The point you were debating was a single example of the man's behaviour, mixed with everything else we do know it's telling of his character.
You're talking like all we have is the suggestion of a single character flaw and we're attempting to condemn him for that.
Randy Pitchford is an arrogant douchebag who can't take criticism, holds petty grudges with youtubers, has a weird obsession with stage magic that he feels he has to inflict on everyone else, and hilariously lost a thumb drive that for some reason contained both sensitive business information AND porn at a medieval times.
He's a garbage person and if he were my boss I'd probably quit.
But maybe don't call people pedophiles when there is no evidence of it, yeah?