There is a (very bad) PS1 emulator.
There are a number of PS2 games running on an emulator for PS4, often forgotten it seems.
There are a number of PS2 games running on an emulator for PS4, often forgotten it seems.
There is a (very bad) PS1 emulator.
There are a number of PS2 games running on an emulator for PS4, often forgotten it seems.
It's not just about the emulators it's also about paying all the people down the lines. Theres a reason why sony just only does their BC baked in the hardware.Sometimes I wonder why the likes of Sony just doesn't reach out to people making emulators and pay them to create one for them.
Pretty sure they could just license them. That's what they did for the PS Classic.Sometimes I wonder why the likes of Sony just doesn't reach out to people making emulators and pay them to create one for them.
A lot of studios used to put out 3+ games per generation, when the average dev time for a AAA blockbuster was like half of what it is now
From an ROI perspective, I wonder if it was worth it for Microsoft?
It's not even just for replaying older titles. It's great for game preservation in general. Someone like me who never grew up with an Xbox can now check out all of these older titles I heard so much about but never got around to. Regardless of how much was spent, I think everyone being happy about it is worth more than that. Long term, they will more than make up for it.I think this is an interesting question to consider from a business pov. It will definitely be hard to actually measure the long term impact of this but at least in the short term, I would imagine the biggest gain is through improved public image/goodwill. But is that enough to actually make a material difference in financial performance? I don't personally think it is for either MS/Sony.
From a consumer pov, I think what they are doing is great, even if it doesn't matter much to me. I rarely replay any game tbh. But it's great for those that do. I do think we will see more updates from Sony on this front, even if such updates are sporadic.
Same. I sell every single game I beat because I'm not going to back to it. Only way I keep them is if I have the digital version, and that's why I played Mega Man Legends 1 and 2 again. Other than that, nope, never.I really, really do not understand ERA fascination with replaying older titles. They are where they belong - in history.
I know that I will be blasted from all fronts for this, but this is just my opinion.
I have Death Loop, DeS (Elden Ring test make me wanting it more than ever) and I Takes Too.Holy shit! Me too.
I am still hoping for a good digital sale end of November.
I don't think ROI was a goal in that case.From an ROI perspective, I wonder if it was worth it for Microsoft?
I really, really do not understand ERA fascination with replaying older titles. They are where they belong - in history.
I know that I will be blasted from all fronts for this, but this is just my opinion.
Lol.
We got 50 or so PS2->PS4 releases before that stopped a few years ago. I'm guessing not many people bought them since they all went on pretty deep discount almost immediately.
I did my part and bought a lot of them at release, lol.
Yeah, same here. I already beat the game and I am still addicted to it. Put in a good 150 hours already, just doing missions and stuff. Also wanted to note: the art direction in the game is absolutely flawless. Everything has so much care and detail and belongs to the world. Kojima definitely has a style and high standards.Man. I hope we get a Death Stranding 2 that's exclusive to PS5. I want KojiPro to take full advantage of that console's power.
It's not even just for replaying older titles. It's great for game preservation in general. Someone like me who never grew up with an Xbox can now check out all of these older titles I heard so much about but never got around to. Regardless of how much was spent, I think everyone being happy about it is worth more than that. Long term, they will more than make up for it.
Bizarre take. I don't really play many old games myself, but you don't understand why somebody would want to? History is not meant to be forgotten. Old cars, old games, old electronics, etc. I very easily understand why people are fascinated by retro things. It helps us understand how things are the way the are, and sometimes are much better than the way they are now.I really, really do not understand ERA fascination with replaying older titles. They are where they belong - in history.
I know that I will be blasted from all fronts for this, but this is just my opinion.
The Limited Run release was only 7,500 copies, wasn't it? And I wonder if the Gamstat number included the Vita and PS3 releases, too? Just looking at PSNP it seems many more people played it on PS3.Jak & Daxter got a Limited Run physical release and it was sold out near instantly. I remember checking it on Gamstat and it was at around 500k users, not bad for an older title I would say.
There is a (very bad) PS1 emulator.
There are a number of PS2 games running on an emulator for PS4, often forgotten it seems.
It's fine if you have that opinion. But it makes no sense that you couldn't understand why other people don't agree.I really, really do not understand ERA fascination with replaying older titles. They are where they belong - in history.
I know that I will be blasted from all fronts for this, but this is just my opinion.
Not to mention the sheer amount of games released mean we all can often go years and years without playing a bunch of great ones.It's fine if you have that opinion. But it makes no sense that you couldn't understand why other people don't agree.
Games don't become bad just because they turn 5 years old, or any other arbitrary time period.
There are a lot of fantastic games on older hardware. A lot of these games don't really have equals anymore.
I really enjoy turn based RPGs, generally much more than action RPGs. But the former is extremely rare today. Which is frustrating.
I really, really do not understand ERA fascination with replaying older titles. They are where they belong - in history.
I know that I will be blasted from all fronts for this, but this is just my opinion.
I'm halfway your opinion. I think having access to old games is a good thing, if doable,but is not mandatory. It is easier now with digital purchases and relatively PC like hardware.I really, really do not understand ERA fascination with replaying older titles. They are where they belong - in history.
I know that I will be blasted from all fronts for this, but this is just my opinion.
Not to mention the sheer amount of games released mean we all can often go years and years without playing a bunch of great ones.
Not him. But I don't rewatch movies or replay games. Once I'm done, I'm done. I wanna use my time as efficiently as possible, so instead of doing the same old things again, I want to try something new.What are your thoughts on classic movies? Or movies in general? You never rewatch any?
Different hardware? Ps3 is probably the big problem. Seems that xb bc wasn't easy, and 360 was way less complex than ps3.Also, not everyone has access to older hardware or are willing to buy them just to play a few old games.
Being able to download & play old Xbox games on Xbox Series S has been awesome. I've got games like FF13, Oblivion and Morrowind on there alongside titles like RDR2.
I don't see why PlayStation can't have that with something like PS Now at least. At bare minimum, Sony's first party classics like the whole Ratchet & Clank series on old PS consoles should be downloadable on PS Now.
It's amazing what a few graphical techniques can do to a game. Miles Morales looked great on PS4 as well, but the upgrades Insomniac made on PS5 made a world of difference.Some of said before...when the very first trailer for Miles was in that showcase, ppl were losing their minds at how good it looked. Gifs of that trailer were damn near everywhere when describing how good a PS5 game can look.
....until they found out it was cross gen....
Then all kinds of revisionist history started popping up left n right.
Some of us also said seems some devs can absolutely do an amazing job with a cross gen game compared to some others.
I'm pretty pissed at Rockstar/Sony (whoever was responsible) for pulling the Max Payne 2 (PS4) release a few years back.
Seeing it added to Xbox today opens the wound, I won't lie.
I guess problem is psn store , which was not exactly easy to manage, and they had to redesign it for ps4, so maybe transferring purchases from old psn to new psn may be harder than it seems
If they put it behind a paywall it needs to be extremely good to have a big, long lasting community. I definitely think F2P would be the way to go or a hybrid model where a part is F2P and another part is behind a paywall but I'm not confident Sony is willing to go for that.Seeing how popular some f2p games are, I wonder if Sony will go for this model with The last of us Factions. I think if they get it right they could have a massive success on their hands. (I also hope it has a Battle Royale mode, the Tlou 2 gameplay is perfect for it).
Max Payne 2 ran like shit on PS2. Unless they got it to run at locked 30 on PS4 via the classics program, that game ran like a slide show. I know cause I bought it day1 back in the day.I'm pretty pissed at Rockstar/Sony (whoever was responsible) for pulling the Max Payne 2 (PS4) release a few years back.
Seeing it added to Xbox today opens the wound, I won't lie.
Xbox is ending its BC run today due to licensing and legal issues. The writing was on the wall for a while, but good on them for giving it one last push. It would be great to see Sony pick it back up again but they have it way worse than MS is this regard though, with PS1 and PS2.
I mean, many games have followed the f2p model with success - they don't need to reinvent the wheel.If they put it behind a paywall it needs to be extremely good to have a big, long lasting community. I definitely think F2P would be the way to go or a hybrid model where a part is F2P and another part is behind a paywall but I'm not confident Sony is willing to go for that.
I'm just guessing honestly. I find strange that we never got psone bc. Seems easy to implement, i can understand ps3 is very difficult, and even ps2 can be tricky, but psone.... unless there's something else I'm missing, i can only find some reasonable explanation in licensing issues or issues with old psn purchases.Could be wrong, but think purchases are account linked and are a step removed from storefronts. So it's more about what each store can show. Purchases on ps3+vita were linked, same with vita+ps4, and now ps4+ps5.
There is a (very bad) PS1 emulator.
There are a number of PS2 games running on an emulator for PS4, often forgotten it seems.
Pulled is probably the wrong word because it was never on the store. It was ESRB-rated along with Midnight Club 3, GTA: LCS & VCS, but never appeared on the store. These games weren't promised, I just got my hopes up.oh word they pulled it? I was waiting to cop max Payne 1 cause I thought they'll drop 2 soon.
I must have a terrible memory because someone here did tell me a while ago that some of these games were probably rejected due to bugs and performance issues. Max Payne 2 does have frame rate issues when using bullet time. I have the game on Steam though so it's all good.Max Payne 2 ran like shit on PS2. Unless they got it to run at locked 30 on PS4 via the classics program, that game ran like a slide show. I know cause I bought it day1 back in the day.