Republicans don't really use their heads. They will take it personally and riot.
I'm talking about protecting women in red states.
Republicans don't really use their heads. They will take it personally and riot.
Genuinely curious if Clarence Thomas is a true believer or just getting paid in a big way to be the biggest piece of shit possible.
Or wait 30 years to reverse this awful decision and the ones that are sure to come just like it?So... protect people in red states by hastening the split of the country into a situation which will lead to their rights being stripped anyways?
Genuinely curious if Clarence Thomas is a true believer or just getting paid in a big way to be the biggest piece of shit possible.
"The liberals made my life miserable for 43 years," a former clerk remembered Thomas – who was 43 years old when confirmed – saying, according to The New York Times. "And I'm going to make their lives miserable for 43 years."
Or wait 30 years to reverse this awful decision and the ones that are sure to come just like it?
If the country is really going to split up, so be it. We have to do something. This is a war on BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS and Roe being tossed is just the start, anyone knows that with half a brain.
My heart hurts for you...what a terrible decision process to have to go through. And, not at all to take this away from you, but I consider your voice in a pool of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands to millions, who may similarly have to make a more weighted decision because of this detrimental decision by the SC...
It's not fucking fair. Women keep getting put on the sidelines, and for what?
My heart hurts for you...what a terrible decision process to have to go through. And, not at all to take this away from you, but I consider your voice in a pool of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands to millions, who may similarly have to make a more weighted decision because of this detrimental decision by the SC...
It's not fucking fair. Women keep getting put on the sidelines, and for what?
And
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas told his law clerks in the '90s that he wanted to serve for 43 years to make liberals' lives 'miserable'
In a 1993 article in The New York Times, a former law clerk of the Supreme Court Justice said Thomas held a grudge against liberals for making his life miserable.www.businessinsider.com
There's your answer
How would you even know that expansion of the SCOTUS would be the magic spell that actually splits up the country? Everyone worries about it, yes; TX is thinking about actual secession for their own reasons that are far more likely to start one anyway. That's why I say so be it. There are other things that are more likely to trigger the US being split up, not to mention even if expansion of SCOTUS did cause some kind of civil conflict I'm inclined to think blue states would be flagrantly defying laws in red states to help people there affected by GOP fuckery. They're likely going to end up doing this anyway for a lot of women, I'd bet.How does letting the country split up protect the rights of women, LGBTQ, BIPOC in red states?
Best think to do at this point is split imo, staying united is just causing too many good to suffer for the bad. Life too short to keep asking people to go back and forth, its literally been centuries of fuckry compared to a few recent decades of decent progress.Or wait 30 years to reverse this awful decision and the ones that are sure to come just like it?
If the country is really going to split up, so be it. We have to do something. This is a war on BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS and Roe being tossed is just the start, anyone knows that with half a brain.
Pelosi's letter outlines what things they're doing legislatively including looking at period tracking apps and travel. None of these will probably pass the senate, but they are putting up proposals.
Or wait 30 years to reverse this awful decision and the ones that are sure to come just like it?
If the country is really going to split up, so be it. We have to do something. This is a war on BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS and Roe being tossed is just the start, anyone knows that with half a brain.
Best think to do at this point is split imo, staying united is just causing too many good to suffer for the bad. Life too short to keep asking people to go back and forth, its literally been centuries of fuckry compared to a few recent decades of decent progress.
How would you even know that expansion of the SCOTUS would be the magic spell that actually splits up the country?
How does letting the country split up protect the rights of women, LGBTQ, BIPOC in red states?
These self-hating fuckers seems to always think they're the exception. Look at Log Cabin Republicans for a perfect example. They are only just now complaining about the anti-LGBT stances of the party they supported for decades because said party isn't making some special exceptions for them in their Christo-Fascist drive. What made them think they weren't gonna burn at the proverbial stake like other LGBT people if the GOP succeeds? Tax cuts and deregulations are pretty worthless when you're either dead or jailed for being LGBT.It's pretty hard to be Black and not know what Uncle Clarence is. My Mom, Grandma and alllll my Aunts can tell you what Uncle Clarence is. What his dumb ass has failed to realize in his 74 years as an ass kisser is something I've known since I was 11. No matter what you do for the people he's decided to serve you are still just a nigger to them. At that is something I will NEVER forget like he seems to.
I don't care because if looming civil war is the trajectory we are really on, expanding SCOTUS and twisting the knife into the filibuster just a little more aren't going to probably change that one way or another.I was responding to you expressing that you didn't care if it hastened civil war. Changing the rules with a bare majority in government while not addressing the structural issues that are the cause for that bare majority doesn't really establish the rights that you want.
Yeah.It's pretty hard to be Black and not know what Uncle Clarence is. My Mom, Grandma and alllll my Aunts can tell you what Uncle Clarence is. What his dumb ass has failed to realize in his 74 years as an ass kisser is something I've known since I was 11. No matter what you do for the people he's decided to serve you are still just a nigger to them. At that is something I will NEVER forget like he seems to.
How does keeping it together protect the rights of those in red states?
There aren't good options here. I think if there was a clear winner we could rally around it but we're stuck.
Red states won't be small-d democratic after 2022 when they fascists take over the offices certifying elections.
So you won't be able to campaign to protect minorities then.
It's definitely not fucking fair and I know that if I'm having to make these kinds of decisions so are countless of other women who may be around my age, and even women who may actually be at the prime age for pregnancy as well. So, you're good <3.
The SCOTUS has given women an ultimatum: your life or procreation. And in the instance that I can't have children safely, I'm going to 100% choose my own life. At least I can control that.....to an extent.
Literally watching what my state will do like a hawk because of this.
(Naiad is my wife)
Clarence Thomas has no ulterior motives or deep philosophical ruminations.
He's just a vengeful coon piece of shit. They exist.
But what's more telling is that he was ultimately elevated to this position of power by white folks.
If uncle ruckus became a Supreme Court justiceClarence Thomas has no ulterior motives or deep philosophical ruminations.
He's just a vengeful coon piece of shit. They exist.
But what's more telling is that he was ultimately elevated to this position of power by white folks.
Hey what the fuck
My Black ass can call a coon a coon if I want to.
He is. We all agree there.
He ain't lying about that coon ass mofo
We're allowed to call out traitors in our ranks.
Justice Thomas: Southern Poverty Law Center's 'Hate Group' Designation of Christian Ministry Shows It's Time to 'Revisit' Times v. Sullivan
Justice Thomas: Southern Poverty Law Center's 'Hate Group' Designation of Christian Ministry Shows It's Time to 'Revisit' Times v. Sullivan
Justice Clarence Thomas stood apart from his fellow justices, again calling for the court to reconsider longstanding precedent regarding defamation lawsuits.lawandcrime.com
-About three months later, this born-again Christian called me to explain that he was against abortion but his daughter was only a junior in high school and was too young to have a baby and he was also afraid that if she did have a baby she would not want to put it up for adoption.
While going over contraceptive options, they shared that they were Pro-Life and disagreed with abortion, but that the patient could not afford to raise a child right now.
Will only someone think of Clarence "the day of the geechie is gone" Thomas feelingsAre we really defending the honor of Clarence Thomas from being accurately described as a coon by other Black folks in this thread?
Conservatives don't actually have any philosophical consistency other than upholding bigotry. Any hypocrisies we point out are just ad hoc justifications for their bullshit.These trash cans use the same logic on welfare and social safety nets ad racism.
I know, it just further increases my hatred of them.Conservatives don't actually have any philosophical consistency other than upholding bigotry. Any hypocrisies we point out are just ad hoc justifications for their bullshit.
That biscuit-lipped Uncle Tom took some of my rights away out of admitted spite and that's what some folks wanna be mad at.Are we really defending the honor of Clarence Thomas from being accurately described as a coon by other Black folks in this thread?
That biscuit-lipped Uncle Tom took some of my rights away out of admitted spite and that's what some folks wanna be mad at.
Are we really defending the honor of Clarence Thomas from being accurately described as a coon by other Black folks in this thread?
invitation onlyI'm totally fine if this thread devolves into a roasting circle over Clarence Thomas's appearance
Tone policing black people is pretty much a national pass time...so not really that surprising I suppose.
Is wild to see anyone go to bat for Clarence Thomas though...
For what it's worth, I don't think even hardcore feminists would be above calling Amy Barrett a cunt-ass bitch.
I hate the mothafucka. Happy to say it. I'd spit on him if I could. Not just for what he's done but what he will eventually get to do to affirmative action.So what is the libertarian stance on this ruling? They're pretty big on individual liberty, right? They said anything yet? I'm curious if they keeping the same energy with this garbage ruling.
It's like on principle I typically say calling a Black man that shit ain't cool since I believe we deserve the same opportunity to be wrong like everyone else.
I only really get salty when I see white liberals saying shit like that.
But there is zero chance of that happening with this clown. Dude has gone above and beyond to earn that reputation so who am I to deny him access to his tapdancing shoes.
I'm just saying…who is he to deny human beings access to their bodies? Dude is trash. I don't hate the man, just think he's trash. And for lying. Let this be a lesson to anyone trying to say that court isn't political.