I don't remember them being nearly as much as the vita cards. I know they took traditional memory sticks as opposed to the proprietary ones vita used.
No shit, making a new handheld will only benefit thr market for Nintendo.
Even if they were to make a 1:1 Switch clone they lack the proper 1st party to carried it like nintendo did with the Switch
Yes, but the Vita had a $300 version, and that's what people look at... the premium model. That in tandem with needing a memory card, the console started at around $350.Launches aligned, 3DS was outselling Vita at $250. It's crazy but the market really, really didn't want a Vita.
Is good for consumer but Sony is likely not gonna engage when they cant get the upper hand. Bot PSP vs DS and PSV vs 3DS sony bet was on better power. Currently you cant make something that would differentiate itself enough on power from Switch, so what they will do ia basically expand a marker where Nintendo has the upper hand due to exclusive 1st party titles
LOL, the 3DS support was garbage until 2013.Compare the support to the 3DS, which was also met with a lukewarm reception on release.
Sony pulled the plug way too early, Vita should've gotten aggressive price cuts on the console (and especially those memory cards), as indies were very willing to give it a chance.
I still cant believe sony let their studios say that stuffSony was never committed to their Handhelds in the way that is required. Their own studios openly stated on numerous occasions they had no desire and would never do handheld games. You can force development of course as they did with a few B and C tier studios but when your A Tiers say lol no. there is no serious support.
They threw at that money on the burning cash pile known as "Xperia"I think the fact that sony just Burned 7Billions on saving PS3 public image (was still a financial disaster) + Sony being mid re-arranging all their branches and core bussiness is what kept em out of trying a hard push save on Vita, maybe was less impactful for their bottom line to just let it die rather than trying to save it.
I'm not sure about this, everyone was focused on how the cheaper model would steamroll the 3DS.Yes, but the Vita had a $300 version, and that's what people look at... the premium model.
it's not like the fans were disagreeing. at the time, a year, year and a half after launch, i was seeing ps fans be happy about such statements and have the same reaction nintendo fans now (6 and a half years after launch) have about 3ds game announcement. just being annoyed and saying they'd rather the game was be on a console.
You must've missed the 100 threads about the switch meaning Sony needs to make a vita 2 or hybrid ps5I hope no one was even jokingly thinking this was a possibility
but what can they do? a hybrid ps4 isn't possible now or in the new future, so of course a hybrid ps5 wouldn't be possible. a hybrid ps3 probably isn't possible because of ps3's architecture, and even if it was, ps3 is a dead platform with no upcoming games, can't have a successful platform just on the back of already existing game without the excitement of upcoming games. vita can't be it either, it's done and it's library isn't that exciting.There's no way Sony is ignoring the success of the Switch. If there's one thing they're known for it's taking Nintendo's great ideas.
Yes, but the Vita had a $300 version, and that's what people look at... the premium model. That in tandem with needing a memory card, the console started at around $350.
If it came with a 4GB and there was no WiFi version, the system would have done considerably better. The larger memory cards needed to be cheaper, but the system also needed to come with one.
There's no way Sony is ignoring the success of the Switch. If there's one thing they're known for it's taking Nintendo's great ideas.
Sony's main priority is to solidify the upcoming PS5 by giving it the best first party games it can get. Making handhelds is easy, but making games for it is hard. They are not going to waste valuable studio time on a handheld right now.I don't think they'll go the hybrid route, probably just create another handheld.
I dont think you can currently somethinf with vanilla PS4 output that will be on Switch form factor, last mkre than 1 hour and dont melt, all that while being into the 300$ limit
It seems more likely that Sony will have some sort of PSnow based portable.
I dont even want to imagine an stream service tru WifiIt seems more likely that Sony will have some sort of PSnow based portable.
But that's factually wrong?LOL, the 3DS support was garbage until 2013.
The Vita launched with several major titles like Uncharted and Wipeout and had Killzone, Tearaway, Soul Sacrifice and others a year after launch. It's just that nobody gave a damn.
Which should tell you that what you called "major titles" weren't so "major".LOL, the 3DS support was garbage until 2013.
The Vita launched with several major titles like Uncharted and Wipeout and had Killzone, Tearaway, Soul Sacrifice and others a year after launch. It's just that nobody gave a damn.
Well they aren't ignoring the success of the PS4, which is more successful. So it's gonna be another powerful home console, like the PS4 and not a hybrid. Let Nintendo do the hybrid stuff now. Sony's focus is PS4/PS5, PlayStation VR and some mobile games from ForwardWorks.There's no way Sony is ignoring the success of the Switch. If there's one thing they're known for it's taking Nintendo's great ideas.