but I want to see if days gone bombed so I can begin my syphon filter virtual protest!Individual game sales updates have been pretty random for whole this gen and not really tied to financials releases.
The main point will be if they really need to undercut MS. I don't think they do.
There is a very little chance XSX is at $400 imo. I would love that to spur competition, but MS has set expectations for their hardware at $500, and the Bill of Materials for XSX is gonna be too high to sell at $400. XB1 was at $500, X1X was $500, XSX will be $500.That kind of attitude is dangerous thinking. Let's say MS uses that legendary warchest to sell XSX at $399 and Sony sells PS5 at $499. Yes, PS5 will sell out at that price, but what happens in the next quarter when those sales stabilize and now you are the higher priced console with the "weaker" specs? MS would be drooling to be in such a situation. Sony is not dumb. They realize $399 was a boon for them last gen. I expect them to either match or go to $449.
It needs to go to $199 permanently at some point this year. It has huge potential in developing markets at that price. Would sell for years.The PS4 has a lot more chances at maintaining a long life than the PS3 ever did.
That kind of attitude is dangerous thinking. Let's say MS uses that legendary warchest to sell XSX at $399 and Sony sells PS5 at $499. Yes, PS5 will sell out at that price, but what happens in the next quarter when those sales stabilize and now you are the higher priced console with the "weaker" specs? MS would be drooling to be in such a situation. Sony is not dumb. They realize $399 was a boon for them last gen. I expect them to either match or go to $449.
That kind of attitude is dangerous thinking. Let's say MS uses that legendary warchest to sell XSX at $399 and Sony sells PS5 at $499. Yes, PS5 will sell out at that price, but what happens in the next quarter when those sales stabilize and now you are the higher priced console with the "weaker" specs? MS would be drooling to be in such a situation. Sony is not dumb. They realize $399 was a boon for them last gen. I expect them to either match or go to $449.
The billions MS loses this way would be way more better invested in things like xCloud, since they are already in the subscription direction. One thing is wanting to be competitive in price, try to price match Sony, the other is burning billions to undercut Sony when MS focus seems to be services.That kind of attitude is dangerous thinking. Let's say MS uses that legendary warchest to sell XSX at $399 and Sony sells PS5 at $499. Yes, PS5 will sell out at that price, but what happens in the next quarter when those sales stabilize and now you are the higher priced console with the "weaker" specs? MS would be drooling to be in such a situation. Sony is not dumb. They realize $399 was a boon for them last gen. I expect them to either match or go to $449.
Let's hope they don't screw up with PS5 and have plenty of first party next gen games.
I love how you and others are so determined to suggest Series X will be higher priced than the PS5 and Lockhart could never be $299.I would love to see the marketing team try to justify the Lockhart when Series X is $399 lol. If anything, Lockhart will be the one at $399 if they can't push lower
It just need a price cut, this gen we'll have 2-3 more years of cross-gen games. Online games should keep the console alive for longer, etc. 110M consoles is something hard to ignore, lol.Damn still ahead of PS2.
Unfortunately this gen is shorter so it probably won't overtake PS2 Ltd but who knows
Yeah it's amazing to me the system has done so well and only dropped $100 officially in 7 years!It needs to go to $199 permanently at some point this year. It has huge potential in developing markets at that price. Would sell for years.
The Microsoft warchest is a myth. Ever since Microsoft entered the videogame market we heard about how they would overhelm everybody thanks to their billions. And here we are today.That kind of attitude is dangerous thinking. Let's say MS uses that legendary warchest to sell XSX at $399 and Sony sells PS5 at $499. Yes, PS5 will sell out at that price, but what happens in the next quarter when those sales stabilize and now you are the higher priced console with the "weaker" specs? MS would be drooling to be in such a situation. Sony is not dumb. They realize $399 was a boon for them last gen. I expect them to either match or go to $449.
I would love to see the marketing team try to justify the Lockhart when Series X is $399 lol. If anything, Lockhart will be the one at $399 if they can't push lower
I love how you and others are so determined to suggest Series X will be higher priced than the PS5 and Lockhart could never be $299.
That kind of attitude is dangerous thinking. Let's say MS uses that legendary warchest to sell XSX at $399 and Sony sells PS5 at $499. Yes, PS5 will sell out at that price, but what happens in the next quarter when those sales stabilize and now you are the higher priced console with the "weaker" specs? MS would be drooling to be in such a situation. Sony is not dumb. They realize $399 was a boon for them last gen. I expect them to either match or go to $449.
Crazy how they are predicting 2020 to be their fourth biggest year even with a console launch
The Microsoft warchest is a myth. Ever since Microsoft entered the videogame market we heard about how they would overhelm everybody thanks to their billions. And here we are today.
I would love to see the marketing team try to justify the Lockhart when Series X is $399 lol. If anything, Lockhart will be the one at $399 if they can't push lower
For some reason, Lockhart and its price is not factored into this $399 Series X.Who would buy a $299 4tflop console that launches on the same day as a $399 12tflop console that plays the same games? I don't claim to have clairvoyance about pricing, but MS isnt the only console manufacturer that knows how to price aggressively. Matter of fact, MS hasn't priced its hardware aggressively at launch in many years, so...
Uhh the Switch Lite is $199
Let's return to reality to continue this discussion
There is a very little chance XSX is at $400 imo. I would love that to spur competition, but MS has set expectations for their hardware at $500, and the Bill of Materials for XSX is gonna be too high to sell at $400. XB1 was at $500, X1X was $500, XSX will be $500.
PS5 at its specs I expect will land at $450, though I wouldn't be surprised if it was $500 either.
For some reason, Lockhart and its price is not factored into this $399 Series X.
Some ppl expect MS to take a big loss on both their consoles?
Whoo boy.....lol
Off topic, but... If Lockhart is indeed 1080p, it would be kind of redundant because PS4 is still around, probably cheaper, and most of the games would be cross-gen anyway. At this point I think MS should ask themselves and make it be a "reconstructed 4K" system while the XSX would be a "native 4K" one or just make it a PS Vita TV thing, just compatible with xCloud and Game Pass by $99. I think PS4 will be the main competitor to Lockhart, not the PS5. I'm just guessing, anyway.Who would buy a $299 4tflop console that launches on the same day as a $399 12tflop console that plays the same games? I don't claim to have clairvoyance about pricing, but MS isnt the only console manufacturer that knows how to price aggressively. Matter of fact, MS hasn't priced its hardware aggressively at launch in many years, so...
Uhh the Switch Lite is $199
Let's return to reality to continue this discussion
Who knows, but the current sales trajectory doesn't bode well for selling another 40 million to reach PS2's record 150M.
A decline from almost 18M to 13.5M in one year. The Switch is currently at it's peak, the PS5 is around the corner, sales of the PS4 will only go down from here.