That's the joke.
It'd be great if it was still a thing. Chances of that being reinstated soon are pretty low.
It only applied to entities that held broadcast licenses like Network(not cable) TV and radio stations. Part of the reason it went away is because these news sources became less relevant because of the internet and cable TV.
I got the joke, I just neglected to post sensible chuckle as a reply.Oh sorry, yes, that's actually Iain lol. I thought people would recognize him.
He played a piece of shit vindictive newspaper tycoon in Downtown Abbey. This story reminded me of him.
Maga Haberman is the very defintion of an access "journalist" whose mother worked at Rubenstein Public Relations for 40 years and did work for both Trump and the Kushners. It's all horribly incestuous.For all of his whining he (and his daughter) have a great relationship with Maggie Haberman, and the Times ultimately carried the most water for the 2016 smear-job against Hillary.
I don't hate the NYT as much as some of you, but I heard this guy in an interview with the New Yorker Podcast months and I did not come away with a great impression of him.
At the risk of getting banned again for pointing it out.For all of his whining he (and his daughter) have a great relationship with Maggie Haberman, and the Times ultimately carried the most water for the 2016 smear-job against Hillary.
Definitely looks like a Gotham supervillain.
God, what they actually did with the endorsement was so fucking funny. 😂 Might as well have not endorsed anyone at all rather than making Klobuchar and Warren split it. Didn't even have the guts to endorse a singular candidate.We already know they're a bunch of pissy children, they got mad at Sanders for not groveling for an endorsement.
So... proudly destroying democracy because they don't have more direct access to the president. Got it.https://www.nytco.com/press/a-statement-from-the-new-york-times-on-presidential-news-coverage/
Zero denials from these fucking idiots loool
LMAO I can't believe they posted that.https://www.nytco.com/press/a-statement-from-the-new-york-times-on-presidential-news-coverage/
Zero denials from these fucking idiots loool
https://www.nytco.com/press/a-statement-from-the-new-york-times-on-presidential-news-coverage/
Zero denials from these fucking idiots loool
Written by the fucking pitchbot lmfaohttps://www.nytco.com/press/a-statement-from-the-new-york-times-on-presidential-news-coverage/
Zero denials from these fucking idiots loool
https://www.nytco.com/press/a-statement-from-the-new-york-times-on-presidential-news-coverage/
Zero denials from these fucking idiots loool
This is what gets me.The age question has been so fucking stupid for the start when Trump is ONLY 3 YEARS YOUNGER; and clearly more unhealthy than Biden.
Man that's pathetic.https://www.nytco.com/press/a-statement-from-the-new-york-times-on-presidential-news-coverage/
Zero denials from these fucking idiots loool
Because life under a King Trump will be so good for the NYT....
Because life under a King Trump will be so good for the NYT....
Yeah, they did a puff piece literally on the eve of the invasion of polandMay be recalling incorrectly but weren't NYT ready to carry water for Hitler back in the day? Shit kinda tracks if so, assuming Adolf would give them an interview
Cartoonish
His face looks like someone beat you to it.
…that's an actor not the dude in the article
Ah