indeed i've replied and blocked him.
Even at my work It still is usually fine, some RL games have had some bad stuttering at times.Same. But my WiFi is fine at home when undocked. I even play WiFi at the Disney resort and unless they put me in a room all the way on the outskirts of the resort, I have no issues. When they do do that, my phone and laptop also go dead.
Y'all buying Super Mario Bros 3. for the 234982749823675892yt time.
Y'all buying Super Mario Bros 3. for the 234982749823675892yt time.
So I take it we will see a Resetera Nintendo Family thread of sub sharing around September?
I think people want an actual good VC, one where you pay once for Mario 3 and you just own it instead of having to buy it every god damn device.
Fair point but it still doesn't stop in from being shit. Lets get real here for a second, Nintendo is the pub by far that could truly have a Netflix of gaming just using their own library over built over the last 30 years. It could be totally separate from online and people would still pay. This stingy NES crap is so backwards I don't even know where to start. Its clear they still don't understand Online or the goldmine they are sitting on. They could get $120 yearly but they would rather make $70 whenever they come out with a mini.I put free in quotes for a reason. It's the perception, like always. And the mass market will accept it regardless, is my point
So I take it we will see a Resetera Nintendo Family thread of sub sharing around September?
The closest I've ever come to buying it was having the GBA port gifted to me as a child.Y'all buying Super Mario Bros 3. for the 234982749823675892yt time.
Sony charged me 10 bucks to play Monster Hunter World for a month and another 10 to learn that it starts under auto renewal.
Forgive me if I'm not upset about a measly $20 a year.
There is logic with starting with a bunch of NES games first, and then piece mealing more games into new systems later. But I can get if the type of person who wants everything immediately would be too impatient for that.This stingy NES crap is so backwards I don't even know where to start. Its clear they still don't understand Online or the goldmine they are sitting on.
I agree, but I think I'd be a hypocrite if I complained now after giving Microsoft and Sony somewhere over $700 through the years.
Nope, just tried to make one, turns out is against the rulesSo I take it we will see a Resetera Nintendo Family thread of sub sharing around September?
Well, at least online gameplay will add a new twist to it so there's that :PY'all buying Super Mario Bros 3. for the 234982749823675892yt time.
I agree, but I think I'd be a hypocrite if I complained now after giving Microsoft and Sony somewhere over $700 through the years.
$20 a month to play classic NES games? I'll take it. Really worried that this only specifies NES though. Hope they have some kind of plan in place for SNES/N64/Gamecube/Handheld stuff too.
What evidence do we have that Nintendo will follow through fully with that. VC on Wii U and Wii left a lot to be desired especially with release frequency.There is logic with starting with a bunch of NES games first, and then piece mealing more games into new systems later. But I can get if the type of person who wants everything immediately would be too impatient for that.
- The previously announced price of $20 yearly is for individual users. Other accounts on your Switch won't be able to use online services.
Do you honestly think a system that has more RAM dedicated to its OS than the 360 had total can't handle party chat?
The majority of that was from the Halo 2 and 3 years. I haven't had Xbox Live or PS+ for awhile now. Usually just sub for a month if there's a game I want to play, which isn't that common.That 700 should probably go to a GPU or two IMO. That's ludicrous to pay for the "services" and temporary rentals offered.
There is logic with starting with a bunch of NES games first, and then piece mealing more games into new systems later. But I can get if the type of person who wants everything immediately would be too impatient for that.
Because the original deal was renting NES and SNES games. If they're just gonna keep it to only NES games, then there would actually be problems brought up with their shareholders on why this was stepped back.What evidence do we have that Nintendo will follow through fully with that. VC on Wii U and Wii left a lot to be desired especially with release frequency.
15 bucks more and they can all do it.I think this might cause more frustration than expected, in my household.
Free a year would still be too much for some people.