Maybe I'm just dumb (highly likely) but I only just found out the Arizona/Utah situation would have Arizona retain the records and history/name of the Coyotes. Basically the Utah team (Yetis?) is being treated as an expansion franchise without an expansion draft, while the Coyotes are just suspended.
Which just furthers what I've been saying about giving the Winnipeg Jets their records back lol.
After reading that Athletic article I like the dealing Gary Bettman ultimately made. No public fight, drawn out legal situation or forcing a sale just a clean break and the owner walks away with a healthy profit (purchased at $300 million, gets a cool billion), while retaining AHL team and rights for 5 years. Which gives Alex Meruelo incentive to get the ball rolling on that arena sooner rather than later. I'm hoping that those right revert back to the NHL after 5 years so proper expansion/reactivation can happen eventually without a protracted legal fight Meruelo.
Looks like some of Utah's arena situation is banking on the 2032 Olympics but a much more acceptable situation compared to Arizona, that and Ryan Smith seems to be well liked in Utah. Also helps that Ryan Smith and company don't need to build everything from scratch although I figure there will be some job cuts due to redundancy and those unwilling to relocate.
Anyway, clean slate for the Yetis(?). Can bank on "first game" and "first season" buzz as a new franchise, while an eventual Coyotes reactivation and benefit from a "return" buzz based on their history. And you could do a lot worse in terms of relocation teams than Arizona who walk in with a ton of draft capital. It helps that the Utah team has so many draft picks coming in they might as well be an expansion franchise, arguably preferable to an expansion franchise.
Of all the ways the Coyotes situation could have played out, clean process overall.