They should be advertising it as a coming of age story in Boston
That's the thing though! THEY DON'T.
It's not that people hate musicals; it's that marketing for these movies are going out of their way to avoid calling it a musical. Think of it like those mobile game ads that look fun puzzle game but instead it's a generic match 3 game instead.
Yeah that fucked me up when I found out, no thank you
See, I'm perfectly fine with a musical, if I know it's a musical ahead of time. Going into a regular movie and then having the cast suddenly break into song will rip me right out of the experience. If I know ahead of time, and put myself in the mindset for a musical, then I'm expecting it and it's fine. I enjoyed the recent Wonka movie, for example.It's not that people hate musicals; it's that marketing for these movies are going out of their way to avoid calling it a musical. Think of it like those mobile game ads that look fun puzzle game but instead it's a generic match 3 game instead.
the absolute worst thing you can do to wicked is split it in two parts lol.
i went to see Mean Girls in the theater, another movie where they hid that it was a musical in the advertising and the entire audience audibly groaned once they started singing lol.It's not that people hate musicals; it's that marketing for these movies are going out of their way to avoid calling it a musical. Think of it like those mobile game ads that look fun puzzle game but instead it's a generic match 3 game instead.
Would be hilarious if they try to hide it's a musical when Ariana Grande is the main cast member.
Apparently yes. Although they're clearly trying to hide it.
When was the last musical to come out billed as a musical and make money though? 2018ish? Cats bombed so hard it lost money pre pandemic. In the Heights couldn't do much despite having Lin Manuel behind it, going to max early, and great reviews. With the box office struggling since the pandemic and musicals being kind of risky i get the hesitancy.That's the thing though! THEY DON'T.
We keep seeing musicals have long tails at the cinema. If people didn't like musicals they'd fall off a cliff rather than being sustained by word of mouth for months.
When a movie like Wonka makes more money in its third weekend than its second, that should tell you that your prerelease marketing wasn't reaching the right audience. Or Mary Poppins Returns making more money in its second weekend than its first. Or The Greatest Showman doing the same.When was the last musical to come out billed as a musical and make money though? 2018ish? Cats bombed so hard it lost money pre pandemic. In the Heights couldn't do much despite having Lin Manuel behind it, going to max early, and great reviews. With the box office struggling since the pandemic and musicals being kind of risky i get the hesitancy.
When a movie like Wonka makes more money in its third weekend than its second, that should tell you that your prerelease marketing wasn't reaching the right audience. Or Mary Poppins Returns making more money in its second weekend than its first. Or The Greatest Showman doing the same.
The lesson from Cats should never have been that people don't like musicals. In the Heights had to deal with the simultaneous release on Max. West Side Story had... well... its own problem with Engort and the allegations against him.
Still don't understand why they are doing two parts for this when the second half of the play isn't anywhere near as good as the first half.
Yeah, splitting it into two acts. I think it's maybe easier to justify here, since the second act is presumably going to deal with all the Dorothy Gale stuff. Apparently any time they tried to do it as a single movie Defying Gravity happening half way through broke the thing. That's a song that needs to sit with the audience rather than the film carrying on right after it ends.Wait they are making this two parts? Just make a three hour musical! We've had them for decades!
It's live action.hated this play
is this supposed to be cg? or live action? that poster makes it look like the polar express 2 or something
yikes. thank you for replying.
what? book? musical? or just reacting to the fact that I didn't like it?! i'm sorry! unlike the people making this i wasn't actually trying to hide the fact that there are songs in it!
Call me crazy, but it sounds like they could have used an Intermission and solved the problem right there.Yeah, splitting it into two acts. I think it's maybe easier to justify here, since the second act is presumably going to deal with all the Dorothy Gale stuff. Apparently any time they tried to do it as a single movie Defying Gravity happening half way through broke the thing. That's a song that needs to sit with the audience rather than the film carrying on right after it ends.
The lengths they will go to not bring back the intermission...They intended to make it one film, and then the director said he couldn't figure out any way to not have Defying Gravity be a natural stopping point without it making the rest of the movie awkward. If they're bringing in stuff from the books, they could pretty easily do two films
The lengths they will go to not bring back the intermission...
100%. I don't think every film needs an intermission like some do, but if your problem is that the film is a bit too long and needs a break in the middle... this is literally what intermissions were made for!! It's the perfect place for a deliberate and well-positioned intermission. Not to mention a good intermission at the right time is classy as hell and enhances the experience imo.Call me crazy, but it sounds like they could have used an Intermission and solved the problem right there.