Mafia/Capone. They won't tie him to Russia, just his underlings. Eventually they will maybe get him on tax evasion or something.
Basically. They represent findings. The indictments they already have done were for cooperation and flipping purposes.As far as I have always understood it. The Report itself was never intended to present Definitive conclusions. The Report is intended to process and layout all the Information so that the DOJ and responsible people can then proceed.
It's a massive web of shit that has a lot of connections and moving parts, on both the obstruction and Russia side. It's extra annoying when you've been following these events and then see a bunch of people acting like if the report doesn't have 'TRUMP TREASON' that suddenly there is nothing there. This is probably why in the end Trump's ass is probably gonna get got on his business or money laundering shit, but maybe not while he's president. Nonetheless, expect a fuckton of people to be gloating because they can't read more than a sentence headline.
The fact of the matter is a lot of people aren't fit and most of the media isnt capable of handling or understanding the results of an investigation like this, especially if you havent been paying attention every day for last 2 years. You can already tell this by people simply looking at the title of the charges already filed and proclaiming that it has nothing to do with Russia. I have been paying attention and there have been multiple charges involving lying or other that are surrounded by Russian activity and Trump involvement, but you have to actually read the court filings and understand what the alias names stand for.
To further complicate things, there are many under the belief you cant directly indict the current president, which just adds to the noise of 'nothing to see here'. Additionally, a lot of evidence gathered from secret methods by intelligence agencies can't be publicized as it will divulge those methods. So even if there is a recording of some shit going down, unless that event can be proven through other means it might not come to light. This is why a lot of charges being filed involve those events in detail but are labeled due to obstruction or lying. It's an easy way to make sure the people serve time.
It's a massive web of shit that has a lot of connections and moving parts, on both the obstruction and Russia side. It's extra annoying when you've been following these events and then see a bunch of people acting like if the report doesn't have 'TRUMP TREASON' that suddenly there is nothing there. This is probably why in the end Trump's ass is probably gonna get got on his business or money laundering shit, but maybe not while he's president. Nonetheless, expect a fuckton of people to be gloating because they can't read more than a sentence headline.
Hearing from the dc lawyer inside circle that
Mueller has siphoned off some
Cases to other prosecutors on non Russia interference matters .
Apparently mueller has found no proof of criminal behavior from Trump himself in the Russia investigation but has found most of the campaign staff a willing participant in getting help from
Russia which in itself is not criminal . He has given the other non Russia interference but financial matters to sdny and other prosecutors which some believe is where legal jeopardy exists for Trump
My understanding is that Mueller had "unofficial" transcripts of much of these already, but needed the official ones before he could take any action on them. Is that accurate?Didn't the House just send over all of those Russia investigation transcripts for the SCO to look into perjury?
There isn't anything here that I haven't heard people in the "media" talk about constantly on CNN and MSNBC. Not that I disagree with any of it, but your assertion that you somehow know all the answers because you've been paying attention to this, and not the people in the media that literally live and breathe this stuff, is absurd.The fact of the matter is a lot of people aren't fit and most of the media isnt capable of handling or understanding the results of an investigation like this, especially if you havent been paying attention every day for last 2 years. You can already tell this by people simply looking at the title of the charges already filed and proclaiming that it has nothing to do with Russia. I have been paying attention and there have been multiple charges involving lying or other that are surrounded by Russian activity and Trump involvement, but you have to actually read the court filings and understand what the alias names stand for.
To further complicate things, there are many under the belief you cant directly indict the current president, which just adds to the noise of 'nothing to see here'. Additionally, a lot of evidence gathered from secret methods by intelligence agencies can't be publicized as it will divulge those methods. So even if there is a recording of some shit going down, unless that event can be proven through other means it might not come to light. This is why a lot of charges being filed involve those events in detail but are labeled due to obstruction or lying. It's an easy way to make sure the people serve time.
It's a massive web of shit that has a lot of connections and moving parts, on both the obstruction and Russia side. It's extra annoying when you've been following these events and then see a bunch of people acting like if the report doesn't have 'TRUMP TREASON' that suddenly there is nothing there. This is probably why in the end Trump's ass is probably gonna get got on his business or money laundering shit, but maybe not while he's president. Nonetheless, expect a fuckton of people to be gloating because they can't read more than a sentence headline.
Do tell, where do i say i know all the answers? I merely pointed out those that pay attention, are well aware of both Russian and Trump involvement of varying degrees, as opposed to the popular 'nothing here' thoughts i pointed out. Add in some common sense thoughts on investigations and evidence and really nothing about what i said is 'absurd' like you say. Carry on.There isn't anything here that I haven't heard people in the "media" talk about constantly on CNN and MSNBC. Not that I disagree with any of it, but your assertion that you somehow know all the answers because you've been paying attention to this, and not the people in the media that literally live and breathe this stuff, is absurd.