Telling people to vote doesn't counter the doom and gloom is the problem I think.
That's nice, but you're posting absolute nonsense completely detached from reality, the same nonsense that right wing people spread to encourage apathy in left wing voters to dampen turnout.
Democrats carved it up for judges, and this is part of the result Got played for like fools. I dont know if the filibuster even makes sense anymore. Vs just hard policy to make reversing laws harder when a majority passes it and or make hard passes to make laws hard to reverse.And why did we get into that place historically? Could it possibly have something to do with leaving the filibuster in place for decades when it was clear the whole time that the GOP would carve it up the second it made sense to?
What? Removing the filibuster wouldn't have mattered when getting Garland onto the court in 2016 because Republicans were in the majority.....?And why did we get into that place historically? Could it possibly have something to do with leaving the filibuster in place for decades when it was clear the whole time that the GOP would carve it up the second it made sense to?
Voting is great for harm reduction and people should vote.
It's also not going to fucking solve an issue caused by a disparity between voting and representation, as well as a system that has an unelected political elite. I vote Democrat. I urge people to vote Democrat. I campaigned for Democrats. I am allowed to point out how fucking flawed the Democrats have been.
The democrats also need a rising star or a beacon of hope for people to look out for, like Obama was before he got elected.
Only question is who this could be? Beto?
I know everyones already dunking on you but fuck that shit.Obama: "Here's a supreme court justice"
Republicans: "LOL no"
Trump: "Here's a supreme court justice"
Democrats: "Okay :("
And why did we get into that place historically? Could it possibly have something to do with leaving the filibuster in place for decades when it was clear the whole time that the GOP would carve it up the second it made sense to?
I can't think of anyone who fits the bill exactly off the top of my head.The democrats also need a rising star or a beacon of hope for people to look out for, like Obama was before he got elected.
Only question is who this could be? Beto?
You are intentionally lying and trolling.Obama: "Here's a supreme court justice"
Republicans: "LOL no"
Trump: "Here's a supreme court justice"
Democrats: "Okay :("
The problem with Obama is that he was a huge disappointment (he had an opportunity to codify Roe for example when he had the Senate and House but conveniently didn't) and went back to being a standard affair centrist despite campaigning as the progressive in 2008. Voters need a reason to be hopeful and that hope comes from results and evidence that justifies it.The democrats also need a rising star or a beacon of hope for people to look out for, like Obama was before he got elected.
Only question is who this could be? Beto?
I'll post this again:I would seriously love to hear a single optimistic thing grounded in reality from any of the gung ho dems in this thread because so far y'all are the ones making me feel stupid for voting.
I can't think of anyone who fits the bill exactly off the top of my head.
However, I think the Democratic machinery, however people might dislike or downplay it, should at least be capable of manufacturing one/enhancing what's already there if they put all their effort behind it.
It just isn't Biden.
What? Removing the filibuster wouldn't have mattered when getting Garland onto the court in 2016 because Republicans were in the majority.....?
Like I get it, Dems are disorganized and shitty, but stop making things up and spreading low-info nonsense. What.
No he didn't.The problem with Obama is that he was a huge disappointment (he had an opportunity to codify Roe for example when he had the Senate and House but conveniently didn't) and went back to being a standard affair centrist despite campaigning as the progressive in 2008. Voters need a reason to be hopeful and that hope comes from results and evidence that justifies it.
I'll post this again:
Why vote? Look at the states that have protections for abortion already in place. Voting at the state and local levels matter just as much, if not more, as every 4 years.
Doesn't Florida have a new 15 week ban? Though not sure they try to take it further now.I'll post this again:
Why vote? Look at the states that have protections for abortion already in place. Voting at the state and local levels matter just as much, if not more, as every 4 years.
Obama: "Here's a supreme court justice"
Republicans: "LOL no"
Trump: "Here's a supreme court justice"
Democrats: "Okay :("
I think the most likely place the US is headed is into a federalist system with an extremely impotent federal government and large liberal blocs of states (basically all of New England and the West Coast) just ignoring federal laws and doing their own thing.
Like, I don't think the US is going to get into a civil war because California recognizes same sex marriage. I don't think we are going to formally see secessions in our lifetime but we're going to wind up with semi-autonomous blocks of the country that just do whatever the fuck they want.
Honestly, we largely saw that during the pandemic anyway with different states deciding to handle it differently and even cities in Texas and elsewhere ignoring the state government and just doing whatever they wanted with mask mandates.
I've always said if the republicans were in full power, expect some rights to be taken away.McCarthy already calling for a federal Ban on Abortion if GOP takes the House and Senate.
Would obviously be veto'd by Biden... but still this should be ringing alarm bells all over the country of what we are in for under a GOP Government. The immediate and swift removal of any humans rights is a reality.
Doesn't Florida have a new 15 week ban? Though not sure they try to take it further now.
It's important to think of America as a conglomeration of 50 semi-countries with some overarching regulations from a central governing body. This thinking would make state elections a lot more meaningful to apathetic voters.
1. I wasn't questioning if you voted or not.I vote, and will always vote, but I don't see how any of that matters unless dems can somehow prevent this Supreme Court from banning abortion nationally soon, which they'll clearly do, and also rolling back everything good that's happened since 1900 along the way.
Popped back in here, see the arguments going on...Official Staff CommunicationThe news today is extremely abhorrent, and many people are furious over the reversal of Roe v. Wade. All of us on staff are feeling similarly - defeated, angry, frustrated - we understand. But we cannot allow for calls to violence here. We will not host that content and anyone doing it will catch a ban. Similarly, dismissive calls to "just move" that downplay the reality of many people's situations will also be moderated.
Didn't the Democrats have majority control of both chambers of the senate at least before 2010? How else did he pass the ACA?
If you click on the link:Doesn't Florida have a new 15 week ban? Though not sure they try to take it further now.
I think it'll go further simply because fascists can't get along with anyone, and neither can theocrats. A combo of both in full power? They would be tortured every moment knowing liberal states have their own rules and would assault them any way they could.
Okay? None of this makes your original post implying that Dems "allowed" Trump to choose justices any less inaccurate. I'm so confused.Stop thinking in terms of the last 6 years only and realize some of us have been anti-filibuster since 1994 or so.
States literally have their own constitutions lol. Funny how we talk about being the "united states" when we are anything but. That alone is an inherently flawed system.America is almost like some form of...union of individual states.... 😱🤯
That was likely the goal.
What? Removing the filibuster wouldn't have mattered when getting Garland onto the court in 2016 because Republicans were in the majority.....?
Like I get it, Dems are disorganized and shitty, but stop making things up and spreading low-info nonsense. What.
I think the most likely place the US is headed is into a federalist system with an extremely impotent federal government and large liberal blocs of states (basically all of New England and the West Coast) just ignoring federal laws and doing their own thing.
Like, I don't think the US is going to get into a civil war because California recognizes same sex marriage. I don't think we are going to formally see secessions in our lifetime but we're going to wind up with semi-autonomous blocks of the country that just do whatever the fuck they want.
Honestly, we largely saw that during the pandemic anyway with different states deciding to handle it differently and even cities in Texas and elsewhere ignoring the state government and just doing whatever they wanted with mask mandates.
Would it be a bad idea for people that don't understand how politics and voting work to be threadbanned? Especially if they have no desire to learn and just spread bad information?
Obama: "Here's a supreme court justice"
Republicans: "LOL no"
Trump: "Here's a supreme court justice"
Democrats: "Okay :("
Dems having all three branches today thanks to two Dems in conservative states doesn't erase the bad performance in previous years like 2014 and 2016. Those two elections especially set the stage for this.
Its certainly possible but they need the economic output of those areas *and* they need someplace for liberal Americans to go or they risk a brain drain to Europe/Canada/NZ/Australia.
Didn't the Democrats have majority control of both chambers of the senate at least before 2010? How else did he pass the ACA?
I would seriously love to hear a single optimistic thing grounded in reality from any of the gung ho dems in this thread because so far y'all are the ones making me feel stupid for voting.