Correction it has a 4K 60 FPS mode. We don't know what that will look like visually compared to the visuals mode and we don't know if it will run at native 4K at all. 4K hasn't really meant 4K this gen so color me skeptical. Having said that what they've shown thus far does look good regardless of frame rate or resolution.
Follow the above quotes to see the posts he was replying too.
www.resetera.com
Sorry if this is a stupid question, I'm just jumping into the conversation now and also not very technically knowledgeable on this stuff.
Digital foundry spoke to devs who confirmed they are running the gpu at max clocks. locked.
PlayStation 5 uncovered: the Mark Cerny tech deep dive
On March 18th, Sony finally broke cover with in-depth information on the technical make-up of PlayStation 5. Expanding …www.eurogamer.net
The teraflop number isn't what dictated that. One machine has 12GB of RAM, a higher specked GPU, and better memory clocks. That matters. Not a theoretical number.
Considering it's a major part in how the machine is going to be run on a new technology it's worth mentioning.
Have you been living under a rock this entire generation?
That is great to read, even if it's for the 100th time.
It's a 12.155tf console vs a 10~TF console so it's around a 20% difference.
I always love ridiculous comments like the underlined. :D
uuhh?
It's a 10~ TF console according to Matt, so that makes for a ~20 difference.
its not 0.64 tflops. its 1.31 tflops vs 1.84 tflops. or 0.53 tflops.
Naw, teraflops are all that matter. 3GB more ram, higher clocks? pfffft. Please.
Will play the living hell out of it in VR. The true proper way to experience that suspense & fear imo. It is soooooo good and tense af.
Gladly :). I just assumed you didn't need this explained.
Actually it's 17.5%. Smack in the middle of you two, lol.
He said about 10 TF b/c he doesn't know the exact number off the top of his head and didn't want to waste more time looking it up because of the pettiness of some posters.
Indeed. Thankfully, someone recognizes the numbers that do matter.
Ironically, your percents don't match another person who explained it (albeit, far less condescending than you did and certainly didn't kill the idea that teraflops are at the back-end of what matters in a computer system). Thanks for playing, though. :)
Everyone will keep going in circles until the systems are out and DF does some comparisons. I think that is the time these types of discussions will die down.
My percentages are rough, and are off by a slight bit. But it's definitely close enough and you can do the math yourself.
Yes, this. I monitor my card all the time. I keep Riva Tuner running for everything because I love overclocking my stuff, so if anything is going wrong I'd notice it. When I'm playing not so demanding games or scenes the gpu and cpu reduce it's clocks because it's not needed. This is especially true when I cap the framerate. If it's not capped it will run as hard as it's allowed to, even if I'm staring at the sky, though that still might not push things hard enough.
I love this. Make sure you get all those extra decimal places in when talking about Xbox. But the 0.28 is not important.
I live by the standard set in this article for discussion. Simply put — do they matter 0%? Not quite. Do they matter more than things I mentioned? I wouldn't say so and neither would they.
Yes, and I am not dismissing what dusk has been hearing from devs, but that is the only way this makes sense. If the ps5 is rdna 1.0 which as we know from the 5700xt is not a very capable 4k 60 fps machine. rdna 1.0 cards also cannot go beyond 2.1 ghz no matter how much you try and overclock it. and rdna 1.0 cards stop providing linear boosts to performance past 1.8.1.9 ghz. no vrs, fake hardware rt, no rdna 2.0 ipc gains. this theory relies on Cerny and Lisa Su lying about this being a rdna 2.0 gpu. which is funny because once the console and games come out, the jig is up. sony would have a PR disaster on their hands and they wont be able to hide it anymore. So all this secrecy for what?
