Haha, the talking dead probably better fits to Splinter's Poopsy time (aka Volcano Island) as a description.
I probably gave you a wrong idea. I'm talking about Metal Gear Solid, which seems to got lost during the transition. It's still visible on the old board, but not where we are now *thinking_emoji* Hecht RetroMG
Anyway, Kalor was a Medium, every night he could receive "information" from a dead player. Of course all the dead townies worked together and were allowed to sent their joint views after dicussion forever :/ But I also was an unlimited scum switcher, so there is that.
The game was great for me, I enjoyed it very much (my first complete game, after a short stint in archer). Don't know what the general perception was though.
I probably gave you a wrong idea. I'm talking about Metal Gear Solid, which seems to got lost during the transition. It's still visible on the old board, but not where we are now *thinking_emoji* Hecht RetroMG
Anyway, Kalor was a Medium, every night he could receive "information" from a dead player. Of course all the dead townies worked together and were allowed to sent their joint views after dicussion forever :/ But I also was an unlimited scum switcher, so there is that.
The game was great for me, I enjoyed it very much (my first complete game, after a short stint in archer). Don't know what the general perception was though.
For anyone who's interested, here's the link for MGS Mafia: http://outergafia.com/board/25/season-3-metal-gear-solid c:
Can love boom on the battlefield?I liked that game design a lot. It came down to the wire at the end. I remember being amazed at the role claims that happened, both real and fake. MGS world is very fertile for crazy roles.
I was reading Volcano Island yesterday and it's now pretty clear to me that *Splinter is one dangerous individual.
As a replacement for the search function? Yes, in theory.Fireblend is it possible to also scrape posts, say provide a single view with all the posts of a player in a single game?
Both Pedro and I have plenty of data, though it's pretty much all quantitative (roles, faction, post counts, average life expectancy, wins/losses, etc.) rather than thoughts and opinions. Mine is a little out of date and I think Sawneeks and Monkey are working on getting something new thrown together.Alright. I guess I'll try to think of something else that doesn't use scraping. Hmm.
Anyway, I wanted to ask, don't you folks have player profiles? Reviews, stats, and general thoughts and opinions on each player and how they play the game?
Anyway, I wanted to ask, don't you folks have player profiles? Reviews, stats, and general thoughts and opinions on each player and how they play the game?
Nice, will look forward to that.Both Pedro and I have plenty of data, though it's pretty much all quantitative (roles, faction, post counts, average life expectancy, wins/losses, etc.) rather than thoughts and opinions. Mine is a little out of date and I think Sawneeks and Monkey are working on getting something new thrown together.
Not really a wiki, something like an informal long post or something, with each player's pros and cons. You know, it would probably even point out where players can improve. We have this on another site and only new players unfamiliar to the people on the list refer to that for meta.We talked briefly about putting together a wiki, but the concern was that it would make people more reliant on the meta, as well as paint certain players in a light that they might not appreciate.
I have notes on certain players from working on Gafia games, but it's all memes. (Taco Valley, Kingkitty as Voldemort running a werewolf inn, Coppanuva as Doppleganger as Revolver Ocelot, stuff like that.)
I was being sarcasticThanks, although I went with Monospace. It's like you're talking slowly
Both Pedro and I have plenty of data, though it's pretty much all quantitative (roles, faction, post counts, average life expectancy, wins/losses, etc.) rather than thoughts and opinions. Mine is a little out of date and I think Sawneeks and Monkey are working on getting something new thrown together.
Nice, will look forward to that.
Not really a wiki, something like an informal long post or something, with each player's pros and cons. You know, it would probably even point out where players can improve. We have this on another site and only new players unfamiliar to the people on the list refer to that for meta.
See I would've known that if you'd used monospace
Pedro is throwing a new sheet together right now! We're still getting all the data on it ( including counting post counts on the previous site by hand ( ._.) ) so it's still a work in progress.
I probably gave you a wrong idea. I'm talking about Metal Gear Solid, which seems to got lost during the transition. It's still visible on the old board, but not where we are now *thinking_emoji* Hecht RetroMG
Anyway, Kalor was a Medium, every night he could receive "information" from a dead player. Of course all the dead townies worked together and were allowed to sent their joint views after dicussion forever :/ But I also was an unlimited scum switcher, so there is that.
The game was great for me, I enjoyed it very much (my first complete game, after a short stint in archer). Don't know what the general perception was though.
i don't understand the question
I wasn't joking about you splitting the "No" vote. What's the point of a poll if you:re going to ignore the results?Rule #29 was added that bans changing the Font Size below the default (Size 4) for in-game text as well as changing the color of your text outside of voting or specific allowances. Changing the Font above 4 is fine.
29. Do not change the font size of posts below the default (Font Size 4) or change the color of your text outside of Voting or specific allowances by the Gamerunner. Font Size changes above the default are accepted.
I'll have a chat with 'em. The implied rule is "don't do it excessively" as well.I wasn't joking about you splitting the "No" vote. What's the point of a poll if you:re going to ignore the results?
I find gif responses hard to interpret, should we ban those too?
np
good work teamBesides that, as Fireblend has already said, we have a Vote Tool back! Big thanks to Fireblend for getting it up and running and to Hecht and RetroMG for assisting with it.
There have also been some favors called in and we will be getting Highlight Tags implemented here! There is no date on when that will be other than Soon™ but when they are back you guys will know. We'll also make that our default voting format once it happens but for now we will be sticking to the current way so the Vote Tool can catch it.
wow okay.Rule #29 was added that bans changing the Font Size below the default (Size 4) for in-game text as well as changing the color of your text outside of voting or specific allowances. Changing the Font above 4 is fine.
This is bullshit.Banning Text Font Changes such as Font Size, Font Color, and Font Family.
These results were actually tied up between Yes/No with 'warn for excessive use' only 1 vote behind either. So we went to a middle ground compromise: Changing Font Size below the default (Font Size 4) is not allowed. Changing the Font Color is not allowed outside of voting. Changing Font Size above the default is fine as is changing the Font Family.
29. Be aware that some people may find some font color/size changes very difficult to read. If you choose to use a different font size or color than the default, be ready to change it if someone requests it.
Oh also rule 5 now forbids "I'm going to be unavailable/busy because blah blah etc", should maybe specify referring to other player's activity.
Thank youWe talked it over and we did misinterpret the Survey results and should not have split the 'no' option into two separate answers. We're sorry for doing that. Taking them both into account the new wording for #29 has been changed. No text changes are banned (outside of banning changing size/family for Votes for the Vote Tool) but the current updated rule is now in place to accommodate some Players.
We were paying attention and not ignoring anyone. No one person is making these choices and the divide on banning/not banning was split among Overseers similar to how we first read the survey votes and we had a long discussion about it. The original rule was decided as a half-way point between banning and not banning to accommodate the tied vote and as we've become aware that some members of the community do have trouble reading certain colors or the small text for various reasons.
When it was brought to light that the Survey was not correctly done and that this decision was not what the majority wanted it was brought up in Overseer chat. We gave other members of the Overseer group time to come in and voice their opinion on it since it's a group decision and not an individual choice to make. However, because it's the weekend, many of us have not been online enough to have a proper talk about it and it's taken longer than normal.
We are sorry for setting the survey up incorrectly, we wanted to do what the majority of the community wanted and that's not what ended up happening. We have fixed our mistake and appreciate your patience. Thank you.
Cool5 has also been updated to distinguish that it's for other player's activity. Thank you for pointing it out.
When you're right, you're right.I didn't even participate in the poll and I got what I wanted
That's true power