ROTS is awful. Only thing it has going for it is that it's not AOTC, although the dialogue is almost as bad.
Couldn't tell you, I liked it but tastes vary. I could tell you that any of the prequel movies are many orders of magnitude worse.
I can only think that people that say these things were edgy children when they first watched ROTS.
you mean sithI mean, if we constitute meme-ness and unintentional memorability as indicators of quality of a film, yes absolutely Revenge Of The Jedi is better lol.
You really hate these disney movies eh? The bad CGI alone and pitiful script just makes it awful. How can you hate how TLJ and TFA is written then turn around and start praising prequel movies?
If you said the 3rd-6th season of Clone Wars, Id agree. But C'mon Son. Stop being salty that a real writer got a hold of Luke and gave him some character development.
GOD TIER:
ESB
ANH
Good tier:
ROTJ-TLJ (Time will tell whether TLJ ultimately lands for me, its tied with ROTJ, for now. But, could be pushed into God tier)
Decent tier:
ROTS
TFA
Bad tier:
TPM
RO
Is this even a movie tier?:
AOTC.
Pump your brakes, kid. I said no such thing. TLJ is the best thing since the OT.
You weren't the guy in every TLJ thread complaining how they ruined everything?
Eh given your other terrible opinion, the endorsement of TLJ may be tainting that film.Pump your brakes, kid. I said no such thing. TLJ is the best thing since the OT.
Nah, you must be thinking about someone else. Also, criticism doesn't mean that someone "hates" something. I typically don't spend a lot of time thinking about or criticizing things I hate, only things I care about, a lot. I have my problems with The Last Jedi, Finn and Luke's treatment primarily. But, it is by far the best sequel movie, miles better than TFA, and the right step forward for the franchise. As I said in the OP, TLJ is a messy fucking movie, but also a bold one. I'll take an ambitiously flawed move over tired retreads and fan-service any day. Which is also why I like ROTS more than TFA, it has its flaws, but it's bold and ambitious while retaining the core of Star Wars. Meanwhile, TFA is just retreading well worn ground like ROTJ but without any of the Luke stuff.
Thanks for correcting me, got Revenge of The Sith and Return of the Jedi crossed in my brain lol.you mean sith
I guess that makes ROTS is the best star wars movie with TLJ coming close by the sheer might of Ben Swolo
Prequels > New Trilogy
TFA = Worst Star Wars Film
ROTS is on par with the original trilogy.
Original trilogy (and SW films) aren't even that good.
This is a ranking I respect, but I'd put RotS above TPMIf we're ranking again
The Empire Strikes Back
A New Hope
The Last Jedi
The Force Awakens
Rogue One
Return of the Jedi
The Phantom Menace
Revenge of the Sith
Attack of the Cones
Absolutely agree, its not a controversial opinion.
ROTS is a good movie, with some of the best Starwars moments in the Saga.
OK here's the thing I have to say.
The prequels are plagued by bad scripting and insanely awkward dialogues. But all in all, the stories were compelling, the characters were unique, the world building was phenomenal (which Clone Wars and KOTOR used to its full potential), the adventure feel was great.
Maybe it's because I grew up with it but I can easily see past the issues to enjoy them.
TFA was solid despite lacking creativity and adventure. It's my least rewatched Star Wars film. (Obviously as it came out later, but by that I mean I don't really want to see it again after watching it a couple of times)
Not really saying much.ROTS is easily the best of the prequels though, that I'll give OP.
Even if he just thought he was totally lying it's not something you just don't tell Windu or Yoda.
You think they'd say hey, it's at least worth looking into instead of just not doing anything about Palpatine for three years even after hearing from Dooku that the Chancellor is Darth Sidious while they notice the dark side surrounds the Chancellor.
Revenge of the sith is not in anyway shape or form a good film. It's not even a decent one, let alone better than TFA or TLJ. By every metric of filmmaking it fails as it tries to wrap up a horrid trilogy that failed right off the bat while also trying so hard to neatly tie everything up in a nice little bow. Leading to a metric fuckton of plot contrivances, (which is saying something considering the prequels are full of them), that are incredibly laughable. Like Chewbacca the war hero who worked alongside Yoda in the CW as they repelled the droid attack on the wookies. Hell Sheev and Obiwan aren't even well acted in this film when you consider what those actors are capable of. This is not good chemistry at all, as Hayden doesn't have any chemistry with any actor in this trilogy. This is two actors reading their lines, with incredibly awkward camera framing and editing doing nothing to add to the scene, which as a reveal, should be incredibly dramatic.
Let it go guys.
TFA is literally the perfect example of the people in charge having an obsessive understanding of what made the franchise good in the first place place when it debuted 1977. If your main complaint about TFA is that it resembles the hero's journey structure of ANH, then you completely missed the point of what the film was trying to accomplish.One of the best first posts will see on this site. I rather get more movies like ROTS than generic by the number trash like TFA that was conceived by a bunch of office suits that have no idea what makes this franchise good.
"I'll take what barely passes as a commentary on politics over a celebration of why SW is good any day of the week!! Something something lightsaber fights and originality™ despite the hilarious amount of shoehorning to tie everything together. Yoda riding Chewbacca is original™, thus it's good, by default. ""It's better than Attack of the Clones!"
"At least it has some original ideas, unlike Force Awakens!"
If the only way you can make a case for ROTS is by slagging off the other prequels or sequels, the n that really doesn't speak well for ROTS.