That is one of the few reasons which make sense for why Nintendo still do not offer local backups and don't appear to plan on adding it any time soon. It is an extremely simple feature.
Create a problem to sell you the solution.
What other conclusion is there? Allowing people to back up save files to a USB drive is a very basic feature that other consoles have offered for over a decade now.
For some reason the Switch never offered this feature, and I've seen many people on this forum report having their Switch break or become lost, and those people lost all their save files.
So now Nintendo shows up and wants to offer a solution to a problem they created, but they want us to pay them to fix it.
This "service" is anti-consumer BS. Anyone putting money into it is encouraging Nintendo's anti-consumer practices and discouraging them from making the service better.
Anyone subscribing to the NOS is making it worse for everyone, because Nintendo will have less incentive to make an actual consumer-friendly service.
IIRC, the 3DS did at least offer local save backups of digital titles. Don't think they offered it for cartridge games which is a problem in itself.Neither the Wii U nor the 3DS offered backups that worked if your hardware was broken or stolen. This isn't a new problem they created. It's a problem they've had for a while given they are so tight with their save system. If you want to argue it should be free, sure.
This may be the most unintentionally hilarious post I've seen in a while.
IIRC, the 3DS did at least offer local save backups of digital titles. Don't think they offered it for cartridge games which is a problem in itself.
Is this not a description of the USB backup service on the Wii U? https://en-americas-support.nintendo.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/2865/~/how-to-back-up-save-data
People care because the online underperforming, ie. people not spending their $20 for Switch's online, sends a message to Nintendo that their offering is not substantial enough to justify the price. Now, obviously you and everyone else will spend your money how you wish, but people who are against Nintendo's online do have a vested interest in people doing the opposite.People who care how others spend 20 bucks should be ashamed of themselves
All the saves are tied to the hardware. If the hardware dies or is stolen, the saves are useless. Try transferring the drives or SD cards to other systems and they will not work. They were backups in case of hard drive failure, not system failure. The Wii U required transferring save data with game data, so it was a necessity since the internal drive was at max 32GB. The Switch on the other hand keeps all the saves on the internal drive negating the need for this.
It's very easy to misunderstand though.
What is the relevance of prior Nintendo consoles not offering a save backup option? All that matters in this conversation is the fact that the Switch is the only current console not offering a free option to back up saved files.Neither the Wii U nor the 3DS offered backups that worked if your hardware was broken or stolen. This isn't a new problem they created. It's a problem they've had for a while given they are so tight with their save system. If you want to argue it should be free, sure.
What is the relevance of prior Nintendo consoles not offering a save backup option? All that matters in this conversation is the fact that the Switch is the only current console not offering a free option to back up saved files.
Well the funny thing is they seem very aware save backups are a nice thing to have, and obviously they know they could enable the option to copy these save files to a USB drive. So it's certainly possible they chose to not offer this feature so they could charge for a solution.You were suggesting they held back a feature just to charge for it. This makes no sense since it actually keeps in line with how their previous two systems work. I wasn't saying anything more than that. I also explicitly ended my post by saying I'd understand why you'd want cloud backups to be free.
I have to for Smash. If it wasn't for that game, absolutely not. It's a mess.
I couldn't have put better words in my mouth. These are my thoughts exactly. So underwhelming, and that's an understatement.Well, I don't play online anymore, don't give a fuck about 30+ years old games, and the cloud save system they came up with is just embarrassingly bad.
So no, the price is irrelevant. The overall service package is just shit.
Can that be Era's slogan?Just because you don't like something doesn't make it "anti-consumer."